Jump to content

User talk:Thelb4/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

As of

Hi, I was wondering why you were taking away the "As of" links? They're useful to keep track of information for which there is a reasonable possibility of it becoming outdated. — Matt Crypto 14:15, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I didn't realise that. It's... Thelb4! 16:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
No problem. I hope you wouldn't mind if I restored the links? (Or you could do so yourself?) — Matt Crypto 20:42, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Final Fantasy N64 AfD

Thelb4, I noticed your vote over the Final Fantasy N64 articles for deletion vote. I wasn't sure if you were aware of this, but the article in question is actually redundant. The original article, Final Fantasy SGI demo, has been around for a number of months, and is better cited and researched (IMO, of course). I was wondering if I could ask you to consider changing your "keep" vote to "merge"? If not, I apologize for bothering you. – Seancdaug 02:40, 7 October 2005 (UTC)


Thanks on your Support on the RfA

Thanks For The Support!
Thanks For The Support!

Just curious, what is the IB 4? Karmafist 22:03, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

'IB' stands for the town I live in; 4 is for... no reason. It's... Thelb4! 06:14, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Ryokosubaru.jpg

The picture should be listed under public domain. AyrtonSenna

FPC

Absolutely. Please edit it away, and upload it under a separate filename as an alternate version. Thanks for your help. :)--Pharos 02:48, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Cleanup taskforce

Hi, I just added a task to your desk. It may be a bit outside your field - if you are unable to help with the cleanup for any reason feel free to move it to sombody elses desk. Cheers, Andreww 04:59, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

I accept it. It's... Thelb4! 09:17, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

copied from my talk page:

I was assigned the Dave Walker article with the Cleanup Task force. I have done some copyediting and wonder: how 'serious' is the 'serious copyediting'? Do you want all the brackets gone? It's... Thelb4! 13:20, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

reply:

grin. Sorry about that. Serious copyediting means it looked such a mess that I didn't want to do it myself. I looked at it and it appeared to be just a smear. It didn't even seem to be in real sentences.
I happened to glance at it when I saw it had been assigned, to see if anything was happening, and it already looks a lot better. Thank you!
Do you think the flow needs further improving? Are sections logically grouped? RJFJR 13:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

Indu

I tried to move it, but I think I screwed up the move. Not sure what your question is. If you think it belongs in the main space rather than Wiktionary that's fine with me. --JJay 16:49, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Calm down. I said I made a mistake, didn't I? It was a first attempt and I have since used the template. --JJay 20:48, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing me on that. Are you sure you can't classify disambuiguation as stub? I mean, it still looks to me like it was a topic that need more information... Altough you might be right about this specific page I've made, let me give you an hipotetical example that I can think of where a stub and disambiguation should be together:

--- The article is called "scrubs"

---

Let's suppose both links exist and works. Now, wouldn't this be a stub?

---

What about even another example? Let's say hypoteticaly it's filthy and that everybody knows that it has morethan 2 meanings. Then I want to add 2 meanings now, because I don't have the time to do the rest. I would call it a stub hoping somebody else would do the rest.

closing it up

Just to leave the text at my side, so it's ok if you want to clear this topic in your talk. :)

oops, forgot to sign o_O --Cawas 00:24, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

POP (and other channel) ratings figures

Are all available from the BARB here. --Kiand 20:56, 10 November 2005 (UTC)