User talk:Unknown Unknowns

The Moors Murderers Band

There are plenty of sources regarding Topper Headon's involvement in this band including this one in The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/music/musicblog/2015/feb/13/steve-strange-banishing-of-the-mavericks-pop-musics-loss
Unknown Unknowns (talk) 14:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And The Scotsman
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-scotsman/20150214/282497182097295
Unknown Unknowns (talk) 14:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to
Unknown Unknowns (talk) 14:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove Topper Headon's name from this article. The newspaper articles you are referring to above are not reliable sources as they themselves do not refer to a reliable source. They repeat hearsay based on false statements possibly made by Tex Exile, aka Anthony Doughty. I refer to a Punk77 blog post: http://www.punk77.co.uk/groups/moors_murderers_the%20band.htm Please note that Topper Headon himself categorically denies his involvement in this band. The allegations are contentious as potentially defamatory.

I refer you to Wikipedia's policy on Biographies of living persons: WP:GRAPEVINE and removal policy: WP:BLPREMOVE

82.71.39.132 (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toft

Please go to the article talk page to discuss this further. You have already reverted four times on this and are therefore in breach of WP:3RR. I'd strongly advise that discussion is the way forward on this now. - SchroCat (talk) 08:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't edit the Albert Toft page on the 24/07/13 and I edited it twice on the 25/07/13. Please could you tell me how I have broken the 3-Revert rule?
The term 'English' is unambiguous in the UK but in the USA (and other countries) it's used interchangably with 'British'. A disambiguation link is necessary.
May I ask why you've suddenly taken an interest in the Albert Toft page? Almost all your other edits are cinema-related.

Unknown Unknowns (talk) 11:53, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Unknown Unknowns reported by User:SchroCat (Result: ) - SchroCat (talk) 12:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined to block you at this point, but please be aware that continually reverting other editors is disruptive and may lead to blocks in the future. See here for details: WP:EW. Please discuss the issue on the talk page instead. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm keeping an eye on SchroCat to make sure that he doesn't try this sort of thing again. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 11:32, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lummis article

the merge was decided Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Canon_William_Lummis <--- here. Kwsn^(Ni!) 16:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright

You sort of misformed the AfD when you made it, nothing major, happens to people on their first ones. Just give me a minute to do something else and I'll take a good look at it. Kwsn^(Ni!) 12:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took at a look at it, and I must say, the second paragraph you had was a very good point. Also, for future reference, check out this section on how to list AfD's.

Invitation

Hello there

I see you are interested in the Life On Mars Television Series, as I am.

At the moment I have A Life On Mars Wikiproject currently up for approval by the Wikiproject Approval Council. As you are interested in Life On Mars I was wondering if you would be interested in adding your name and joining. If you are interested you can find it on Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals its right at the very bottom you cant miss it as its titled ‘Wikipedia: Wikiproject Life on Mars (Television Series)’. And after your name is added to Wikiproject propsals please add it to the main page Wikipedia:Wikiproject Life On Mars

If you are interested by all means feel free to join

Regards

Police,Mad,Jack —Preceding comment was added at 20:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Denim has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ ^echo 12:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The word 'denim' is derived from the French phrase 'serge de Nimes' (please see the article). I assume you have no objections if I reinstate it in the 'French words and phases' category? Unknown Unknowns (talk) 12:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite sorry; not sure why I reverted that, probably got confused with another edit. · AndonicO ^Hail! 13:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No kidding

Who are you suggesting doesn't know or hasn't read the denim article? - Denimadept (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allstarecho when he reverted the original edit as 'vandalism', on the 5 February 2008. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SAving private ryan

It's because they are notable in themselves - as someone had already told you They're notable pure and simple. If a soverign entity like the Republic of Ireland lends troops to participate in the filming of a movie that's notable. If members of a small hobby group get jobs as extras in a film that isn't. RI army doing something = notable, a few hobbists doing something = not. Unless Steve S said "I must have X involved in the film", then that would make them notable. --Fredrick day (talk) 12:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bring the page to my attention - looking at it, they don't seem notable to me - I'll AFD it a bit later, I expect it will be then be deleted - good job spotting that. I'd do it now but I'm setting up a new PC and don't have the concentration for it. --Fredrick day (talk) 13:00, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So you removed a link from 'Saving Private Ryan' to another Wikipedia page without even reading it? How do you justify your administrator status? Unknown Unknowns (talk) 13:26, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

don't be a child

Get a blog if you want to do light comedy. --Fredrick day (talk) 11:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been banned, at last. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 07:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hitler

Source that, please. And the song "Hitler has only got one ball" won't do it. Bishonen | talk 13:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The source is an article in The Daily Telegraph which states that Hitler was injured in the groin during WW1. I haven't reinstated the speculation about the lost testicle. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 08:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aghadrumsee

I notice you have an interest in the townland of Aghadrumsee, may I ask why?

