User talk:Wigdorllp

April 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Russell Abrams. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Russell Abrams. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:18, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Wigdorllp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21120 was submitted on Apr 06, 2018 12:59:44. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:59, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolving conflicts

For what it's worth, you should have gone through proper Wikipedia process and raised your issues on Talk:Russel Abrams. It is clear that the information about his legal issues was inappropriate on his profile page, and an open discussion of the matter would have found support among rational users. However, as it appears that this username represents a law firm, I feel compelled to issue the following warning:

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Wigdorllp", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it represents a group rather than an individual. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]