User talk:ToonIsALoon

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your recent edits to Royal Russell School have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 13:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Alan Shearer

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. I've removed the content you added to the Alan Shearer article for three reasons; firstly it was hidden inside a citation, secondly it was unreferenced and thirdly it was probably a bit too much information on something which was relatively minor. If you want to expand the section a little to include a sentence on NUFC's form in the season, I don't think anyone would have a problem with that, but due to the neutral point of view policy, we can't really say "sports media across the globe were criticising Souness relentlessly", probably something like: "Souness' team drew criticism in the press for both their form and playing style...", with a link to where this press criticism is.

If you want to add in a sentence and post the reference here or on my talk page, I'd be happy to do the technical stuff related to properly citing the information. You will need to find an article, preferable online to link to in order to verify the content.

If you want to do this, it would be better if a source more reliable than The Sun was referenced though e.g. a broadsheet i.e. The Times, The Independent, The Journal... etc.

Sorry for being so picky, but the article has been undergoing a revamp to try and get it to be one of the best in the encyclopaedia, so we need to make sure it conforms to guidelines etc. Thanks! - Toon⁰⁵ 16:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I apologise if I offended you, but there are guidelines as to how to write articles, which have been agreed by the whole community. The policies particularly important are: Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View and Wikipedia:Verifiability (which states that everything must be sourced properly - you can't just assert things without backup).
For general style guidelines, read Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
You can add what you want to articles, but editors will change basically all material at some point to make it fit the guidelines or phrase it differently, or a number of other reasons. We are trying to build an encyclopaedia, it's not just here for people to write about stuff. - Toon⁰⁵ 16:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Beckham

For your bit on the attempted stoppage of transfer, please find a source. Thanks, Calebrw (talk) 13:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the source. I found a slightly better one and added that instead. Calebrw (talk) 15:56, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Royal Russell School

I appreciate you're right to do so and respect it.

May i ask you're connection with the school?

Thanks, Toon —Preceding unsigned comment added by ToonIsALoon (talk • contribs)

Hi. I have no connection with the school. My interest is only in the encyclopaedia. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Thanks for experimenting with the page Alan Shearer on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. The official club site lists Shearer as the top scorer for Newcastle (http://www.nufc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Records/0,,10278~1241751,00.html). Wartime goals came in games which are viewed as friendlies. Add something to the page to explain this by all means, but don't change the facts. srushe (talk) 08:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

WWE edits

"That can be summed in half a paragraph, not 6/7+ paras"

This was the edit summary by another user when you added material to World Wrestling Entertainment. And yet you have persisted. Please stop. There is no need to add such detail to the WWE article. It is better placed on the articles of the wrestlers involved in that detail. It should be brief on the WWE page. Thank you. !! Justa Punk !! 21:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=World_Wrestling_Entertainment&diff=246320316&oldid=246298996

This is the edit summary when you were first informed that your edit was way too long. Also, you need sources for your edit. !! Justa Punk !! 00:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Bret Hart

The statement you added had no source. Darrenhusted (talk) 08:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Grammer

It's grammar. Not a big deal, but you did spell it incorrectly in an edit summary, which didn't fill me with confidence. - Dudesleeper / Talk 22:23, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyedit?

Thanks for you message. By copyedit, I mean that I'm just doing a general check tidy-up; not really adding or removing anything substantial - just adding/clarifying/expanding/correcting etc and trying to make articles follow the Manual of Style. So things like checking that the citations are correct, maybe adding a quote or to from the citation to support it and so on. I guess some people are good at adding content to Wikipedia, and others (like me) are better at reformatting! DrFrench (talk) 22:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Your edits

What you put in the article was violating POV, as you can't speak for everyone that he was despised. I deleted it. Simon^KSK 20:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Also you can not use wikipedia articles as refs, as the article which you are linking to might also not have reliable refs. Simon^KSK 20:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