Also, if you are willing, Id like to ask for your help in expanding the articles of the local townlands, in and around Killyfole.

KDDA (talk) 16:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in the South Fermanagh area as I spent my early childhood there. Unfortunately I don't know much about the place so I restrict my activities to looking out for vanadalism, checking references, fixing links (etc). I hope you're successful in expanding these articles - some of them definitely need it!

Unknown Unknowns (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I get the impression that the sysop's are not very happy with the information I'm posting as it is original research. The problem is that there is a severe lack of information regard this area and the KDDA want to change that. I originally thought that the wikipedia would be an ideal place to compile this local knowledge, before the the town-lands in Fermanagh are lost like in so many other places in Ireland. This allows many people to challenge the information, like the translation of Aghadrumsee. Please see this link I personally believe this translation, from "Aghadromsillagh" makes more sense. The reason for this is that there is also a "Coolnassillagh" in the area. I think over time, and the fact that the map makes at the time were translating it "as heard" the name has been corupted. The orginal name of "Aghadromsillagh" would mean "Field on the hillock of Sally trees"

Do you know anything about wikipedia templates?

KDDA (talk) 15:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've never used Wikipedia templates but if you search for that text you'll find a page on them.

I think the main thing with Wikipedia is that you should cite sources for what you write. I've changed the Aghadrumsee etymology section for that reason, better sourced material always takes precedence. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 16:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe both translations have equal merit and are both worth a mention. The fact is that whatever happened to the original name it has ended up as "Aghadrumsee", this could have been by purpose/design. Until evidence is found to contrary, both translation should be included. Whats your thoughts on this matter?

KDDA (talk) 17:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree so I've included the original text but made clear that it's only folklore. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 11:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to throw a spanner in the works, I found Aghadrumsee referred to as "Black Dogs Lane"! There is a legend of a large black dog with huge flaming eyes. However, it didn't seem to do anything other then pick its victims up on its back and give them a terror-stricken ride normally throwing them off into mud or into a gorse bush! Its so called victims are normally intoxicated at the time. LMAO Its related to the fairy's you spoke of, as a fairy dog! I think its called "Cu Sìth", possibly a "Púca". Thought you might be interested in hearing that one.

KDDA (talk) 22:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - the black dog myth is a fairly common one in the British Isles - and even Latin America! Unknown Unknowns (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jazz Mellor

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jazz Mellor. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz Mellor. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your help

Hi again,

I don't know if your remember me talking about setting up another wiki. Well I have set one up and was wondering would you like to help out?

KDDA (talk) 23:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see your email. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 12:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neco Scooters for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Neco Scooters, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neco Scooters until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Biker Biker (talk) 23:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Neco Scooters. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 09:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The template was removed in good faith, please see the Neco talk page. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 09:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that. I have now reinstated the template to the page. --Biker Biker (talk) 10:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For reference, that same message appears in every AfD-nominated article. I can see how it would cause confusion, it made me look twice. --Biker Biker (talk) 10:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fenwick Groupe

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Fenwick Groupe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Inks.LWC (talk) 08:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you not nominate pages for speedy deletion unless they clearly violate Wikipedia's rules? This page did not and has been retained, but only because another editor intervened in time. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 19:28, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:UnknownUnknownsSchool.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UnknownUnknownsSchool.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Strange Passerby (talk • cont) 12:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Unknown Unknowns, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Unknown Unknowns. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.
Shut off the bot here.
Report errors here.
If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Royal Wolverhampton School logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royal Wolverhampton School logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vespa on Indonesia

I added some stuff to Indonesia section of Vespa entry. Indonesian history of Vespa is rarely undocumented. Some blog wrote supposed to be a newspaper article, but I couldn't find the article on internet written by its own publisher.

My reference relied heavily on Flickr's collection of a Vespa Indonesia employee Pak Jorgen on his 1972-1976 Jakarta assignment.

