User talk:Uberisaac

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome from Redwolf24

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes ([[User:Redwolf24|Redwolf24]] 08:19, 12 July 2005 (UTC)) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes ([[User:Redwolf24|Redwolf24]]) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current date and time is 4 November 2024 T 01:10 UTC.

P.S. I like messages :-P

Thanks!!

Hey Isaac, just dropping by a thank you note for your support vote. I hope you've been editing well lately. Also you know where to find me if you need help. Redwolf24 (Talk) 21:31, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

University of St Andrews

Hi there,

I graduated in 2001 and had experience of fair few different schools (School of Greek, Latin and Ancient History, School of Mathematics, School of Physics and Astronomy, School of Divinity, School of Modern Languages and School of Philosophical and Anthropological Studies) and would have to say that, in general, teaching was good to excellent. I did find some of the Physics and Maths lecures could be a bit "uninspiring" but the Tutorials and Labs were always top rate.

St Andrews has more than its fair share of eccentricities, but is a great place to study as it is such a tight-nit student community. As you are living on campus and the campus is also the town it is great place from the point of view of familiarity. There are people who are "stuck up" like you might find at Bristol, Durham or Oxbridge but most people are "regular" students. I would wholehearedly recommend anyone study at St Andrews.

Davidkinnen 20:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

University of St Andrews

I see you've already had one reply! I echo everything the previous responder says, except to say that I loved most of my first and second year maths and physics lecturers. I'm yet to see what Honours years will throw at me, but I'm looking forward to them. St Andrews is whatever you make it. The town, architechture wise is very traditional (for the most part), and there's a fair proportion of those that like to keep up tradition, but if you're not into that, then nobody's going to tell you you have to be into tradition. The countryside is barely a stone's throw and is beautiful. Just taking the journey from Edinburgh to St Andrews takes you through some nice rolling lowlands. We have a fairly active hillwalking society, so you should join them, should you choose to come here!

As for computer facilities, we have a fair few 24-hour computing labs, and all halls have 24-hour computing facilities. All rooms in halls have an ethernet port for fast internet access. Hope this is of some help - anything else, don't be afraid to message me again! M0RHI | Talk to me 23:45, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

University of St Andrews

I can really only echo what the previous two posters have said with regards to the town and the university in general. (Incidently, I know M0RHI in real life). I can go into more details on the Computer Science department though. In first year, you study two computer science modules, focusing on Java and programming basics, and some Internet-based programming, again in Java. Second year takes things a step further with algorithms and more fundamental aspects of computing. I've just started my second year, so can't really comment on later years, but the course is good. St Andrews is rated as the best university in Scotland for comp sci by the Guardian, IIRC, and the second best in the UK. The facilities are excellent - indeed, the 2nd year lab has just been kitted out with new 20" iMacs (very nice indeed) - a variety of systems are available and widely used over your four years here. Visit on an open day if you can, it's worth checking out. Good luck! orudge 22:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Harry Potter

Hello, Uberisaac. Over at WikiProject Harry Potter we're trying to compile a list of active participants. Your name, along with all other project participants, has been placed on the inactive list. If you'd like to get involved again, please place your name back on the active list, and take a look at the project talk page for the latest happenings.

RHB(AWB) 23:42, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Titus Groan.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Titus Groan.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gormenghast castle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gormenghast castle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gormenghast_article_old.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gormenghast_article_old.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gormenghast article new.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gormenghast article new.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:26, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Titus Groan (character) for deletion

The article Titus Groan (character) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titus Groan (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buff (clothing)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Buff (clothing), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. agtx 05:22, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Titus Groan(novel)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Titus Groan(novel) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 14 § Titus Groan(novel) until a consensus is reached. Nickps (talk) 23:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]