I did not say it was vandalism. It did offer POV, because you were looking from the perspective of the booing people. Also read WP:SUMMARY. Simon^KSK 21:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

That's not true at all. Simon^KSK 21:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

It's not the sources at all. It's the way it is written. It doe not offer week by week and is kinda non notable. It also violates WP:BLP and WP:POV. Simon^KSK 22:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

RE:Montreal Screwjob

The reason I deleted these comments, I'm assuming you mean from the Vince McMahon article is because McMahon's article is TWICE the size of a desired article on Wikipedia and will continue to get longer as he continues to be active. Therefore, it makes no sense to add content to his article already found on the Montreal Screwjob page. There is a method of writing here on Wikipedia found at WP:SUMMARY. In a nutshell, when mentioning an incident, put a link to it and BRIEFLY describe it. The details can be found at the other page. Then, the McMahon page won't be so long. Nikki♥311 21:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Not only are your additions POV, they are entirely unsourced (except for a link to Amazon, and I'm not sure what you are trying to with that). If you continue to add POV and information that violates the biography of living person's policy, I will block you for disruptive editing and violation of BLP. Please discuss what you want to add on the article's talk page, so the editors involved can come to a consensus. Thanks. Nikki♥311 19:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Actually, you are incorrect, as I am not a fan of McMahon...and I have no problem with information that isn't positive being included in his article. Please discuss your feelings on the talk page of that article so more people will give opinions. Nikki♥311 23:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Hogans return to WCW, Austins had probs

If it happened, you have to source it when you add it. Also, please don’t simply revert me without seeing the revisions. You’ll see that over time, minor edits were made, including but not limited to removing his image. As you can see, after you reverted me he no longer has a main image. Could you please revert your edit, and then add back your sentence about his problems with Hogan. THanks Ive Cena Nuff (talk) 19:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

World War II

Hello, ToonIsALoon. I noticed your arbitration request regarding World War II, and I think the place you're looking for is WP:FAC - that's where articles are nominated for Featured status. Keep in mind, though, that Featured articles must meet some strict criteria, and Featured status is determined by the quality of the article, not the importance of the subject. There's more information on that page I linked. As for the protection, if you feel the article should be unprotected, you should make a request at WP:RFPP under "Requests for unprotection". In the meantime, I've removed your arbitration request as it's not the sort of thing ArbCom does; they're intended to serve as a final means of dispute resolution, not dealing with content matters. If you have any questions, let me know. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Quite welcome. If you need any help, feel free to ask. :-) Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Newcastle

Hi, I saw your addition to Newcastle united, looks ok but is totally uncited, adding uncited content is not a good idea, it is more correct to not add any content without having a citation to support it, feel free to replace it with a citation, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 15:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi, any particular lines in mind?

ToonIsALoon (talk) 16:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I reverted them all, was any of it supported by a citation? I was going to leave it as it was not very controversial and there is other stuff uncited across the wiki..but it is correct to add a citation with new content. Off2riorob (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I understand your concerns and you are well within your rights to do so, however as the topics expanded upon are pretty much dated, to find what wikipedia would call 'reliable' links, such as the BBC, The Telegraph, Sky Sports, etc etc, it is difficult. If you are able to search and see links that are reliably sourced to the content then by all means contact or undo the content in place and request the user to provide links. Otherwise i would leave users to provide inaccuracies or failing to strive for neutral point of view before undoing the content. I will do my best to find reliable links. Thanks for your help.