Danmotors Vespa Indonesia pricelist 1976/1977
Newspaper article on 1973 about Danmotors Vespa Indonesia
A visit to Jayapura (eastern Indonesia) Vespa dealer
Vespa showroom in 1972, workshop, and training room
Pictures of Vespa plant in Jakarta:
- Photo 1
- Photo 2
- Photo 3
- Photo 4
- Photo 5
- Photo 6
- Photo 7

A googling reveals:

Malaysia's New Strait Times issue of Oct 30, 1987 vacancy at PT Danmotor
An translated excerpt from Tempo magazine archive — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.243.53.81 (talk) 15:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr and blogs aren't reliable sources but I've added something based on the Tempo article. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 22:35, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your addition, this book on page 43 described more details about PT Danmotors Vespa Indonesia existence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.243.53.81 (talk) 07:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:C plus plus book.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:C plus plus book.PNG, which you've sourced to (Book Cover). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Unknown Unknowns. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_February_20#Category:People_educated_at_Royal_Wolverhampton_School.
Message added 23:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jazz Mellor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jazz Mellor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jazz Mellor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheGrappler (talk) 02:59, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgekid94

Hi there. Thanks for stopping by my talkpage. But it was actually a bot who invited Bridgekid94 to the Teahouse, rather than me. The Teahouse just autopopulates the Invite with one of the host names to make it more "human". Cheers, --Rosiestep (talk) 13:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paper Bicycle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossbar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for page protection

Please put these on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, not Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. MadGuy7023 (talk) 12:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Photons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New wave. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Martin Smith, SWP

The edits you have made recently to Martin Smith and SWP violated the biographies of living persons policy, which requires excellent sourcing for what you were trying to add. If you wish to discuss this matter further, do so only via email to myself or the functionaries team. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the information I added was already in the public domain. Martin Smith could have already taken legal proceedings against various websites (or lodged formal complaints with various universities and student bodies) if he had wished to dispute it. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 10:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That the information is easily found online is irrelevant, in fact. Unless and until it is carried by a reliable source, it cannot appear on Wikipedia. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You Have Been Whaled!

Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

It is generally considered manners to ask an editors permission before you move their draft into mainspace. I'm talking about Ruth Archer which you appear to have copied from here. If you were not sure if the draft was finished or not then the best thing to do would be to contact the editor and ask if the draft was ready for mainspace. Any questions, please do not hesitate to ask.--5 albert square (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On a more serious note, an author—including a Wikipedian—owns the copyright to their own writing. Although all text on Wikipedia is licensed to allow editing and redistribution, the original author still retains copyright, and by failing to attribute them you violate their copyright and breach the terms of the license. More generally, it's just rude to copy something wholesale from somebody's userspace and paste in mainspace without so much as a by your leave. Please don't do that kind of thing again (and if you've done it elsewhere, please let me know so I can tidy it up), and when you get a minute please read WP:CWW. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to know two things: Why did you not contact me to ask about the status of the draft? It's obvious from my contributions that I'm an active editor, so I would have replied to your inquiry. And, more importantly, why did you do it? I didn't consider my draft to be finished and I wasn't ready to move it. I have spent years working on that article, and I was quite hurt to see that all my time and effort had been for nothing. - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for upsetting you. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort so I didn't think I was doing anything wrong. 5 albert square seems to have put things right now. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 09:25, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Strummer / Lily Allen stuff

I won't repeat the whole bit here, but I responded to your contribution on the Joe Strummer talk page. Would appreciate your input. Thanks140.163.0.5 (talk) 17:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Gopsill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaya. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Unknown Unknowns. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

92.41.35.8 (talk) 10:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Auteco2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Auteco2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Unknown Unknowns. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Unknown Unknowns. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forklifts

A forklift (also called lift truck, jitney, fork truck, fork hoist, and forklift truck) is a powered industrial truck. Rathfelder (talk) 13:39, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK - but they still made motor-scooters, which made them a motor vehicle manufacturer. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 13:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SouthStaffordshireKnot.jpg

The file File:SouthStaffordshireKnot.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mork & Mindy

Mork did later on marry Mindy. Here is the clip that shows that: Mork Marries Mindy. It is also mentioned in the article itself. Davidgoodheart. (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've already corrected the article. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 10:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jonathan Pedley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Pedley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Pedley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tacyarg (talk) 22:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

James Cleverly

No, the removal of sourced content does not constitute vandalism. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism#Blanking,_illegitimate. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 22:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which quite clearly states: Content removal is not considered to be vandalism when the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary. Blanking that could be legitimate includes blanking all or part of a biography of a living person. Wikipedia is especially concerned about providing accurate and unbiased information on the living; blanking may be an effort to remove inaccurate or biased material. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 22:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which wasn't true in this case. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 11:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Except that it very obviously was. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 15:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you're lonely and want somebody to talk to then try a chatroom. Unknown Unknowns (talk) 19:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

? Tim O'Doherty (talk) 19:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]