User talk:Theroadislong/Archive 7

My addition to Lucifer was accurate and included a citation why is it deleted automatically

Here is my edit below. I know this to be fact, what is the problem with adding truth to wikipedia. If issues like this can't be resolved I will not use this website and will not recommend anyone else does.

The true meaning of the name Lucifer has been lost throughout the many ages of translations and interpretations of the Bible. In the Beginning God created the firstborn son Jesus who was named Lucifer before being born as Yehoshua(Jesus). The name Lucifer has the meaning "light bringer" where as his twin brother the Devil is the opposite of light. When the Devil decided to lead the angels down to earth and disobey God he started becoming "the Devil", where as his brother Lucifer was doing the opposite by obeying God and doing everything he was told. That is why he is called someone who "was daily his delight"(KJV, Holy Bible, Proverbs 8:30) or "a master worker"(The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures).Cite error: " I personally believe that information from this Gay City News article should be included in the article in order to elaborate on Keller's precise stance, but others disagree. I think that there is a possibility that the key to reaching consensus may be either in what way the article is cited or in which quote from the article is selected.CurtisNaito (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Not sure I'd be up to the job! I'll take a look later.Theroadislong (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

ID reconsider

178.116.208.77 (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC) Please reconsider inserting my reference to Meyer's major and readible book from 2009 that I found very convincing.Wikipedia has to be non-biased and open for all the well documented arguments on the matter of ID. I consider myself a rationalist and certainly no bigot.Most references on the lemma are rather old so I thought this work should be mentionned 178.116.208.77 (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

   You added a commercial link to buy the book. If there is a website that discusses the content of the book that might be more appropriate? You can always make suggestions on the article talk page.Theroadislong (talk) 15:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

178.116.208.77 (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)There is of course the wikipedia link 'signature in the cell' that should be inserted in the article on ID.178.116.208.77 (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

   The book is listed here List of works on intelligent design with hundreds of other books, I can't see any reason for linking it in the Intelligent design article, unless you wish to cite it it some way?Theroadislong (talk) 15:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank You!

I really appreciate your contribution. Love and peace!-- Lubna Rizvi 11:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC) My edit to Jesus

Howdy, I made an edit to the Jesus article and I felt I left a good explanation as to why the move was needed, and you reverted that edit with no explanation and marked it as a minor edit. Would you mind giving me an explanation for the revert so I have some food for thought? Akuvar (talk) 19:02, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

   I reverted it because the comment there says "The paragraph below was created by consensus after considerable discussion by a variety of editors. Out of courtesy for this process, please discuss any proposed changes on the talk page before editing it" and you didn't discuss it on the talk page as far as I'm aware? Kind regardsTheroadislong (talk) 19:33, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

       But editors on wikipedia are not required to follow those requests, correct? And I do not believe that failure to adhere to someone's request is a valid reason to perform a wholesale reversion of a good-faith edit, is it? Just as out of courtesy you should have written an edit summary when you performed the revision. Lastly, the reversion of my edits should not have been marked minor. I do thank you for responding to my inquiry. Akuvar (talk) 22:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar. Yworo (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Karen McCrimmon

I am trying tp improve the article on Karen McCrimmon by correcting grammar and so on. I have removed redundancies, but have included no new material.

I am also trying to make the piece less hagiographic.

Why do I need citations and references for doing this? And what on earth would they be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyKeene (talk • contribs) 23:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Portchester > Harewood

Thanks for reviewing this so quickly! I understand your need to remove the unreferenced and possibly biased information about the Sports hall being ne of the best in the country. I think it may be auctally but it doesn't matter. Many thanks, this will probably get me into the 6th form! > Harewood College. Once again... Thank you! FranktheTank (talk) 22:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC) A cheeseburger for you! Cheeseburger.png Thanks for your 'up and at 'em' style on that Priory School article. I should be as bold as you! Cheers bro. Basket Feudalist 20:52, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Soldner wiki site

I am very frustrated that I cannot talk with you! I made changes to Paul Soldner's wiki page because it needed more and better information, not less. At this time it is an uninformative site. I thought the wiki sites were supposed to be educational. Tell me what I need to do to make what I submitted acceptable. I would assume you would prefer people who know something about their subject to be the ones offering information. This makes me suspect that other sites are also not as helpful as they could be. Please contact me so that I can make Paul Soldner's wiki site much better that it is currently.

I don't understand how I am supposed to sign this talk page.Stephanie soldner sullivan (talk) 00:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC) Stephanie (like this?)

   User:Crusoe8181 reverted your edits because of your clear conflict of interest and because they provided no reliable third party references. When you are closely connected to an article subject it's best to suggest improvements on the article talk page but you will need to provide references for any material. I will take a look later and see what I can add for you. All good wishes.Theroadislong (talk) 09:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Optical Express Talk

Hi, I have posted a few comments requesting a review by independent editors. I would appreciate if you could take a look when you get a second, please. Thanks. Hardlygone (talk) 09:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Soldner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raku (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC) David Gommon Page

thank you for your comment on the David Gommon page... i am helping the artist son Peter create the page and increase interest in the page/artist... i've added reference and a bibliography to the page as well as links to galleries where his work is on show... any advice or further help you could offer in terms of making the page more suitable for wikipedia would be appreciated?... Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gommoart (talk • contribs) 13:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

   It desperately needs reliable third party references, at the moment it is sadly lacking and just looks like original research.Theroadislong (talk) 14:00, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Comment by Stopnow001

Hi. I reverted Stopnow001's removal of content from your page just now, but didn't mean to also remove their comment at "High school" (way up above, where you probably wouldn't have noticed it). It was "Please see my latest Edit for a REF." Bishonen | talk 21:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC).

