User talk:Wagino 20100516
|
This user is one of the 500 most active English Wikipedians of all time. |
The Signpost News Archives:
2011 * 2012 * 2013 * 2014 * 2015 * 2016 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2020 * 2021 * 2022 * 2023 * 2024 * 2025
Your request for rollback
[edit]Hi Wagino 20100516. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 05:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Reviever user right
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:38, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Stop marking every edit as minor
[edit]None of your edits have been minor, especially the ones where you revert from redirect. It's disruptive to mark these kinds of edits as minor, per WP:MINOR, so quit it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Premeditated Chaos: Okay! I will follow your advice. Please remember and help me for other case, if any. Thank you. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Non-existent categories
[edit]Hi Wagino
In the last few weeks, you have created 109 new categories, in these edits[1].
Nearly of them are parented in a non-existent category of the form "Populated places in Foo". For example, Category:Rural localities in Selemdzhinsky District is et up as a sub-category of Category:Populated places in Selemdzhinsky District, which does not exist.
Per WP:REDNOT,
A page in any Wikipedia namespace should never be left in a red-linked category. Either the category should be created, or else the non-existent category link should be removed or changed to one that exists.
Because this is an error, it is tracked at Special:WantedCategories, where editors try to fix the problems.
Your edits have flooded Special:WantedCategories with 117 entries, which you can see at http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Special:WantedCategories&limit=500&offset=500
Please fix this as soon as possible.
Thanks,--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Hi, there! Working in progress. Thank you. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Done It (seem) has been done. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Many thanks, Wagino. That was quick!
- I just checked Special:WantedCategories again, and I see that I missed two categories which are listed on the first page of Special:WantedCategories: Category:Rural localities in Bauntovsky District and Category:Rural localities in Kurchaloyevsky District. Both of those seem to relate to your work, so please can you also fix those two?
- Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Done You're welcome and thank you for your correction. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- That's great, Wagino. Thanks for your quick work, and also for being so nice about this. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Done You're welcome and thank you for your correction. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @BrownHairedGirl: Done It (seem) has been done. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Self-revert?
[edit]Hey, did you mean to self-revert your update here - [2]? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yes! Looks like i was wrong. Please check my edits. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:12, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ahh ok, just thought I'd make sure it wasn't a mistake :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, I like it because you always remind me. Thanks. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ahh ok, just thought I'd make sure it wasn't a mistake :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Tagging pages for speedy deletion
[edit]Hello, Wagino 20100516,
It looks like you are an experienced editor but you can't just tag a page "delete" and invent your own reason. Please review Criteria for Speedy Deletion so you are aware of the accepted and valid criteria for speedy deletion, when they apply and to which namespace they apply to. It also would help if you learn to use Twinkle, an editing tool, to tag pages for deletion. With Twinkle, when you tag pages for deletion, it opens up a small window that presents the variety of different criteria that may apply which you can pick from. It makes deletion tagging very easy and straight-forward and presents pages in a way that administrators who review them, are very familiar with.
When you invent your own reason for why a page should be deleted, an administrator has to try to understand your point and make their own guess on which criteria might apply which can be time-consuming and also means that your deletion requests will sit there until an admin comes along who doesn't mind doing this. Using the standard deletion criteria in an appropriate manner, makes it easier for admins who review deletion requests and are much less likely that your deletion requests will be denied. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, Liz,
- I rarely request removal so the general terms of a delete request are ignored. In the future I will follow the directions you gave. Thank you. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Page wth my credentials on Malay Wiki?
[edit]Hi Wagino;
I got a notice that a User Page CWH was set up in the Malay Wikipedia, apparently by you? It's here.
All the best ch (talk) 23:40, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- @CWH: Yes, the message coming from my bot. Nice to meet you. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 00:37, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Likewise, as I have seen your long record of service, but why did the bot set up the account? Should I do anything? ch (talk) 03:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- @CWH: It seem none, thank you. I'm submitted my bot status on id.wp, jv.wp, min.wp, and ms.wp wikis one of its jobs is to greeting all new users, so my bot is doing its job there. Unlike in en.wp which generally greets new users who have contributed, the 4 wikis allow (even encouraged) all new registered users to be greeted in a friendly manner so we hoping they are enthusiastic to contributing on the wikis. I'm sorry if my english is poorly. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for clearing this up, as well as for all your good work.ch (talk) 16:33, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- @CWH: It seem none, thank you. I'm submitted my bot status on id.wp, jv.wp, min.wp, and ms.wp wikis one of its jobs is to greeting all new users, so my bot is doing its job there. Unlike in en.wp which generally greets new users who have contributed, the 4 wikis allow (even encouraged) all new registered users to be greeted in a friendly manner so we hoping they are enthusiastic to contributing on the wikis. I'm sorry if my english is poorly. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
- Likewise, as I have seen your long record of service, but why did the bot set up the account? Should I do anything? ch (talk) 03:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari
[edit]I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.
Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.
I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.
Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Peaceray: Thank you has invited me to join the discussion. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 06:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Wagino 20100516!
[edit]Wagino 20100516,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 02:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 02:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Moops: Thank you and happy new year too! -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 10:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Wrong comment on Indonesian Wikipedia (Komentar yang keliru pada Wikipedia Indonesia)
[edit]Hai, Wagino 20100516, saya hanya ingin menyampaikan bahwa komentar anda sebagai pengurus pada Wikipedia Indonesia keliru, saya tidak pernah diblokir secara global, harap segera anda ralat. Saya terkena blokir sewenang-wenang di Wikipedia Indonesia justru karena penyalahgunaan alat pengurus oleh pengurus dengan nama pengguna Herryz. Sampai sekarang belum ada respon dari pengurus-pengurus lain terkait penyalahgunaan tersebut di WP:WKK. Salam. Jellylovers (talk) 22:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Jellylovers: Sebenarnya tidak sepenuhnya keliru, hanya saja saya kurang lengkap menjelaskan 2 akun tersebut dan saat ini sudah saya berikan penjelasan tambahan. Terkait masalah blokir yang sedang berlaku saat ini silakan anda ajukan keberatan/ peninjauan kembali di halaman pembicaraan anda karena ruang tersebut tidak ikut diblokir. Terima kasih. -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 17:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 November 2023
[edit]- In the media: Propaganda and photos, lunatics and a lunar backup
- News and notes: Update on Wikimedia's financial health
- Traffic report: If it bleeds, it leads
- Recent research: Canceling disputes as the real function of ArbCom
- Wikimania: Wikimania 2024 scholarships
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 December 2023
[edit]- In the media: Turmoil on Hebrew Wikipedia, grave dancing, Olga's impact and inspiring Bhutanese nuns
- Disinformation report: "Wikipedia and the assault on history"
- Comix: Bold comics for a new age
- Essay: I am going to die
- Featured content: Real gangsters move in silence
- Traffic report: And it's hard to watch some cricket, in the cold November Rain
- Humour: Mandy Rice-Davies Applies
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
[edit]- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
The Signpost: 10 January 2024
[edit]- From the editor: NINETEEN MORE YEARS! NINETEEN MORE YEARS!
- Special report: Public Domain Day 2024
- Technology report: Wikipedia: A Multigenerational Pursuit
- News and notes: In other news ... see ya in court!
- WikiProject report: WikiProjects Israel and Palestine
- Obituary: Anthony Bradbury
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2023
- Comix: Conflict resolution
The Signpost: 31 January 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Wikipedian Osama Khalid celebrated his 30th birthday in jail
- Opinion: Until it happens to you
- Disinformation report: How paid editors squeeze you dry
- Recent research: Croatian takeover was enabled by "lack of bureaucratic openness and rules constraining [admins]"
- Traffic report: DJ, gonna burn this goddamn house right down
The Signpost: 13 February 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia Russia director declared "foreign agent" by Russian gov; EU prepares to pile on the papers
- Disinformation report: How low can the scammers go?
- Serendipity: Is this guy the same as the one who was a Nazi?
- Traffic report: Griselda, Nikki, Carl, Jannik and two types of football
- Crossword: Our crossword to bear
- Comix: Strongly
The Signpost: 2 March 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia enters US Supreme court hearings as "the dolphin inadvertently caught in the net"
- Recent research: Images on Wikipedia "amplify gender bias"
- In the media: The Scottish Parliament gets involved, a wikirace on live TV, and the Foundation's CTO goes on record
- Obituary: Vami_IV
- Traffic report: Supervalentinefilmbowlday
- WikiCup report: High-scoring WikiCup first round comes to a close
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
[edit]- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
The Signpost: 25 April 2024
[edit]- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics, and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
[edit]- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
[edit]- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
[edit]- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
In case you return to editing, please don't continue to do this, neither on its own (~2020), nor as part of a larger edit (2021~2022). ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 15:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Tom.Reding Thank you for your guidance. -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:31, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
[edit]- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
[edit]- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
[edit]- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
The Signpost: 18 November 2024
[edit]ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)