User talk:Weweremarshall
Weweremarshall, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Weweremarshall! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC) |
Weweremarshall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored. I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats. I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered. It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed. People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully
Decline reason:
Duplicate request SQLQuery me! 03:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
September 2016
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN talk to me 02:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Weweremarshall (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Counterpoints for the users reasoning in blocking were outright ignored. I genuinely believe the user just stopped reading my comments as he stopped discussing the topic itself and just started posting threats. I'm not asking the block be undone for this reason alone, but that the situation be reviewed by someone unbiased and un-angered. It's only 24 hours so it's not even that troubling, but the user who was initially reported, who violated 3RR two times on two different articles in a 24 hour period walked away completely unscathed. People shouldn't be banned because other users don't feel like reading their posts fully.
Decline reason:
I'm sorry - but this is clearly edit warring behavior. This appears to be a solid block. SQLQuery me! 03:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion nomination of File:RichForeverLogo.png
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:RichForeverLogo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Weweremarshall. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:RichForeverLogo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:RichForeverLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Every Blue Moon Logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Every Blue Moon Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
