User talk:Themovieguy2023

Welcome!

Hi Themovieguy2023! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 03:23, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: White T (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previously deleted 3 separate times and this version does not appear to make a case to keep it from a 4th. References are about the creators and simply mention that they did the film. Others are unreliable (e.g., Twitter, Wikipedia) to show notability. I did a WP:BEFORE and found no references where I could make a case for notability so unless there are some hidden sources I could not locate, I cannot see this one being found notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:White T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 03:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Themovieguy2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 03:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: White T (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Linkedin.com, YouTube, TVguide, Pinterest, Twitter and Wikipedia are not reliable source.s

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:White T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:White T has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:White T. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:15, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:White T has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:White T. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for your input and help. I think I've added everything necessary to this point. I don't want to tinker with it anymore..... hopefully someone can give a final look through and add/delete anything they feel. Themovieguy2023 (talk) 12:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it will be accepted, adding more and more poor quality sources isn't helpful. Theroadislong (talk) 13:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I'm not understanding the "poor sources" aspect? I'm literally attaching article links of all nature. screen rant, rotten tomatoes, personal interviews, IMDB, distribution websites, -- from the looks of other various wiki pages similar references are used. Themovieguy2023 (talk) 13:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: White T (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Of of the deleted citations, the Village Voice was the only plausibly useful one for any claim of notability, and even that barely clears the bar for non-trivial coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:White T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: White T (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I still don't see any improvement in reliable sources. Please use ones that are in WP:RSP or major newspapers/magazines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:White T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 03:57, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:White T has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:White T. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:18, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Theroadislong...... the heavy.com article goes very in depth on the film. Also found articles on some other prominent websites. Themovieguy2023 (talk) 16:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: White T (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm just seeing more refbombing when it should be stripped of non-reliable sources. Any further resubmissions without improvement will result in a reject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:White T and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Angus - with all due respect.... out of every reference listed are you saying "not one of them is reliable?" Is the (village/heavy/Comedy Hype link/ storage wars interview w/ jason hughes) are none of those useable?

One person said the village article would be adequate. Another used said the heavy.com article was adequate..... Themovieguy2023 (talk) 17:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are WP:REFBOMBING just dumping 22 sources at the end of the article, if the sources were placed after the content that they support it would help the reviewers see the wood for the trees. Theroadislong (talk) 17:40, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. This is what I needed to have clarified. Thank you! Themovieguy2023 (talk) 17:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I said the Village Voice article was the only plausibly useful source when I declined the submission and that it wasn't much. Notability needs non-trivial coverage by multiple independent reliable sources. For films, multiple substantive professional reviews in reputable media is the general standard. That is still not demonstrated. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:China Marie (artist).png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:China Marie (artist).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Эlcobbola _talk 23:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you as well Themovieguy2023 (talk) 03:21, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:China Marie has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:China Marie. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like i'm on a merri-go-round that never ends on wikipedia. Themovieguy2023 (talk) 15:54, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I own this photo. Pleaser undo your changes. Themovieguy2023 (talk) 22:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: China Marie (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To establish notability, the references need to be independent and via reliable sources. Interviews aren't considered independent (unless they are accompanied by extensive editorial). Also, there are still some issues with tone. She has a great story but Wikipedia articles are just about the facts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:China Marie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 01:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:White T soundtrack playing on rdio "heavy rotation" in 2013.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:White T soundtrack playing on rdio "heavy rotation" in 2013.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:White T

Hello, Themovieguy2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:White T, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:China Marie

Hello, Themovieguy2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:China Marie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]