   Thanks for thatTheroadislong (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback Nuvola apps edu languages.svg Hello, Theroadislong. You have new messages at Starship9000's talk page. Message added 21:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the or template.

Starship9000 (talk) 21:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC) re User:Scott Bury

I'm considering escalating this to WP:AN/I. I don't think these FCAC people are going to listen to us. Mangoe (talk) 21:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC) Priory School, Isle of Wight

As one of the editors who reverted the edits on Priory School, Isle of Wight last month, I would appreciate your views on my latest changes. I have tried to go back to before the large number of edits that introduced all the unencyclopaedic content, so I have tried to improve the tone, add back some of the content that got lost and improve the references. It will need more work, but I hope it is back in a sensible state. If you have any comments, do let me know. Thanks. Adamiow (talk) 23:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Nevzorov Haute Ecole

Please can you check up once again, whether the article has improved it`s quality?--Angelika NHE1 (talk) 22:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC) CITING

Hi, I'm sorry, I didnt know hoe to cite that post, I have the source but I don't know how to add it. need Some Help. Reply on my talk ASAP. Thank you. //Only Love Can Heal Such A Scar// (talk) 18:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

   Even if you have the source I don't think your sentence belongs in an encyclopaedia..."Bono's favourite food is caviar and fish n' fries. His favourite colour is Ambar. He enjoys, Patti Smith, Bob dylan, The Verve and Radiohead's music." SorryTheroadislong (talk) 19:01, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

SORRY

Oops!!! I'm really really sorry. Can I ask you a question?... what are the things I should or I should not add to the wikipedia articles. //Only Love Can Heal Such A Scar// (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC) I Left A message For You At Bono's Talk Page

Please read it. It hurted my feelings

the way you talked about me yesterday. i just wanted to help. i'm new in this stuff. //Only Love Can Heal Such A Scar// (talk) 20:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

   I warned you about adding incorrectly referenced material... not sure why this would hurt your feelings?Theroadislong (talk) 20:45, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

It's not about what you said-i completely understand that and I support that- it's the way you said it. In my opinion-i'm not sure if yours is the same that mine- you should've told me that instead of posting something in a public wall such as Bono's.

Sorry, I'm very sensitive-if that's the right word- and I felt shame. and sorry again if that's sounds you stupid. Kind regards for u 2//Only Love Can Heal Such A Scar// (talk) 21:20, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

   All pages on Wikipedia are public and you have nothing to be ashamed of; if you are that sensitive maybe Wikipedia is not for you?Theroadislong (talk) 21:25, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

       I just want to learn, to improve my skills on this web site. Can you help me on that? I'll try not to be that sensitive. //Only Love Can Heal Such A Scar// (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

           I just posted some helpful links on your talk page. All good wishes.Theroadislong (talk) 13:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

     Thank you vey much for your help... it's very kind of you. God Bless you!! and you just tell me if I'm making you sick...i won't bother you anymore

if you want to... rewards //Only Love Can Heal Such A Scar// (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

BONO'S Talk

I left a post on Bono's talk, i don't know if it helps much //Only Love Can Heal Such A Scar// (talk) 20:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC) Please, check it Steve Roach (musician)

Thanks for tagging the article with COI, etc. I just sent an email out to the photographer and Projekt Records regarding the actual image and its current use. If it's still copyrighted, then it'll be deleted. (There's no proof on the image page that the copyright holder released it for free use.) – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 19:42, 5 March 2013 (UTC) MY Username

I don't know how it happens. I made a request to change my username and it seems they didn't change it. What else can i do??. Sometimes it appear as Ali hewson and sometimes it does as MissBono. i need help from the administration of wikipedia. Can you do something for me??? MissBono (talk) 21:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

   I am not an admin, so I can't really help. Are you signing your posts with four tildes? and why does your username code now say "Ali Hewson|MissBono" Theroadislong (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

           Aparently the problem is over.U2_Girl! (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Adding Some Information to An Article

I post something on Bono's talk but no one answer.U2_Girl! (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

   I was talking about the another 2 posts o' mine, too. Sorry the bother. And thank you for replying. kind regards U2_Girl! (talk) 14:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

           Did you find some source about bono's blindness??U2_Girl! (talk) 14:22, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

               His eyes are sensitive to light, it's already mentioned in the article.Theroadislong (talk) 15:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

                   Yeah, I already read it, but recently Julian Lennon said something. His condition is getting worst. it's a problem that medically talking gets worst as time goes by. But Bono didn't told that to Rolling Stones Magazine on that interview, until now. At least that's what I read MissBono (talk) 16:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg Hello, Theroadislong. You have new messages at Miss Bono's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the or template. ACCIDENT

Talking about the Ali Hewson's article, in which section should I post that she recently has an accident with a squad. or this is not important?MissBono (talk) 19:48, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

   I suggest you ask at the Ali Hewson talk page.Theroadislong (talk) 20:08, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

HAVING SOME LOGGING PROBLEMS

I can't acces to my User page from my own PC. What's going on??? Nedd some help.U2_Girl! (talk) 15:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC) U2_Girl! (talk) 16:00, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

   You could try the Wikipedia:Help desk Theroadislong (talk) 16:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

