Jump to content

User talk:WikipedianRevolutionary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 10mmsocket (talk) 07:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not create any more "controversial" move requests until the ones you have open have been resolved. Walt Yoder (talk) 01:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, I wasn't that disruptive, and it's also a kinda mean way of greeting new users! WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 14:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, what did I do to get this warning? WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 14:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I also advise you to read my user page! WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 14:41, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Page moves

[edit]

Hello, WikipedianRevolutionary,

You are moving around a lot of articles to new page titles that you prefer. This activity is only to be done if the page moves are uncontroversial. Where they are likely to be controversial, you need to start a discussion first on the article talk page. Please do this in the future instead of just moving articles to your preferred title. You are still a very new editor and need to edit more to refine your judgment.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, its Manual of Style or page moves, please bring them to the Teahouse where experienced editors can offer you support, advice and a second opinion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 19:49, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for being nice and for not threatening me with blocks, although I do understand what I’ve done! WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 20:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian Civil War

[edit]

The closing was obviously made by someone who didn’t endorse the move, but whatever, it doesn’t really matter. WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 18:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cinderella157 (talk) 00:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, now my user page is a contentious topic? WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 05:53, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I inadvertantly added the incorrect notice template. See correct notice. Cinderella157 (talk) 09:43, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

I did not assume you were editing in bad faith by opening the RM at Talk:2011 Syrian Revolution#Requested move 19 July 2023. However, I was pointing out how opening that RM would be seen (yes, I did so in quite strong terms). I will assume that you would like me to close this for you? Can I suggest that you review the preceding RM. You will see that experienced editors have cited prevailing WP:P&G and given (or referred to) evidence addressing the criteria established by that P&G - thereby substantiating their reason/view with respect to the proposal. Less experienced editors have offered unsubstantiated opinion, which generally carries little weight in determining WP:CONSENSUS. Liz has stated above: You are still a very new editor and need to edit more to refine your judgment [regarding article titles and page moves]. I would echo this advice. It is better to sit back and learn a bit, than to jump in at the deep end and be labeled as disruptive. I see from above, that others have also cautioned you about page moves. If you do feel strongly about a particular title, follow Liz's advice and start a discussion to test the waters. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 02:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, older users usually look down on newer users. WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 05:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You should close the last Syrian Civil War RM, not the revolution one. WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 05:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I had hoped that you might take onboard some of the guidance offered by myself, Walt Yoder, M.Bitton and Liz. Nonetheless, your post at Talk:Syrian civil war#Opinion on RM: I was emotionally manipulated to withdraw my request. Basically, if I didn’t withdraw it, I would’ve been warned or even blocked,[1] indicates to me that you don't know when to WP:DROPTHESTICK. However, if you believe that I have acted in any way toward you that is inappropriate, it is your prerogative to raise the matter at WP:ANI. I also observe that your posts at Talk:2011 Syrian Revolution#Requested move 19 July 2023[2] and Talk:Kyrgyz Revolution of 2010#Requested move 27 July 2023[3] (both RMs that you opened) indicate that you have responded without reading the prevailing WP:P&G that was linked in the discussions. Cinderella157 (talk) 10:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I understand, but please don’t report me. WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 11:00, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you really understand or are you just saying it to avoid being reported? If you do, please explain why starting the same move request that was closed four days earlier could easily be described as disruptive? Thanks. M.Bitton (talk) 11:26, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In some ways, it could be. Need to remind you, I’m not used to those rules that much. WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 12:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But probably it could be described as such due to making the same useless rm. WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 12:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How about you get used to the rules first? There is no "probably" about the fact that it's disruptive. I was generous in my initial description just to see whether you really understand the issue (I'm still not convinced that you do). M.Bitton (talk) 12:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Despite saying that you understand the guidance provided by myself, Walt Yoder, M.Bitton and Liz, you are still making undiscussed page moves here and opening RMs without discussion here. If you were familiar with WP:Article titles, you would be aware that, when two articles potentially have the same title, only one requires disambiguation, since WP:CONCISION is generally a primary consideration, the undiscussed move has been reverted. That article would also fall under the contentions topic Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Balkans or Eastern Europe. You opened an RM at Talk:Crimea attacks (2022–present)#Requested move 17 July 2023. Mzajac advised you there of WP:GS/RUSUKR, that non-extended-confirmed users aren’t permitted to edit in internal project discussions, including requested moves and that this applied to opening an RM in the topic area. You opened an RM at Talk:Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation#Requested move 4 August 2023. It clearly also falls within the topic area of WP:GS/RUSUKR. You were already aware of the restrictions. Opening the RM at Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation is disruptive. I am thinking that the only question at this point is how this should be dealt with? Cinderella157 (talk) 11:45, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I will promise I’ll stop! WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 14:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What do you suggest we should do if you continue? M.Bitton (talk) 18:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t really know, do you have a better idea? WikipedianRevolutionary (talk) 18:55, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Since you can't make a suggestion, we'll just have to use our imagination. M.Bitton (talk) 19:02, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:WikiManUser21 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WikiManUser21. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. Once I used to join in, // Every boy and girl was my friend. // Now there's revolution, but they don't know // What they're fighting. --Living in the Past (song), Jethro Tull -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]