User talk:VOIDDED
March 2024
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australian Labor Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization Talk 03:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- No doubt you saw the note that says "It is important to seek and gain broad consensus on the article talk page before changing this" with regard to a number of the changes you have made, which have already been reverted once. If you do so again without following that instruction, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization Talk 03:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I saw the note attached to the other user's edit changing the political position and I thought they did not seek consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VOIDDED (talk • contribs) 03:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I see what you are referring to, and I have restored the version prior to the other editor's edits. General Ization Talk 03:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Though my last edit of the page had no inclusion of the Third Way and is essentially identical to the current version of the page and you effectively undid my last edit for no reason. VOIDDED (talk) 03:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- To see the difference between your last edit and the current state of the page, click here. I don't see any consensus for the changes you made that have now been removed. General Ization Talk 03:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am referring to the last edit I made, not the changes made without consensus, though it doesn't matter. VOIDDED (talk) 03:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- To see the difference between your last edit and the current state of the page, click here. I don't see any consensus for the changes you made that have now been removed. General Ization Talk 03:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Though my last edit of the page had no inclusion of the Third Way and is essentially identical to the current version of the page and you effectively undid my last edit for no reason. VOIDDED (talk) 03:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I see what you are referring to, and I have restored the version prior to the other editor's edits. General Ization Talk 03:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- I saw the note attached to the other user's edit changing the political position and I thought they did not seek consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VOIDDED (talk • contribs) 03:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! General Ization Talk 03:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)