       Thank you. right now I'm feeling ashamed for bothering you too much. Am I anoying you taht much?? :( U2_Girl! (talk) 16:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

           I just thought you might get a better answer there, I have no idea what your game is you appear to log in as someone different every time!Theroadislong (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

               I don't have any game. I've text "Wasted Time R" for help and he contact with an admin and I thought the problem was solved. I think i'm not appearing as Ali Hewson anymore.Don't think that way about me. I'm starting now in Wikipedia and I have some probby troubles. i just thought that you might help me when I get stucked. Is that a problem?? Please, reply as soon as you canU2_Girl! (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Objective Prose

The post made under the Richmond, Virginia page was factual and objective. How should I phrase the addition in order for it to be acceptable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Studiotwothree (talk • contribs) 16:51, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

   You have a clear conflict of interest, you should not be adding any details of your own organisation. It's not what Wikipedia is for.Theroadislong (talk) 16:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Question!

Sorry that i am posting on your talk, i know you dont like me to do it but i have a quest for you. you said that IMDB is not a reliable source for adding as a reference to an article but on Bono's there is some reference from IMDB wich points that he is a fan of the Celtic FC. Why you didn't erase that as you did with my post??? Miss Bono (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

   Feel free to delete that too, IMDB is not a reliable source.Theroadislong (talk) 23:52, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Gen. Flood

"Flood myth" implies obviously that the story is false. Is that a necessary position for the article to take de facto?74.128.122.84 (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

   Myth means "sacred story," not "false story" Theroadislong (talk) 20:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

The "Flood myth" page on Wiki clearly calls it a symbolic story. If theres no implication in the term "myth" i don't understand why you edited "narrative."74.128.122.84 (talk) 20:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

   I suggest you take your concerns to the talk page of the article, it has been discussed many, many, many times before there.Theroadislong (talk) 20:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

The International Fact-Finding Mission on Israeli Settlements

Hi there, I noticed that you added a COI tag to the page for The International Fact-Finding Mission on Israeli Settlements. I appreciate your edit, I was just wondering what about the article implied a connection, because I would be happy to fix it. Thanks!Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 18:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

   It was the edits of User:FFMSettlements but you appear to have boldly fixed the problems, thanks.Theroadislong (talk) 19:10, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Message on Eve Hewson's talk

I left one for you. please, reply.Miss Bono (talk) 15:48, 25 March 2013 (UTC) Deleted Information

Sorry, I didn't notice the changes I did to Ali's artilce, but i didn't erase it at all, I just replaced (4) by her children's names. I thought it was helpful. Miss Bono (talk) 15:54, 25 March 2013 (UTC) Messages on talk pages

I left some messages on Bono and Edge's talk pages...Miss Bono (talk) 13:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

       And thanks for you're answer at the teahouse lol:)Miss Bono (talk) 13:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

I left some message on Edge's talk page..Miss Bono (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

           These pages are on my watchlist you don't have to tell me here too ;) 15:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
           Oops!, I'm sorry, it was my bad. Sorry, again... Miss Bono (talk) 15:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Change of picture!

I hope not being annoying, but I found a picture for Bono's infobox and it looks better than the others. What do you say?? http://en.wiki.x.io/Bono Miss Bono (talk) 15:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

   Nothing there... and the existing photo is fine as was the Edge photo.Theroadislong (talk) 15:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

           take a look again at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Bono, and then re-replace it if you want to Miss Bono (talk) 15:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Is this a reliable source to add information???

http://thinklings.org Miss Bono (talk) 17:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

   I'm no expert but it looks totally unreliable to me!Theroadislong (talk) 17:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

           Thank you fr your time. Miss Bono (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Lymphoma

Hi Theroadislong - the link we added isn't inappropriate. Wikiepedia's external links policy states that it's appropriate to link to 'Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,[3] amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons. If you visit our website you will find a wealth of patient-friendly information about almost any aspect of lymphoma on there for patients, which we provide free of charge. Everything is reviewed by patients and doctors and regularly updated. We used to get about 5% of our traffic through Wikipedia, until someone removed the link, which was a huge disservice to people living with a lymphatic cancer diagnosis. Please put the link back in! We're a UK non-profit with an extremely prestigious medical advisory panel (see the About Us section on our website, lymphomas.org.uk, for more information)

   OK... I've added it back, though I'm fairly confident I was right to remove it. I'll let others decide.Theroadislong (talk) 21:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

PINK de Thierry

To the road is long, Thank you for revising my English in the correction i did to-day in the article PINK de Thierry. Donald.louw 10:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donald.louw (talk • contribs) Optical Express edits (Again)

Hi, I just wanted to highlight some recent additions to Optical Express which I don't believe are necessary but obviously I have agreed not to edit directly so I'm requesting that you revert back to previous version. The additions were made by an IP address which we have had issues before. I don't believe the additions are relevant or necessary and would request reversion back to previous version. Thanks --Hardlygone (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC) Haynes House

Thanks for the addition, but I'm concerned about using this source — ever since I found it, I've thought it to be somewhat of an opinion page, not a reliable source. That's the only reason I didn't add it a good while ago, and also the only reason I've not added this followup story, which notes that his property taxes would be substantially lower if he lived there — this makes me suspect that he's essentially trying to cheat the tax people by pretending to live there. Nyttend (talk) 19:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

   The references seem solid enough to me but I'm happy to be guided by your superior knowledge of the details.Theroadislong (talk) 20:32, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

George Komsky

You don't realize that George has been a protege of Seth's since 2005, just because no one from the LA times came to a voice lesson does not mean it isn't true. If you look at Mr. Webb's claims they are sourced to his personal website, does that not seem like a COI of interest to you?

