User talk:Tingrin87
Proposed merger of Carolinas Medical Center articles
[edit]As the author of the articles on CMC, I would advise going against the merger proposal because each hospital with the exceptions of CMC-Main, CMC-Mercy, CMC-Pineville, and CMC-University were once independent of one another before becoming a part of Carolinas Healthcare System. When you attempt to merge the articles, all you will be left with is one long article that will need to be subdivided into the appropriate pages. Even if you believe that merging the pages is the correct course of action, I will do whatever it takes to make sure each hospital is reincorporated into the new page. Brandon 23:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geomapboy2 (talk • contribs)
- I would definitely keep all the current information, I just think that (as they currently stand) there is a significant amount of overlapping information, and could be better displayed in a timeline-like format, a kind of "History of CMC" (to me, that is almost what is online now)
- I would display it in several sections, like so:
- Carolinas Medical Center - Mercy 185-bed adult health tertiary acute care care facility located in the Elizabeth neighborhood of Charlotte, North Carolina. The hospital was founded in 1906 as Mercy Hospital by the Sisters of Mercy, and purchased by Carolinas Healthcare System in 1995. CMC-Mercy is the first Catholic hospital ever built in North Carolina. Today, CMC-Mercy is a leader in providing the adult population of Charlotte with quality health care. The hospital is also home to several of Carolinas Healthcare system's specialty departments, including Pulmonary and Pain Management facilities. It is a facility of Carolinas Healthcare System, one of the nation's largest publicly owned, not-for-profit hospital operators.
- (so on and so forth, standardizing the order of information in the sections, ordering them probably by the date they joined CMC hospitals. Comments appreciated) -TinGrin 03:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- I strongly approve of what you are proposing. Can we still keep the individual articles for a more detailed description of each hospital?Brandon 03:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geomapboy2 (talk • contribs)
- I'll look into it, depends on how much more relevant information i can dig up. based on some of the other NC hospital systems wikipages (Duke University Health System, WakeMed) it doesn't look like there is much relevant information beyond what is already in the 5 stubs, but they can always be expanded into full articles in the future. -TinGrin 04:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- I strongly approve of what you are proposing. Can we still keep the individual articles for a more detailed description of each hospital?Brandon 03:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geomapboy2 (talk • contribs)
Select Survey Invite
[edit]I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.
Your survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_exjgWsqGIxD269v&Q_CHL=gl
I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.
Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 01:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tingrin87. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Orphaned non-free image File:Cheese DickAtNite.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cheese DickAtNite.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)