User talk:Upelon

RfC comment request

The RfC at Talk:Belize Defence Force#RFC on usage of image2 parameter on infobox may interest previous editor on this topics. Input welcome. Ckfasdf (talk) 00:14, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Belize Defence Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M18.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Belize Coast Guard

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Belize Coast Guard, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Belize Defence Force

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Belize Defence Force, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Belize Defence Force

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Belize Defence Force, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Belize Defence Force Air Wing. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. But understand us as well - we look for information in various hard-to-find sources, we check it in other resources, we look for photos, etc. And if you find a mistake somewhere, take it and please fix it yourself. Because it is not the first time when a note is written, the information is deleted and everything has to be searched from the beginning. Wiki correcting people who have jobs and families and do not sit at the computer all day. So be understanding if you find a mistake and correct it. Upelon (talk) 01:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is another thing. I had to notice that there are people in the Wiki who are competing with each other to add more reports, but only one or the other wiki page is corrected. Upelon (talk) 01:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And the second thing. I have been editing the Wiki for more than 10 years, and I have never reported anything. Although I had to see a very, very, very gross intentional and unintentional mistakes. Upelon (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]