User talk:User68732

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

User68732 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is ridiculous. I used 3 different IP address for my account. My IP address should not be the same as any other editors.

Decline reason:

Administrators familiar with the case have concluded that you seem to be a sockpuppet, and CheckUser has confirmed this. I hate to say this, but somebody has to review this, so: better luck next time. Sorry. -- Luna Santin 03:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:3RR rule violation

You are restoring comments by a banned user and have violated the WP:3RR rule once already. I give you some time to restore the deletion. If not, I will report the diffs to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Snle.--Niohe 20:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please remove the tag from my user page, or I will report this as vandalism on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Snle.--Niohe 20:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

I must warn you, if you behave like User:Snle, you will be treated like Snle. There's a suspicion that you are Snle anyway, and even if that's not proven policy states that you may be treated as a sockpuppet if you behave like him. This means that restoring edits by banned users is a bad idea. WP:BAN states that "any edits made in defiance of a ban may be reverted to enforce the ban, regardless of the merits of the edits themselves". If you continue in this disruptive manner, you will be blocked from editing. Khoi khoi 21:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? I'm talking about you specificially reverting to a banned user's version of the page. Khoi khoi 21:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

People are only considered sockpuppets when there behavior has a startling similarity to that of another user. We are able to confirm these sockpuppets by comparing their IP addresses through checkuser. Khoi khoi 21:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point out some examples? Khoi khoi 01:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]