Could you please remove the COI that you put on George's article? Yes I started his page, but now that his fans know about it they will be contributing as well. He is a good kid and everything i've contributed to the article is true.

Please understand that I meant no harm in anything. Also, did you write the hurtful comments on the talk page of the article? Or was that just someone that brought the page to your attention?

Ngoesseringer (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

   Wikipedia requires reliable references, if you can find any, feel free to reintroduce the content. As for Phillip Webb it is referenced here [1] also. I did not write the comments on the talk page, I wouldn't be so childish. When you have a clear conflict of interest it is best to suggest improvements on the article talk page rather than directly editing yourself. All good wishes.Theroadislong (talk) 21:22, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

George Komsky

Thanks for being so kind and prompt with your reply. Could you please remove the COI from the top of the page? I started the article, did my best with all online sources, and now I am finished with it. From here on out its George's fans who will be contributing. I really just want to avoid the COI tag, I have not mentioned ANYTHING untrue or unverifiable, I just wanted to cite his actual accomplishments sans hyperbole or exaggeration.

Please help?

Ngoesseringer (talk) 21:33, 30 March 2013 (UTC) Fixed the Seth Riggs reference George Komsky

Hi, I did just like you advised and I added the necessary citation. Thank you for being so kind and helpful.Ngoesseringer (talk) 22:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

   That's great thanks.Theroadislong (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

User:John shaftman

Well, exactly. I think we have some problems with this editor, but if you think I was wrong to delete the article, let me know and I'll restore so the Afd can continue. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

   It has been VERY difficult to help him, he doesn't seem willing to read anything or learn how things operate, the references I added for him, were removed by him and I was accused of harassment, maybe it would be better to let the afd take it's course? I'll leave it to your judgement.Theroadislong (talk) 18:58, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

George Komsky

All the remaining articles meet your criteria, there are 3rd party and completely legit. Could you please remove the warning labels at the top?

Ngoesseringer (talk) 09:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

   The article needs more reliable third party references User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom added the template with good reason, I suggest you discuss it with him.Theroadislong (talk) 10:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Everything online that us reliable is on the page, I can't invent anything out of thin air. They are all reliable third party sources, please check again, the above editor is also rude and spiteful - take a look at his comments Ngoesseringer (talk) 10:31, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

   It is up for afd because of notability concerns, the tags for reliable references are there to help the article get more of them! Theroadislong (talk) 10:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Eve Hewson's Talk

Check it please and give me a response if it's possible. Miss Bono (talk) 19:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Eve Hewson's Talk

Check it please and give me a response if it's possible.Miss Bono (talk) 14:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC) George Komsky

Hi there. I just wanted to ask her help.... Firstly let me apologize for any edit mistakes I made. I'm new at this and I wasn't aware of the process. Could you offer any advice on the afd process? Is there anything else that I should avoid now? I have removed myself from the edits completely and I wanted to get your opinion on how the article stands now? Also, have you noticed how belligerent the editors have been? Is this normal and acceptable behavior? Please take a look at their comments: 'sources are crap' 'person is a nobody' 'charities are biased and lying'... Etc. it's really offensive and I thought wikipedia was supposed to be above that.Ngoesseringer (talk) 09:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

   As far as I can tell User:TheRedPenOfDoom wasn't calling George a nobody he was saying he was a somebody? he said "they have an inherent conflict of interest in having a SOMEONE rather than a NOBODY perform for their cause" I think the main problem is that Wikipedia is VERY, VERY against PR people working on articles, as you have found. Wikipedia strives to be neutral and if PR people are allowed to create articles all over the place, that neutrality is threatened. Attacking other editors as you have done here [2] is only going to lead to a block. Please comment on content and not other editors. Your cause is not helped by the slew of single purpose accounts editing at the afd this always rings alarm bells. I'll take another look at the article, but don't worry if it's deleted this time, if someone is notable then an article will eventually be created by someone neutral and unconnected.Theroadislong (talk) 10:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

You are mistaken, he is directly implying that George is a nobody and that they would want invent in a PR release that he is a somebody. Ngoesseringer (talk) 05:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC) AFD Komsky

Hi, I am one of those single issue editors you described. I like the subject, noticed his posting on Facebook and decided to contribute, but I've done so without any wrongdoing. After reading the deletion page, I noticed that redpenofdoom removed a citation about the amount of people that watched his anthem for he patriots, saying they weren't watching him. But it wasn't the claim of the article. Then a later editor faulted the subjects notability because according to him no one watched the game on live TV. However, if he had seen the page before redpenofdoom subjectively removed the proof that it was seen by an enormous audience, he wouldn't have made his comment and may not have voted delete. Could you please make sure that redpenofdoom does not again sway the conversation with questionable edits?

Selmaflora294 (talk) 22:51, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Please check out either of these videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lOUubkE8Sk and this: https://vimeo.com/56063290

I know they re not source worthy on the page, but its CONCLUSIVE visual confirmation that the performance was broadcast live, its NBC's live broadcast for crying out loud! Please take a look at orangemike and the others claiming that I am liar, that we are inventing things. Its hurtful and not true!!!!!!!! This whole process is is just so ugly, why?

