User talk:UNSC Trooper

Terran Federation

Chill out pal, on wiki stuff that's been deleted can be un-deleted with the click of a few buttons no problem. Unfortunately you've answered ur own question with that quote, it doesn't mention terrorism.

"there was a time just before they went down the drain when such crimes as Dillinger's were as common as dogfights. The Terror had not been just in North America"

Dillinger was a child killer, the word terror might as well be replaced with fear. It doesn't mention Terrorism, in the modern sense, the act/threat of violence committed for political or ideological goals. Ryan4314 (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've looked through my copy of the book, it says;

"Mr.Dubois was talking about the disorders that preceded the breakup of the North American Republic, back in XXth century. According to him, there was time just before they went down the drain when such crimes as Dillinger's were as common. The Terror had not been just in North America..."

Now don't get me wrong I love this book and Heinlein had incredible foresight considering it was written in 59'. However he was talking about the degradation of society, that's what it says on the Starship Troopers article (which is a featured article) here in case you just think this is my opinion. Anyway to say;

"that at the end of the 20th Century, the "North American Republic " was brought down by raging terrorist activity which took place all around the world, including Russia and the British Isles."

is quite a stretch! There's no mention of terrorism (the act/threat of violence committed for political or ideological goals) like what you wiki-linked to, besides to draw that conclusion would be what Wikipedia calls Original Research. Now I know this article has some serious OR problems [1]. So tell u what, ur edit's probably not doing any harm, it be cool if u could revert by tomorrow night and then me n u can get to work on fixing up the article, how does that sound? :) Ryan4314 (talk) 23:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Terran federation st.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Terran federation st.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: UNSC

At WP:HALO we decided it was best to have an article that could reach FA class rather than a stubby UNSC page. As you can see, I've begun adding plenty of details; the more game-guidish stuff that doesn't belong at Wikipedia can be found by going to Halopedia. By the by, thanks for taking over the Halo story page at HBO; I've always enjoyed the section. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 23:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, any chance you can get the timeline at HBO updated with the events of Halo 3? Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 21:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty busy at the moment, I'd have to read through the timeline to get Halo 3 down to the basics... but an important, definite date is March 3, 2553 as the date the memorial is dedicated, or when the war ends... (see the cinematic) not exactly sure which. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 00:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, split it up. I don't own the article, after all. :P I haven't really fleshed out all the components, but something like Species of StarCraft is what I've been keeping in my mind's eye (with development for each faction within the larger sections.) Just remember to keep it summarized... while I do know we need more in-universe details, we should remember we have to keep it balanced by the other stuff, so perhaps talk about the government and military in the same section (different paragraphs or whatnot.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 18:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: HBO

I think we should expand the section before we decide to spin them off. Really, the fan fiction aspect is not really what HBO is known for, and so while we need to include it for comprehensiveness, sources dictate a smaller portion in the article. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Confederate states marines.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Confederate states marines.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:34, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: UNSC

Yes, it is shaping up a lot better than I expected (in terms of volume of content.) That said, the main reason we merged UNSC into Factions of Halo still remains an issue: there's no info on reception that we could use to make a GA+ class article. I think it makes more sense to streamline the content we have and make sure its accessible for non-fans. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 13:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I suppose they could, but I kept those sections short and pictureless because they link to the main standalone articles. It's preference, though personally I'd rather use allowances of fair use images on the elements which don't have another article, but it depends what content shapes up. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 14:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might make more sense to mention them in the introduction of the UNSC section. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 15:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

but are they that important? They have mentions in the novels, but to a casual reader (besides reading about their roles in the individual articles about the novels) they aren't really that important- all you need to know is that they rebelled against the UNSC. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 16:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of United Nations Exploratory Force

I have nominated United Nations Exploratory Force, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations Exploratory Force. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ~Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 20:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IFD

As the image Image:UNEF TFW comic.jpg is now orphaned following the deletion of the article United Nations Exploratory Force‎, I've nominated it for speedy deletion. Regards. Justin talk 15:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced the FUR for Image:Halo3ODST.jpg is valid, so I've also nominated that for speedy deletion. Justin talk 23:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks!

Yeah it was a bit of work but it's worth it. I took Actual Idealism off during the change because the article didn't seem to mention fascism but after a bit more reading I agree it does belong on there so thanks for adding it. Cheers! Ecto (talk) 21:23, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfC Collect

Could you give your impressions of Collect at his RfC based on your interaction with him at Fascism (include other if there is any thnx). The RfC is here: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Collect Soxwon (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:JoseAntonio-DeRivera.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JoseAntonio-DeRivera.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Color" discussion

See Template talk:Nazism sidebar for my response to your post. Regards --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 14:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fascism in the political spectrum

The RfC on Fascism#Fascism in the political spectrum has now run one month and there are now two versions of the intro para:

Most scholars do not find the terms right and left very useful with regard to fascism, which incorporated elements of both left and right, rejected the main currents of leftist and rightist politics, and attracted adherents from both ends of the political spectrum. Hence, fascism can be called sui generis. Some scholars do place fascism squarely on the right or left.

