User talk:Thekostiknator

sweet

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the Final Straw!

OK, I just undid your edit to the Freeport High School page, and I have spoken to you several times. I'm sick and tired of you ruining the hard work of people who are trying to make important edits to Wikipedia. I'm going to have you blocked, you obviously can't be trusted to make good edits to Wikipedia.

Bkissin (talk) 01:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

        You are one to talk. I didn't deliberately make any vandalism to Freeport High School's page. Someone screwed up the grading and i just changed it back. Thekostiknator (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox deletion

One of your userboxes (User:Basketball110/NBA Live 07) will soon be deleted, due to image deletion. A variant is User:Basketball110/Live 08. Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 23:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Where's the hidden page?

Pretty please? *makes cat face* Thekostiknator (talk) 13:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Basketball110/76876876726734 -- Gurch (talk) 16:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red Sox WikiProject Invite

Please accept this invite to join the Red Sox WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Red Sox. Simply click here to accept!

Any questions? Just ask! Thanks.--RyRy5 (talk ♠ Review) 00:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hi, and welcome to the Red Sox WikiProject! We are a group of (mainly) Red Sox fans who help to improve coverage related to the Boston Red Sox on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here are a few suggestions.

You can check out topics on the main page.
You can add {{WikiProject Boston Red Sox}} to talk pages of Boston Red Sox-related articles, and assess them as well.
Check out the to do list for the WikiProject, and opt to try and complete some of those tasks.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.

-- RyRy5 (talk ♠ Review) 04:42, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOX

Anything, really. There's thousands of biographies that need work and over a hundred seasonal pages that could use some expansion as well. jj137 (talk) 15:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks in the article Henry Loughlin

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Henry Loughlin. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. De728631 (talk) 18:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Whitney Megquier

A tag has been placed on Whitney Megquier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Whitney Megquier

A tag has been placed on Whitney Megquier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. role^player 18:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Whitney Megquier, you will be blocked from editing. role^player 18:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

new page

hey Thekostiknator (talk) 19:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to August 26. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CalendarWatcher (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Henry Loughlin

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Henry Loughlin, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Flying Toaster 16:09, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Harry Hamilton Laughlin, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Flying Toaster 16:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page George W. Bush. Such edits constitute defacement and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Kingpin13 (talk) 16:24, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to George W. Bush. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Kingpin13 (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thekostiknator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did nothing wrong, it was all Henry's fault... I stated all truths in my posts and this is unjustified. Kiss the ring... NOW!!!

Decline reason:

This edit is indefensible. If you make further unblock requests with this tone your talk page will be protected as well. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.