Ngoesseringer (talk) 05:16, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

   PLEASE assume good faith. I don't have any doubt that he performed there, live or otherwise, though I'm not sure why this makes him notable? I voted Keep at the afd. Please leave me out of this bad tempered situation, I'm here to improve Wikipedia not promote your client.Theroadislong (talk) 08:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject U2 invitation

Frankfurt U2.svg Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!

You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here! [show]Project U2 member list

–pjoef (talk • contribs) 11:52, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Question

Hi! I voted on the George Komsky afd and I read a lot of the discussion. It seems to me that there is a large grey area with respect to notability, and I cited direct references from WP guidelines to make that point. Could you please let me know if you think the subjectivity in the afd has clouded some of the editorial judgment on both sides? Per example, the detracting editors have decided that they can judge content in addition to judging wikipedia rules, of which I'm certain they are experts in, but that does not make them experts in judging sources or in claiming that something is unimportant, when in fact they could be wrong about that. Isn't it dangerous for them to write with authority on something that is no more then an opinion? You know a whole hell of a lot more then I do about these things. I'm curious as to what your opinion is and what happens now? Also where do I go to find out about what new articles need editing? Mikeclark22 (talk) 22:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

   I shouldn't worry too much about it all, life's too short. An admin will decide on the merits of all the comments. If Kompsky truly is notable then more reliable references will become available and the article can be recreated in the future, it's no big deal. Hopefully it will NOT be recreated by his PR company (this ALWAYS leads to disaster on Wikipedia).

As for new articles that need editing, just follow your interests. Have fun.Theroadislong (talk) 09:29, 10 April 2013 (UTC) Merge discussion for Décolletage

Information.svg An article that you have been involved in editing, Décolletage , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — btphelps (talk) (contribs) 15:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC) Plcoopr

My intentions was to change the idea from myth to theory. I thought that would be a more appropriate fit for the article. I felt I was acting accordingly to the second piller of wikipedia (Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.) I left the article to research on how to change the title of a wiki article. My plans were to come back and finish editing the article. I had plans to add a few new section of the "opposing view" to the article. I felt this article scoffed at and was very dismissive of the idea that the flood has tangible evidence(in recent years). To say something is a myth is completely disregarding the large portion of the population that believes and have "imperial evidence" to prove their point. I do respect the policies of Wikipedia and intend to abide by them wholeheartedly. I did not mean to garner and unnecessarily attention form the powers that be. I apologize for you having to take time to tend to this situation. I can assure you the edits were coming from a good place. For future reference, If I did want to make drastic changes to an article, what would be the correct protocol to follow Plcoopr (talk) 23:43, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

   Use the talk page and ask for a name change in this case. You'll have to argue that our policy at Wikipedia:Article titles#Common names supports the change you want and you'll need to get consensus. Dougweller (talk) 06:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

WP: U2

Why don't you join WP U2 members' list??. It would be great. Miss Bono (zootalk) 14:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC) Bono On Bono

please, take a look at it and tell me if you can contribute 3

       I'll open a talk page at 4... so We can discuss about that.

By the way, I am sorry for the senseless first paragraph, I was at 3 things at the same time and it was impossible to focus on that.

And the discussion is here

Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

       Can You find sources on this matter for me? Please  Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

           I can't see anything apart from blogs and Amazon which is not suitable. I guess that although Bono is notable the author Michka Assayas is not .Theroadislong (talk) 18:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

What do you suggest?? Miss Bono (zootalk) 18:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC) American Academy of Financial Management - COI and NPOV problems for 3 years.

neutral point of view

Whoever is editing the American Academy of Financial Management article is adding defamatory content in there. The exiting editors may have some COI problems with the article. conflict of interest I am familiar with CFA, CFP and AAFM and none of them offer diplomas or degrees, but some editor is stating that AAFM offers degrees which is wrong. The AAFM article also contains criticism that has been exposed to be fraudulent by WIKIs very own references and editors. As a financial planner, I am knowledgeable in the area, and this article is horrible. The article should mirror other articles in the industry such as CFA Institute and Certified Financial Planner. My edits and references are from the US Government, FINRA, US Law Schools, US Department of Labor and accreditation agencies, but the senior editor keeps removing these important links. Further I added links to published signed contracts and web links that are extremely important to expose the facts in relation to this article. Please help keep a balanced approach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfpcertified (talk • contribs) 00:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Garfield Finlay

Hello,

Gee whiz, please don't bite the newbie, Dr. Christine Finlay! She is obviously oblivious to the WP system, but I have offered to coach her.

In the meantime, I reverted your reversion until we can sort out the sourcing problem. Please be kind enough to allow us a sufficient grace period for that.

Thank you.

Georgejdorner (talk) 16:28, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

   My apologies I was thinking it was BLP when I reverted.Theroadislong (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Photographs from The Crossley ID Guide

Can you please confirm that you have uploaded these photographs with the correct license? Theroadislong (talk) 14:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes--confirmed Attribution/Sharable 3.0.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princetonnature (talk • contribs) 16:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC) Another thing to do for me

And i would appreciate your words..User:Miss_Bono/Eve_Hewson I am working on it in a sandbox before add the new information to the main article. Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

   It has too many quotations and it sounds like an article from Britain's Daily Mail newspaper and not an encyclopedia article.Theroadislong (talk) 19:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

       Oh I see now that The Daily Mail is where you sourced it all!Theroadislong (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
       Please feel free to change anything.  Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the Reverting Oreo.jpg Cookies!

