User talk:Viskonsas

Image:Redacesquadron.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Redacesquadron.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. // Pilot guy radar contact 20:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

needs an arbitrator in Žemaitėška wikipedia

Sorry, I know this is not the Žemaitėška wikipedia. Though I was blocked by Hugo.arg. So I need your help as an administrater in Žemaitėška wikipedia. I have a trouble with a administrater Hugo.arg on wikipedia of Žemaitėška. I need you as an arbitrator.

story

I and Hugo.arg were talking on the article name of Dokdo Salas. I recommended Liancourt salas, though he didn't accepted. (see Aptarimas:Dokdo-Takešima salas) In the while, Hugo.arg suddenly move the article to Dokdo-Takešima salas, although I and Hugo.arg have not reached such an agreement. I believe, as a wikipedian with NPOV, the article Dokdo-Takešima salas should be Liancourt salas. The people on each wikipedia is admitting Liancourt is a neutral name. yes, Lithuanian wikipedia also admitted Liancourt salos is a neutral name. though, Hugo.arg didn't accept it with his own belief. and he finally changed the name Dokdo-Takešima salas with the words:"I think to use Dokdo - Takeshima also could be NPOV. Hugo.arg 16:59, 2007 rogpjūtė 21 (UTC)". (currently he put the name back. though you can see he actually changed the name, according to the moving log of Aptarimas:Dokdo-Takešima salas) I can't belive that administrator Hugo.arg changed without agreements while talking. He seems to think the article belongs to him only. at least his behavior is in such a way. He is a first editor of the Dokdo-Takešima salas. so I need the third person's arbitration as an administrator. can you be an arbitrator? and could you cancel my blocking in Žemaitėška wikipedia, if possible. my account is same name in Žemaitėška wikipedia. why should I get the penalty? he actually didn't agree with me though he moved the page. so I blamed him for the vandalism. did I do wrong? I don't think so. and finally He gave me a penalty 1 week blocking. is it a fair? --Boldlyman

Hello

Hi, thanks for getting in touch with me. I actually was a sysop on Tibetan Wikipedia, but it was on a temporary basis, and I became a lot busier in my personal life so I didn't have much time to help with Tibetan Wikipedia. Still, if you or anybody else seems something there that needs to be done, they or you can contact me on my English Wikipedia user page, and I will try to help.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 03:33, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Volapük Cifapad

Please do not add unasked-for changes to the Main Page of the Volapük Wikipedia. There is no reason for that. If you have questions or suggestions, you can always write them down on the Cifapad talk page, or on my own talk page. Smeira, 01:07 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kursas.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kursas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1jp-ltzod.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1jp-ltzod.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pyongyang

I had that in my sights to develop sometime but I see you've done it. I strongly recomend creating Template:Districts of Pyongyang to connect them ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 16:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Asking for a favour

I've never met you or seen you before.. I'll help you anyways. So is "..." the current username and the one you want to create is ",,,"?

Changing username: "ユーザー名を"..."から",,,"に変えてください。"
Reason: "ウィキペディア上すべてのユーザー名を同じにしたいからです。"

If "..." and ",,," aren't the usernames, just replace it with the actual one.. --staka (T ・C) 20:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ričardas Mikutavičius

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ričardas Mikutavičius, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ričardas Mikutavičius. Ursasapien (talk) 11:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply to your question on my talkpage. Ursasapien (talk) 11:59, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alfa.lt

A tag has been placed on Alfa.lt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 19:50, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Award

		The Lithuanian Barnstar of National Merit
		For your spectacular job on Lithuania related articles. Keep up! M.K. (talk) 07:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
		_{this WikiAward was given to Viskonsas by M.K. (talk) on 07:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

List of vehicles in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of vehicles in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of vehicles in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 13:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot

I just declined to block your bot; it was listed automatically at WP:UAA. I see that it does not have a bot status bit yet -- is it approved here? Is it at least approved somewhere? Are you in the process of seeking approval for it? Mango juice^talk 11:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Volapük Wikipedia

I have nominated Volapük Wikipedia, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volapük Wikipedia. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Miremare 22:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:List of wikipedias by sample of articles

The size of the articles is calculated a characters (not bytes). And in the case of lt:Aleksandras Puškinas, it is about 27k characters. Paste in the contents into MSWord and look at the statistics window. Wikipedia displays size as bytes which is very different for non-Latin alphabets. --MarsRover (talk) 04:34, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Macernis.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Macernis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 22:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Macernis.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Macernis.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:24, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MauritsBot@bowiki

Hello Viskonsas,

Because my bot does more than only interwiki (cosmetic changes), I will need local consensus according to meta bot-policy. Is there a local discussion page for the approval of bots? I am asking this on en.wiki because my IP has been blocked too.

