User talk:Vamsiraj
Welcome and introduction
[edit]Hi, Vamsiraj. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck! Chzz ► 16:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
![]()
Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia! -- Chzz ► 16:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1c/Citation-needed-vertical.svg/150px-Citation-needed-vertical.svg.png)
Hi Vamsiraj,
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/S.R.Anandbabu, Journalist. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.
However... it doesn't seem to have correctly formatted references.
All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.
If you put a reference like this:
Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref> He likes tea.<ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>
...then the reference will automatically be displayed as a small number[1], and the number will link to the details, wherever there is a {{reflist}} — there should be one of those in a section titled == References ==.
You can see that example in action on this page: User:Chzz/demo/simpleref.
Your submission will be reviewed as soon as possible, and we'll try to help with it, but it would help us a lot if you could add inline references.
If you need any other kind of help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question. Best, Chzz ► 16:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}}
to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha Quadrant talk 03:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Bazj (talk) 09:15, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Wgolf (talk) 18:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/fd/Puppeter_template.svg/40px-Puppeter_template.svg.png)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sadman Sakib Shapnil SSS, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.