User talk:TimHowardHad15Saves
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, TimHowardHad15Saves, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 16:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
TimHowardHad15Saves, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi TimHowardHad15Saves! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:17, 25 December 2014 (UTC) |
Help
[edit]This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I'm new here, but I am right. Lots of veteran editors are making invalid edits and threatening me for edit warring, when they are the ones participating in the war. How is this some democracy around here?
- Wikipedia is not a democracy, and being right is not an excuse for edit warring. You should discuss the issue on the talkk page and reach a consensus based on what the most reliable sources report. Huon (talk) 01:01, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Why do others get to edit pages to their satisfaction if they are wrong? It's a joke man.
- Gee. For the moment you are in a tiny edit war with two people, from which I don't consider myself as a veteran. It is possible that Howard made 15 saves after revision, but I still feel the lack of a reliable source showing that FIFA revised the number of saves (instead of a mistake at the statistics website from the beginning on). For the moment, I consider it like this: the matchday itself mistakably only 15 saves were recorded, but the day after FIFA clearly communicated about 16 saves. There is some evidence that there actually have been 16 like in this communiqué - check YouTube. Kareldorado (talk) 11:43, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Your perseverance is something good, and it is perfectly possible that you are right and we are wrong (I don't feel very offended if so), but sometimes a good discussion with valid arguments is needed to come closest the truth. For me that is democracy at its best. Kareldorado (talk) 11:43, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
There is no discussion. There's no opinion. The official stat says 15.
- How can you dont understand different sourcs say different numbers, there are even FIFA sources saying different things. QED237 (talk) 14:29, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- I understand that the official document shows 15, that it was revised, and that people say it was revised. And your argument is....?
- Who said it was revised? If there were a news story (in a secondary source, not a status update posted in the USSF Facebook page) that outright said "FIFA revised the save count from 16 to 15," this would be an open-and-shut case. —C.Fred (talk) 15:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- The document itself shows it was revised. Further, US Soccer says the total was revised. Holy shit, it is open and shut. Again I say, what is your argument for 16? And stop discussing here. Use Talk:Tim Howard so everyone can see your reasons that hold no weight.
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]Hello there, I am TeaLover1996 I hope you are enjoying your time here at Wikipedia, your contributions are greatly appreciated and are crucial in building the encyclopedia, if you need help with anything or would like to ask me a question, then please do so!, I can't promise that I will respond quickly, but I will when I can and I will try and help in any way I can. Happy Editing!!!! TeaLover1996 (talk) 11:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)