Kind regards, --Maurits (talk) 10:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maurits. I am glad to hear from you. Your bot has done a good job in Tibetan wikipedia before I blocked it, sorry. Since Tibetan wikipedia is so small, there is no exact page for the approval of bots, so please make a formal request in the local community portal and then in meta. Do not forget to write that there are no bureaucrats there in bo.wiki and post the link to the local community portal. Best regards. -- Wisconsus ^TALK|^things 12:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reaction, I will act as told. Could you unblock my IP-address so that I can make the request on the local community portal? I temporarily excluded bowiki from the bot's working list, so that it will not abuse the unblock. Kind regards, --Maurits (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have already ublocked you. Would you like me to unblock your bot in advance? -- Wisconsus ^TALK|^things 19:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the unblock, I made the request. Regards, --Maurits (talk) 11:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you also make a request in meta.wiki? As I said there are no bureaucrats in bo.wiki, so you need to ask stewards in meta to have your bot flag granted. -- Wisconsus ^TALK|^things 11:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The request page om meta states: "don't list your bot here if you haven't consulted the wiki for at least a week". Therefore, I'll file the request there on July 16. --Maurits (talk) 12:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regional beetle lists

Hi! You placed a {{move}} tag on Category:Regional beetle lists. Firstly, that tag is not meant for categories. For proposing category renames, follow the steps described at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. (If you have problems with the nomination, drop me a message on my talk page and I'll try to help you out.) Secondly, when you do use the tag, it's supposed to be placed on the talk page, not on the article page itself. Oh, and the template's supposed to be substituted (so, write {{subst:move|NewName}} instead of just {{move|NewName}}). Let me know if my explanation doesn't seem to make sense :) Regards, Jafeluv (talk) 20:05, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanation and sorry for getting you into trouble. -- Wisconsus ^TALK|^things 14:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of disambiguation page Antanas Pocius

I just deleted the page Antanas Pocius (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch, which was tagged with WP:CSD#G6 as uncontroversial, with the explanation: "because it is holding up a page move or page history merge that is non-controversial or consensual, for instance reversing a redirect, or removing a disambiguation page that only points to a single article. The page to be moved to this name is Antanas Pocius (1913–1983)." But after I did so, I realized that it might not have been so uncontroversial. Since you were the editor who introduced the disambiguation, I thought I'd let you know. — Sebastian 01:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are as many as 4 people holding such name and surname - 3 choirmasters ([3],[4],[5] and 1 politician ([6]), so I think it is fairly enough to create an article for disambiguation, despite the fact that there are no articles about the other three (so far). -- Wisconsus ^TALK|^things 13:19, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarification. If you don't mind, I will copy this discussion to Talk:Antanas Pocius and reply to it there. (I may not be watching this page anymore. If you would like to continue the conversation, please do so here and let me know.) — Sebastian 16:38, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Viskonsas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Povilas Vasiliauskas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Miyoko Akashi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ucina:guci

Hello Viskonsas,

There might be an older term around somewhere, probably from Classical Chinese, but the term that would probably be used nowadays is jitin, which is basically just the Okinawan reading of the Chinese word 辞典. I think, however, most people nowadays would just use the Japanese term (which is not that different anyhow, since they are both borrowed from the same Middle Chinese word). Searching for technical terms in Okinawan won't get you so far, generally, most of the linguistic treasure chest that Ryukyuan languages have to offer is found in places besides words for dictionaries, universities, airplanes or televisions. Perhaps you have heard, for example, the saying "Nuci du takara"... when the citizens of the Ryukyu Kingdom were preparing arms to defend their independence against the invading Japanese clan of Satsuma in 1609, King Sho Nei implored his citizens to not resist with violence, but to instead be peaceful because, as that phrase means, life itself is a treasure. On a note related to "dictionary", the word for book is sumuci and the word for "word" is kutuba. --ಠ_ಠ node.ue ಠ_ಠ (talk) 13:54, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jehovah's Witnesses in Japan

The article Jehovah's Witnesses in Japan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No third-party sources. JW activities in Japan are typical of JW activities in many countries. Statistics covered at Jehovah's Witnesses by country.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeffro77 (talk) 03:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Radži, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miyoko Akashi

The article Miyoko Akashi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable per WP:DIPLOMAT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Klein zach 11:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miyoko Akashi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miyoko Akashi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miyoko Akashi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Old Town may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Vilnius Old Town|Senamiestis]] in [[Vilnius]] (a part of [[UNESCO Heritage Site|UNESCO]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dzongkha Wikipedia

Hi, thanks for getting in touch with me on my user page on the Dzongkha Wikipedia. If you want a sysop there, I van try to do it - but I need to know just what is involved.
Chris Fynn (talk) 19:40, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vytenis Andriukaitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resistance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Socialist People's Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tolerance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Povilas Meškėla

The article Povilas Meškėla has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Povilas Meškėla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Viskonsas. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alfa.lt

The article Alfa.lt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia:Notability (media) and Wikipedia:Notability (websites)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:28, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Viskonsas. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of JBC (group)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JBC (group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of JBC (group) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JBC (group) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JBC (group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 18:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Viskonsas. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"List of vehicles in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of vehicles in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 18#List of vehicles in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 12:56, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of African immigrants to Lithuania

The article African immigrants to Lithuania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article has been tagged as potential original research and lacking citations, but more seriously it has absolutely nothing to say. I can't see the remotest trace of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elemimele (talk) 08:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Japanese-Lithuanian Hieroglyphs Dictionary

The article Japanese-Lithuanian Hieroglyphs Dictionary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]