ToonIsALoon (talk) 10:58, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ToPlayTheKing.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ToPlayTheKing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

File:MOT Spec.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:MOT Spec.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:23, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

To Play the King

Regarding your recent revert at To Play the King: please see this section of the verifiability policy. Asserting your own guesswork is not enough; the claim needs a reliable source to back it up. Thanks. --Ibn (talk) 13:17, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ToPlayTheKing1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ToPlayTheKing1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Scott Hall

Just to let you know, I did not edit Hall's page to say he wrestled for "WWE". That info was already there; would have changed it myself but wasn't paying attention. What I did do was delete the weird 'one of few WWF wrestlers that didn't wrestle there when it became WWE' line. There's a ton of those wrestlers. InFlamester20 (talk) 01:35, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, no worries over WWE, wasnt a direct attack on you, just it is clear that he never wrestled under WWE. On the 'never wrestled under wwe branding,' the only wrestlers that are considered a 'bulk' are the ones from the early 90's and pretty much all the 1980's bar Hogan. However, as I've seen someone as declared him as an inactive performer, I'll leave this be.

ToonIsALoon (talk) 10:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

The Godfather Part III

Hi there. I notice you are in a dispute with another editor regarding a sequel to the above movie, and that you have been edit-warring to have this information included. I just took a look at the discussion on the talk page of this article, and at the discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#The concept of The Godfather Part IV and can I ask you to weigh in there rather than just reverting to your particular version? Saying, "I'm going to keep undoing this and re-adding as you don't really have an argument" is just an invitation to edit-war and what's going to happen is that the article will end up getting fully-protected from editing; something that nobody wants to see. So can you keep the discussion going on the talk page or preferably over on WP:Film where there are more folks. Maybe try to find some common ground? - Alison ^❤ 03:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for this. I have continued the discussion on the suggested page and will refrain form reposting it anywhere until common ground is found.

ToonIsALoon (talk) 14:38, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. When you recently edited Rocky V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brain Damage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Final Cut.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Final Cut.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Newcastle United F.C., you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Ashley and Ignacio González (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:51, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Newcastle United F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, have repaired it.

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timeline of the 2011 England riots may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:08, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ron Woodroof may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• AIDs-victim-Ron-Woodroof-tragic-life-played-Matthew-McConaughey-movie-The-Dallas-Club.html|work=[[Daily Mail|accessdate=August 18, 2014|date=December 6, 2012}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muhammad Ali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Jeffries. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ToonIsALoon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Super Fight images

Hello. I noticed you added two images to Wikipedia Commons for the The Super Fight article--images of a ticket and a publicity poster. Hopefully, they'll be able to stay. However, both will be deleted in a week if they are not correctly licensed. I added a Public Domain license to the ticket image, but I won't guarantee that it will be accepted. The publicity poster most likely cannot stay on Commons, but will have to be re-uploaded to the English Wikipedia. That's because posters are almost always "non-free" content, and Commons does not allow non-free content. The English Wikipedia site does allow non-free content, but you will need to include this license: {{Non-free poster}}. If the ticket image gets kicked off Commons because the public domain license is not accepted by the admins, that image could also be re-uploaded to en:WP with either the same public domain license or maybe a non-free license. Wanted to give you a heads-up, because I'm certain they'll both be deleted in a week, if action is not taken to show they're correctly licensed. DonFB (talk) 16:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with History of Newcastle United F.C.. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ToonIsALoon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Transfermarkt again

I've explained this to you once already: Since much of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with Newcastle United F.C. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nintendo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ToonIsALoon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of rent control in England and Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Housing Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue (English group), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, this has been resolved.

ToonIsALoon (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue (English group), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andy Cole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sir John Hall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dragons' Den (British TV programme), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Advertising Standards Authority.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello I added warning to Deanock12 for removing content he will be blocked if he does it again. Can you please add warnings for that user? 80.2.22.48 (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you I have warned him as well. ToonIsALoon (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

He's still doing it so can you block him for it? 85.255.237.3 (talk) 15:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

I added a message for which Deanock12 because he'll be now blocked. 85.255.237.3 (talk) 16:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Deanock12 is still doing it so can you add warnings? 85.255.237.3 (talk) 17:23, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Lets wait and see if your request is accepted. He's been warned. ToonIsALoon (talk) 13:45, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Dragons' Den (British TV programme) offers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate Bell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)