User talk:Wikimegamaster

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wikimegamaster for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Stellatomailing 20:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikimegamaster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 10:56, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

IP GUY

Hey WikiMegaMaster... I guess you like to edit around dinner too? I wonder if we were posting at the same time. That's weird that it doubled you and ignored me.

I should probably register, but I'm kind of in your boat about general interest in wikipedia. I don't know how to sign things, so I'll just say it's the mysterious ip dude from the Dekker page.

Hey, I moved this to my talk page... trying to get better at wikipedia in general. Wikimegamaster 21:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

User page vandalism

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Stellatomailing. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Leebo ^T/C 20:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Dekker Dreyer (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Stellatomailing, you will be blocked from editing. Leebo ^T/C 20:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Ed (Edgar181) 20:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attempts to skew deletion debates

Do not canvas others to participate in deletion debates because you think they will support your viewpoint, this is considered vote stacking and is likely to result in you being blocked. --pgk 08:39, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope your posts declare your self to be in a battle against a deletionist and are asking people for help. That's quite clearly asking them to support your view. If you believe there is nothing wrong with this and continue, you will be blocked. --pgk 08:52, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this. Although I closed the debate about Dekker Dreyer as a keep, I in no way support the measures you used to try and get your way. Posting links to external Wikipedia-bashing sites is not going to change the mind of any admin here. I sincerely hope you haven't tried to contact Mr Dreyer, if he doesn't want to have a Wikipedia page devoted to him that would have to be discussed at a higher level than me but even if he did, that would in no way make it more likely for him to have one. In addition to this, note that neither you nor I own any part of Wikipedia and that includes our own user and talk pages. Blanking them or changing them to soapbox pages (particularly your talk page) is not acceptable behaviour. If you have left Wikipedia for good then all of this is falling on deaf ears anyway but if you return, please remember that decisions are taken based on community consensus, not on the number of votes or worse still who feels the strongest. Malla nox 15:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four halfwidth tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]