Miss Bono has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

I appreciate your help :D

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add

		Cookies!
		Theroadislong has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with

Theroadislong has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

! Are You??

Are you working at Paul McGuiness article?? Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

   Errr... yes if you click on the history tab, you will see I've made about 50 edits recently, why do you ask?Theroadislong (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

       Nothing, specifically. well, yes... I was thinking about working on it, but now that I see you are, I'll step aside. It's me or I am noticing some kind of ironic tone in your message. Once again, if you don't want me to post on your talk just let me know. Thanks! :?  Miss Bono (zootalk) 18:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

           Sorry for the irony...but it is pretty obvious I've been working on the article! All good wishesTheroadislong (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

               Sorry for not noticing you were working on it. I have a lot of things to do and I just ask to make sure you have the article so I can focus myself in the improving of Bono's article to get it to GA. Can you stop hating me? Best wishes to U 2

PS: I asked you a few days ago if you would like to join WP U2 and you didn't relpy back. Please, don't ignore me, If you just don't want just have to say "NO"... Miss Bono (zootalk) 18:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

                       I'm not really interested in joining the project I edit many thousands of articles and most of the U2 articles are on my watch list already. WHY ever would you think I hate you? Maybe because English is your second language you are not understanding what I say? You're a mystery girl!...We're one but we're not the same We get to carry each other, carry each other One! BEST wishes xxxTheroadislong (talk) 19:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

                       Maybe is that English is my second language. Sorry for that :( I am trying to improve my English. Now I guess I am curious about what you say that I am a mystery girl? I'm not moving in mysterious ways lol What don't you answer me that... and another one, what those xxx mean?? ***I've got no home in this world, just gravity, luck and time-- Stateless***  Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

       Reply whenever you can, but do it, please, i want to know WHY do you think I am a mystery?? Cheers!! Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

           Just alluding to Bono's lyrics "She's a mystery to me"... you make many hundreds of edits to talk pages but VERY few to articles. All good wishes.Theroadislong (talk) 20:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

leading section at Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS)

Hi, I think the missed leading section problem is being solved in the named page in the heading. Also I would really appreciate if you lead me on how to tag the page to be better indexed by wikipedia as well as google searching engines.

Thanks in advance!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osco (talk • contribs) 11:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points—including any prominent controversies. Wikipedia does not concern itself with Google search engine results, we are here to build an encyclopaedia not promote businesses.Theroadislong (talk) 11:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

The article should start by saying what "Albumin Dialysis With The Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating System (MARS)" actually is! Theroadislong (talk) 11:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Ali Hewson

Good morning (my time) Theroadislong, I was checking Ali Hewson talk page and saw that she has a Low importance in WP:U2, I think she has a Mid. What do you think? Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 12:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm not exactly sure how the rating works but it certainly seems to me she should be "mid" and possibly "high importance" ...heat wave here in UK :) Theroadislong (talk) 12:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I am going to add the High Importance. What do you mean by heat wave here in UK , you were talking about the importance of the article or the weather. If it's about the weather, you better get a bottle of water :P Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 12:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

The weather of course... it's so rare for it to be hot here! Theroadislong (talk) 12:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I always thought about UK as a rainy country. But I heard that the weather changes in the blink of an eye. I would like to visit London :) Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 13:17, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I am visiting London next week :) Theroadislong (talk) 13:21, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

That's super cool!! Maybe I can visit London when I am 52 years old :( Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 16:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

I'd rather visit Cuba! Theroadislong (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Why don't you make a trip? It is fun here. I love Varadero beach, though I live in the Capital city: Havana. Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 17:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Yoko Ono article

Seems like someone is pissed with Yoko Ono and you. Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 19:07, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

How is that you saw that tiny work in Yoko Ono's article? I wish I could do the same with U2 articles. Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 19:46, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I use my WL. But I have no interface in Wikipedia. I don't see Wikipedia as you, so finding little words are hard to find. I will upload a picture of my watchilst tomorrow. And you will see what I am talking about. I don't even have the edit box. I have to do everything manually Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 20:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, as I promised, this is a view of how my interface is File:How_Miss_Bono_sees_Wikipedia.xcf. Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 18:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Reliable Source.

Here is a RELIABLE source.... In the King James Version of the Holy Bible in John 3:5 it says Jesus replied, "I assure you, no one can enter the Kingdom of God without being born of water and the Spirit. It IS talking about baptism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.23.208.208 (talk) 16:12, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

You will need to discuss this on the article talk page, not here. Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

OK

That was not an attack. I'm sorry you interpreted it as such. A punch in the face is an attack. A bunch of words on a computer screen isn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.45.59 (talk) 19:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, but that bunch of words aren't necessary. I call it verbal attack. Editing Wikipedia articles is more productive. Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 19:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Humanity is so weak and hopeless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.45.59 (talk) 19:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for Your future development of article about Revaz Lordkipandze. We and You can delete our articles also. We will pray for You and other real works for all Humans and peaceful relations of all nations in God. God will be with us+--Lia Palavandishvili (talk) 12:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Mullen and Clayton

I have added info to Clayton and added a picture to Mullen. Please check both up. Thanks! :) Miss Bono ^[zootalk]☆ 18:26, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Adam and Eve

Please do not revert my edits again at Adam and Eve. This is a very very divisive issue, it is best to err on the side of neutrality as this is an Encyclopedia not a soap box for your personal beliefs. If you have a problem with neutrality maybe this is not the place for you. Next time please take such issues to the talk page. Thank you--122.111.254.165 (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

