User talk:Theo Scientist Physics

This is Theo Scientist Physics's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Theo Scientist Physics, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not even going tyo search for the reference. LLM hallucinates

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Theo Scientist Physics/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theo Scientist Physics! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Timtrent. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:56, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user subpage at User:Theo Scientist Physics may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:01, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Theo Scientist Physics

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Theo Scientist Physics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:59, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because (your reason here) --Theo Scientist Physics (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am trying to have a conversation being made on the theory proposed to elaborate on the potential of such discovery that is a newborn

I am afraid you misunderstand. It is User:Theo Scientist Physics that is up for speedy deletion as a misuse of a user page, whereas your draft is at User:Theo Scientist Physics/sandbox. These are different items.

In the draft you have "written" a draft article. That is subject to review and has been declined as very likely the output of an LLM.

You speak of "the theory proposed to elaborate on the potential of such discovery that is a newborn" which says that this is a topic unlikely to be covered with significant in multiple reliable sources, independent of the topic. Wikipedia is a tertiary source. That means we only record in our own words what is written about a topic in reliable secondary sources.

Wikipedia is also not a forum. We so not "have a conversation being made on the theory proposed" because there is no conversation to be had. It either qualifies for an article or it does not. Your LLM created draft does not.

Questions or concerns over this shoudl be raised at WP:AFCHD, where an automatic template is created if you go to your user sandbox and click the third bullet down in the darl pink frame which holds the decline rationale. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but why is my article not being accepted Propagation of Photons: A Quantum Field Perspective this one ? Theo Scientist Physics (talk) 16:42, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the contents of the decline rationale, above. Once you confirm that you have read them and understand them we can discuss this further.

To help you, you have used a pretty useless mechanism to generate the text. An LLM is deprecated and is unlikely ever to be good enough, certainly in its current implementation. The references are not worth checking because LLMs hallucinate.

This will not proceed further as present6ed here. We require prose to be written by human beings, and to be referenced correctly. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For additional opinions, not just my own, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because (your reason here) --Theo Scientist Physics (talk) 16:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am experimenting i have no intent to make such website as a free hosting site my only aim is to create a subject of interest for physicists in order to elaborate on this theory and find its limitations thank you !

PLease read the answer I gave you above. There is truly no need to open multiple threads to contest deletion. One is pe3rfeclty sufficient. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:19, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You say that you want to "create a subject of interest for physicists in order to elaborate on this theory" that is NOT what wikipedia is for. In order for an article’s subject to be considered notable by the Wikipedia community, we require that it receive significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject this is what you base an article on. Your draft appears to have been copied and pasted from somewhere and reads like an essay. Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Theo Scientist Physics/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Theo Scientist Physics/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]