Most academics describe fascism as extreme right, radical right, far right or ultra right; some calling it a mixture of authoritarian conservatism and right-wing nationalism. However, there exists a dissenting view that fascism represents radical centrism. Moreover, a number of writers highlight aspects of some types of fascist ideology which may typically be associated with the left.

Could you please comment at Talk:Fascism#RfC.

The Four Deuces (talk) 21:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Following this RfC, there is currently a proposal regarding the issue of whether or not it is appropriate to characterise fascism as "right-wing".

Even if you don't have much to say, it would be useful if you could let your view be known in order to help guide the discussion towards some sort of conclusion.

Please take a look: here.

Thank you. --FormerIP (talk) 23:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted you b/c for some reason you felt the need to delete more than 400 KB when you added your comment... Soxwon (talk) 17:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National Liberation Movement

Greetings. I see that you did a major rewrite of Template:Neo-fascism a couple of months ago. One of the links you added in the Organization section was to National Liberation Movement -- my question is, which one? There have been many organizations by that name, several of which are notable enough to have their own Wikipedia articles. Right now, the template is linking to a disambiguation page. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Left-wing nationalism

You opined in a deletion discussion on this article which is now being proposed for a merge. Collect (talk) 22:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:68.44.200.39

Warning

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at User talk:68.44.200.39. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the note. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an opinion

About if Pinochet were a fascist or not, or if the category should be added orkept on his page, would you mind dropping in on the talkpage?--Die4Dixie (talk) 20:26, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Political Compass

Do you see a single source here: http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2 Claiming that Pinochet was a free marketeer is controversial at best, but they don't even provide a source. I was right, a book list is NOT a source. (LVAustrian (talk) 20:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

How Can You Classify the Nazi Party As "Far Right" and Say That I'm Not Neutral When...

you identify yourself as "right wing"? I can only hope that you don't identify yourself as a right-wing Nazi. Either way, you scare me and don't seem to have any problem trying to block, remove, and otherwise attack and silence those who disagree with you. Also, I seem to be one of quite a few people who have had problems with some of your comments and activities on Wikipedia.

Nickidewbear (talk) 10:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Re: How Can You Classify the Nazi Party As "Far Right" and Say That I'm Not Neutral When...

"Nick; Firstly, I identify myself as a right-wing national conservative. Secondly, I never blocked, attacked, or silenced anyone who disagrees with my comments."

I asked you to address a specific incident, not whether you've done it generally.

"I removed claims that the Nazi Party is far-left because they're based on fringe, biased literature and thus not part of mainstream opinions. Thirdly, marching on my talk page and saying I scare you and you don't like me and asserting other peoples' experiences with my comments as a basis for your complaint when YOU yourself have been warned multiple times of your vandalistic editing, hardly entitles you to claim I'm unreasonable. --UNSC Trooper (talk) 11:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC)"[reply]

I'm just pointing to the facts, and vandalism is calling the Nazi Party "far left" when extreme socialism is absolutely far left? Also, the mainstream isn't always right. For example, the mainstream used to be a bunch of WASP, racist, anti-Semitic, White supremacist, and anti-Catholic chauvinists who called Blacks, Jews, other minorites, and women the most hateful, degrading names. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickidewbear (talk • contribs) 04:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi Party

I know upon first seeing this pop up you're probably thinking that it is against your edit, but truthfully I think it is alright with keeping far-right in the box, so long as nazism's left wing positions are noted as well. - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very true, most of the left part of Nazism comes from its larger control from government, though in a way it sort of ties in with the social part since it allowed them to persecute minorities with that larger control, though their beliefs were extremely right wing in that social sense. They tied pretty well together (not in a good way at all, but conjoined well to fulfilling the nazis' goals). - BlagoCorzine2016 (talk) 21:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you!

Thank you for improving the fascism page. God bless! Sallese (talk) 22:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Halo 3 Marine.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Halo 3 Marine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JoseAntonio-DeRivera.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JoseAntonio-DeRivera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Rexism

User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Rexism, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Rexism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Rexism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.Brigade Piron (talk) 09:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Ustase

User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Ustase, a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Ustase and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Ustase during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:UNSC Trooper/New man (politics)

User:UNSC Trooper/New man (politics), a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UNSC Trooper/New man (politics) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UNSC Trooper/New man (politics) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Red Army (Bavaria), from its old location at User:UNSC Trooper/Red Army (Bavaria). This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:UNSC Trooper/List of fascist ideologies

User:UNSC Trooper/List of fascist ideologies, a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UNSC Trooper/List of fascist ideologies and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UNSC Trooper/List of fascist ideologies during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:UNSC Trooper/UNEF

User:UNSC Trooper/UNEF, a page which created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UNSC Trooper/UNEF and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UNSC Trooper/UNEF during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Red Army (Bavaria) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Red Army (Bavaria), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Anti-Nazi National Socialism

User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Anti-Nazi National Socialism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Anti-Nazi National Socialism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/Anti-Nazi National Socialism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Toa Nidhiki05 14:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/National Anarchism

User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/National Anarchism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/National Anarchism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UNSC Trooper/Userboxes/National Anarchism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — csc^-1 04:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]