My edit was entirely in line with all policies, the article is creation myth NOT creation story you may wish to start a discussion on changing the article name at the talk page? Please assume good faith.Theroadislong (talk) 15:35, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Bravo, that's a good idea (removal of the creation myth statment) it was totally unnecessary and just seamed divisive to me. I thought of doing that myself but I thought that would just stir up even more of a fuss, and it probably would have if I had done it. I commend you and support that change here.--122.111.254.165 (talk) 15:20, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

No worries...it hadn't been there very long when I searched the history, so it doesn't really have a consensus to be there at all. Theroadislong (talk) 18

47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

I see it's already been reverted! Theroadislong (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

• Would you now be willing to support the removal of that reference as per the discussion on the talk page (myth vs. religion)?--122.111.254.165 (talk) 11:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

ACE Limited edits

Hi, Im messaging you because you reverted the edits I made to the ACE Limited page. I would like to know why my edits were reversed because I did not deleate anything I simply added another section which gave more info about the compay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Umdterp1234 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your edit removed large amounts of content like the info box without explanation. Theroadislong (talk) 20

15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Optical Express

Hi, I've left a message on Optical Express talk page. Would appreciate if you could have a look and add comments. Thanks. --Hardlygone (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Hi, I have left a comment on Optical Express talk page in terms of one of the edits that you have made and suggested an alternative. I believe some of it could be construed as original research and would appreciate your thoughts on the talk page. --Hardlygone (talk) 11:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Peter Andre

Just a friendly reminder that not all seemingly silly edits are actually incorrect [1]. I, too, was about to revert but then took an extra few seconds to check the reference provided and saw the IP was correct. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:58, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! I've changed it back. Theroadislong (talk) 07:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Biblical criticism. (TW)

I didn't cite a reference as what I added is the scholarly consensus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarjeipark (talk • contribs) 15:13, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

In which case it should be very easy to supply references to back up your statement. Wikipedia only reports on what reliable sources say. Theroadislong (talk) 15:16, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wenfordbridge may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• death his son [[Seth Cardew]] carried on the tradition until 2005 when he relocated to Spain.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.wenfordbridge.com/index1.htm |title=Wenford Bridge Pottery |first= |last={

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Please click this.

Hello! New to Wikipedia and looking for some advice on my sandbox work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharmin.h (talk • contribs) 07:14, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I can't see any sandbox work. Theroadislong (talk) 08:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

h3ll0 Theroadislong

I need a huge favour from you. Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 13:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

...what can I do for you? Theroadislong (talk) 13:59, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

I am working on this to add it to the main article of Bono, but it needs references, I took it form the es.Wikipedia but they didn't have references on it. Hope you can help. Best! Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 14:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. btw you have message at the Teahouse :) Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 17:33, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Seconds (song)

I made some changes there. would you mind reviewing it? Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 19:24, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Do the changes you think are the best, even remove the picture. Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 19:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Knitting edit

My inclusion of the Craftsy link on the Knitting page was not at all a marketing ploy. Craftsy.com stores free (and for sale) patterns like Ravelry (I added the link to Craftsy right after the Ravelry mention). If it had been better to include the link in a different manner, let me know. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tsidel (talk • contribs) 17:53, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not use inline external links at all it's considered spamming. If you can find suitable content that could be referenced to the site it might be acceptable?Theroadislong (talk) 18:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

How can the previous link to Ravelry be included then? (I'm new to Wiki-editing, and I understand that it'd be better to include a link as a citation, but if the link is to give a demonstration of an online community that does what the wikipage is about.. how can one community be promoted over another?) I'm learning. Thank you. Tsidel (talk) 18:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

The link to Ravelry is a wikipedia link whereas the link you added was an external link if there was an article about Craftsy.com it might be possible to add it. Kind regards Theroadislong (talk) 18:19, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Ah! That makes sense, and I feel dumb for missing it. Thank you. Sorry for the trouble. Tsidel (talk) 18:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Remove external link

Hi Theroadislong,

I refer to your message from 16th July. You removed an external link I inserted in the page "Web conferencing", but I can´t comprehend your statement. The Website I linked to, http://webconferencing-test.com/en/online-meeting-home, includes usefull content in the context of the article: The Web conferencing test page offer a broad market overview for web conferencing tools and gives information about their functionality, usuability, security and costs. It is conform to the requirements of Wikipedia, it is a full independent and reliable website.

So I would be glad if you recall the removing and accept the external link to http://webconferencing-test.com/en/online-meeting-home.

Thanks in advance Andy wolter (talk) 08:31, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry I disagree... it is spam. Theroadislong (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

I am concerned that you thought I was advertising my book. I have to inform you that as I have just returned from the Isles of Scilly, my novel is up there with Michael Morpurgo and Nevil Shute as described on the Wikipedia page.It was not meant as soapboxing. I don't need to do that, my book is selling fine on the islands with local bookshops. The story is based around the island life and visitors are finding it most interesting.It is just another book which readers can enjoy if they are going to the islands.The story is based on Scilly and I was informing readers that this is just another book to add to the list of novels about Scilly. It is actually on sale locally as is Morpurgo and Shute and all the other books about Scilly which you have mentioned in the information about the islands. It is generally accepted by the local people as a romance novel based on Scilly. I really don't feel that this book should be left out of the list as it describes island life really well and has already proved itself.

Perhaps you might inform me how I can include my novel in the list of information about Scilly? The book is well accepted by the local people on Scilly. I know this for sure having just been there.

