User talk:Wildscreenorg

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or website, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf^(talk) 11:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wildscreenorg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

wildnaturestory (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

We are the charity Wildscreen and simply wish to update some of the out-of-date information about our charity and projects that's currently published on Wikipedia. We realise now that our original name was inappropriate due to the inclusion of 'org' as we were limited to what names we could choose as 'wildscreen' was already taken. We are now aware of why we were blocked and will ensure in the future that any edits we make don't come across as advertisements or promotion. If we are unblocked we would like to update information on our pages which are currently out of date, and add more relevant information.

Decline reason:

Declined for lack of response. Feel free to submit a new unblock request when you are ready. -- asilvering (talk) 03:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wildscreenorg (talk) 12:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposed new username is no better - your username cannot represent an organization. Wikipedia accounts are for individuals, not organizations. Only one person can use this account and never share access with anyone else, for any reason. Your account name must therefore reflect individual use.
You must follow the proper disclosure requirements in Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure policy. If you are employed by this organization, that is enough to trigger this policy. It does not matter whether or not you are being paid specifically to edit Wikipedia.
You should never directly edit articles where you have an inherent conflict of interest. You should instead be learning the process to make edit requests that can be reviewed by independent editors.
We have little interest in what an organization wishes to say about itself. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be summaries of material about a topic previously published by reliable, third-party sources with no personal, political or financial interest in the topic.

--Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:26, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To add to what Drm310 stated, I also want to ask how this account is being used. Are multiple people using the account? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:44, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]