User talk:Tropzax

Welcome!

Hello, Tropzax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Yash t 101 16:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia-ing

I know that you are not good at this. Everyone here was like you but they learned. To learn how wikipedia functions, please go through this again: Yash t 101 18:31, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Tropzax, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Yash t 101 18:31, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello! Tropzax, I noticed you've been having a hard time with articles you have helped write, as they are being nominated for deletion. If you'd like to drop by the Teahouse, a friendly place to ask questions about Wikipedia, and discuss your article! We'd love to see if we can help you out and make your Wikipedia experience as valuable as possible. See you there! Sarah (talk) 14:58, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:categories boxes

Hello, Tropzax. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Bill william compton^Talk 00:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your Teahouse question!

I have posted an answer to your question here: Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Alphabetising_category --Tito Dutta (Message) 01:14, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down!

Hi, Tropzax! I'm delighted to see you're enthusiastically embracing editing on Wikipedia, but you need to slow down and learn the basics before you start leaving posts like the ones on talk pages such as Talk:Downton Abbey. It's not appropriate for one editor to assume the role of arbiter of what is/is not correct. What you need to do is start by reading some of the basic articles you were referred to, and to learn about reliable sources. You have left a couple talk page posts about checking the IMDB for information about the credits in Downton Abbey, but seem unaware that the IMDB data is submitted by viewers, is riddled with erorrs, and that Wikipedia does not regard it as a source for cast or other credits. You're at a point right now where you need to talk less, and pay attention to how editing is done. Start by finding an article that needs improvement, the work on learning to edit it. Let other experienced editors help you, and you'll soon learn how things work. --Drmargi (talk) 21:54, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, cheers. Just one user had read the *arguments* and asked, because to her I am a reliable resource on Downton Abbey, for me to just review the individual discussions and give my own final judgement/ knowledge. With IMDb, I didn't want to have to refer to it but there aren't many sources for things which aren't press released and need clarification. In any case it was just to have all the final say's in one place, for others to edit if/when needs be. Delete it if you want, I've since realised it probably wasn't necessary and that most of the issues had been resolved. You seem to be an active and experienced, wise user so could you give me a headcheck whenever you see fit. --Tropzax (talk) 15:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I think I understand what you were doing now. Your motives were right; we just need to work on execution. There is no final decision or absolute standard for anything in an article, so your section compiling what you labeled as "final decisions" is inappropriate. But that's fixable. Please take a bit of time and read two files: WP:CONSENSUS and WP:RS. Nothing is ever the final word on anything on Wikipedia, both because our knowledge is fluid and because consensus as to what is correct/accurate/verifiable, etc. can change. I'll see if I can find the post asking you to weigh in and add a few thoughts, which should help. I'll also remove my comments from a couple talk pages in the meantime. The big thing is, right now, you may be reliable to your friends on Downton, but reliable here is very different. Step back and make sure you have a handle on how reliable sources and consensus work, and life will be easier. You can drop a message on my talk page any time you have a question; I'm happy to help you through the early days. We were all new editors once. --Drmargi (talk) 17:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie!

Drmargi has eaten your cookies! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating them. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:plate}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat the cookies with {{subst:munchplate}}!

RE: Allowed to put about a living person?

Hello, Tropzax. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by -- Trevj (talk) 11:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I keep forgetting but I do then go back into edit and add it. I'll write it on a post-it on my screen, eh? --Tropzax (talk) 17:32, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Tropzax. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by SarahStierch (talk) 00:19, 21 April 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. When you recently edited Juliet Cadzow, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Casualty and The Wicker Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Tropzax. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 15:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Sitting on Walls

In regard to Sitting on Walls, I have to admit that either due to the sound recording or the actress's accent, I can't understand half the dialogue (and there isn't that much of it). But I'm kind of curious to know what it is. Here's what it sounds like to me:

"It wasn't often sind around here, but when it was, it was beautiful. Sometimes, we'd go play at the (rack/rec/wreck?). ... Papa ... wouldn't be scared of such mosey and drew. Ah, ... ten o'clock ... foreign, pound. But there was one thing, whenever it was sunny, that we never compromised on, sittin' on walls."

This is not meant to make fun of anybody -- I really would like to know what she is saying. (Also, this film is supposed to be about life in the 1970s, but I can't tell how the 1970s come into it.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think she's saying "it wasn't often sunny around here, but when it was, it was beautiful. Sometimes we'd go play at the rec (short for recreational ground), take our bikes up to the estate to get (Milly? may be a nickname) and Drew. Or, take the 10' o clock 84 (a bus?) to/into town. But there was one thing, whenever it was sunny, that we never compromised on... Sitting on walls.

I assume because it's set in the North of England she's emphasised her own accent. The 1970's bit I think, from whay the description says, is that being a kid was simple and innocent as sitting on walls appears to be the thing they care about most.

Thanks. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's just what I think. Maybe ask on the video, I may not be right. --Tropzax (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:41, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Marcos Danilo Padilha

Sorry, the Brazilian news was reporting our datetime (1:15 a.m.) not the actual datetime in the place of the crash (10:15 p.m.). Thank you for fixing that. MYS 77 ^✉ 13:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Infamy of 2016

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Infamy of 2016. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2016. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2016 – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GILO A&E⇑ 13:48, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iridescent

Hi. Can I politely ask you to just stop trying to pick a fight with this user? Admins really don't delete articles for fun, on the contrary, they get a lot of grief and hassle over this. If you really want the text of the deleted article, I can pop it in your userspace as a sandbox. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:44, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, see she started it by deleting it without warning, and without any other user discussion. I'm sure that's not an accepted thing, so you can't defend it. That's what set the tone, and if she read anything I posted she'd notice that I was asking why it got deleted. It was nothing like a duplicate page, so that can't be it. If it's against Wikipedia policy and you can show that, that's OK, but she didn't. She ignored it all, like a sleazy politician pretending problems don't exist until they get hidden. Now she's having someone else talk to me? You seem good, and I try to be nice to good folk, so could you go ask her for me, in return? (Mate, I was not trying to pick a fight, I was using the tone she established within a conversation she prompted, becoming more angry at her when she ignored me) Tropzax (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the draft to User:Tropzax/Infamy of 2016. As you can see here, the article was tagged as a duplicate of an existing topic by Gilo1969; Iridescent merely agreed with the speedy nomination and deleted it, which he is allowed to do per the guidelines. "Note that once tagged with this notice, this user page may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria." Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Stag Hill, University of Surrey

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Tropzax, thanks for creating Stag Hill, University of Surrey!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains^(talk) 00:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Stag Hill, University of Surrey

Hello! Your submission of Stag Hill, University of Surrey at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:02, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stag Hill, University of Surrey

On 7 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stag Hill, University of Surrey, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a steel statue (pictured) at the entrance to the University of Surrey's Stag Hill Campus was strength-tested before being placed to ensure it could bear the weight of students attempting to climb it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stag Hill, University of Surrey. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Stag Hill, University of Surrey), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]