User talk:Vladisfox

Welcome!

Hello, Vladisfox, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page g-force has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. - DVdm (talk) 09:43, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vladisfox, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Vladisfox! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The end of the world according to Slava

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The end of the world according to Slava, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 20:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

~~This is the best article ever made by anyone in the world. I had to delete it, because it is too good to exist. Thanks.~~ In fact, what I posted was "Wikipedia is not a place for prophets to have their prophecies published. Should a prophecy turn out to actually happen, and if it is documented on reliable independent sources WP:RS both before and after, those of us that are left here will give due consideration to inclusion. Until then, there's always sudoku if you get bored.". Peridon (talk) 21:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that talk page posts should not normally be refactored, and definitely not when they contain a warning from an administrator. Peridon (talk) 14:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS No-one who works in the deletion area of Wikipedia would believe that I said what you changed it to. Peridon (talk) 14:54, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Donald Trump has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Donald Trump was changed by Vladisfox (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893763 on 2016-09-19T22:37:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Donald Trump. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits to the September 19 Article

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --TommyBoy (talk) 22:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 23:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]