Thanks for your help (Lin Treadgold (talk) 21:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC))

I think you may be misunderstanding how Wikipedia works. Firstly writing about yourself means you have a big WP:conflict of interest. Michael Morpurgo and Nevil Shute are notable authors with their own Wikipedia articles. There is no article for Lin Treadgold yet on Wikipedia so no indication of your own WP:Notability. You will need multiple references to the book in WP:reliable sources to provide evidence of the book's notability, your own observations are not enough. Hope this helps. Theroadislong (talk) 10:07, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for your explanations. I was unaware of the notability aspect and thought that is was all to do with information to help others discover matters of interest, especially regarding the islands. My book does exactly that and although I am an unknown author on Wikipedia, I hope very soon I shall have several books published so that I can be an author of notoriety! Pity really because my novel is so popular at the moment with the tourists. I recently sold 160 books at a signing session on the islands. Not bad for a new book on a small island! I thought it would help with the information on your site. Ah well. Another time eh?

All the best to you,

(Lin Treadgold (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2013 (UTC))

POV in Bono

Should I remove that from Ali Hewson too? Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 18:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I think it's better without, it seemed to be asserting an opinion in Wikipedia's voice? Theroadislong (talk) 20:09, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I removed it in both EDUN and Ali Hewson :) Thanks for the advice... Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 20:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

BTW, I found some kind of GA review on Bono and posted it in the talk page, maybe you can help me to fix a few of them, seems I have english problems. Would you take a look? Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 20:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

WhitePages.com

Hi Theroadislong. I wanted to let you know I've introduced myself on the Talk page of WhitePages.com as a PR rep hoping to improve the article with a COI. The editor that was using User: WhitePages Inc. was very apologetic about any prior transgressions. I noticed you reverted her here and thought you might be interested in looking at our draft in the future. I'll be complying with WP:COI by offering content for consideration on the Talk page and leaving editorial decisions up to regular editors that serve our reader's best interest exclusively. I'm not always 100% neutral, but companies tend to make dramatic improvements to Wikipedia with my help and I've started standardizing on bringing them up to GA where possible. CorporateM (Talk) 00:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Bono

I left a message there, please, do you think you can help? Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 13:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar For You!

		The U2 Barnstar
		I hereby award you the U2 Barnstar for your efforts in helping Wikiproject U2. Congratulations! Thanks for your efforts. Miss Bono [zootalk] 14:51, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Paarl Mountain Geology

Hi Theroadislong,

This message is regarding the Paarl Mountain Geology entry into Wikipedia (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Paarl_Mountain).

I am a member of the sub-committee (WCGSSA) that was responsible for writing and compiling the pdf which we uploaded to the website (https://sites.google.com/site/gssawcb/geo-heritage-initiatives/geosite-1-paarl-mountain).

The main aim of this sub-committee is to provide free information on the Geology in our area and as such we decided to copy the information in the pdf "brochure" to wikipedia where were hoped it would reach a wider audience.

I understand why this has been flagged as a copyright problem, but I'm not too sure how to prove that it is in fact our committee's original content that has been posted by us.

We hope to add more geological information to wikipedia in the future and I would be very grateful if you could advise me on how to go about avoiding future copyright issues.

Thanks

Claire (Geoheritage) Geoheritage.cape (talk) 13:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

I think User:Moonriddengirl may have answered your question on your talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

EDUN 2.0

Thanks for reverting that. I had an edit confilct. Anyways! can you check if the information is correct? Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 17:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Checked and added back with a reference. Theroadislong (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

thanks again. Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 17:44, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey, wandering around, I found an annoying template here EDUN#Mission. Can you please, seek for some third-party source? Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 17:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

What do you think about our new picture for Bono infobox? Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 13:11, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

It looks great! Theroadislong (talk) 13:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Hehe, thanks! Now Bono is Mr. McDreamy lol-- User:Quadell helped me! I just edited the image, so The Edge disappear and some blue glows as well. Glad you've liked it. Let's see what does Y2kcrazjoker4 think about it :) Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 13:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Nothing yet! The change of the pict was undone. Well, it seems like I will have to travel to Ireland to take a picture of Bono by myself at daylight :P. Will be next time. Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 14:21, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

I am leaving

I am leaving Wikipedia. It was so nice to meet you. Take care. Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 13:01, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Really sorry to hear that...come back again at some point maybe when you have better internet? Take care too. x Theroadislong (talk) 13:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

For better Internet I will have to move to another country :'( I really enjoyed our misunderstandings and I am grateful for all the help you gave me. Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 13:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Lucy Hutchinson (Actress)

Sorry about the link. I was under the impression that the YouTube links were acceptable as the original 'Goodfellas' link was done by somebody else and has been on there for quite some time. I can't really see why it isn't relevant? The adverts were both televised and are in the public domain so could be sourced by anyone anyway. Both of these links are very relevant to the page? Neither of the links are a direct advert to Lucy Hutchinson, they are just examples of her work that can be shown without breaching copyright. Please reconsider this and let me know your answer?

Thanks

Gary Hutchinson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gary Hutchinson (talk • contribs) 13:44, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

There may be a case for adding them but I was looking at this before I removed them. Theroadislong (talk) 13:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok, like I say it's not my call. I was just following suit from a previous editor on the page.--Gary Hutchinson (talk) 13:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

It's extremely unlikely that the advertisements are in the public domain; what made you think that they were? --Orange Mike | Talk 15:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)