User talk:The Introvert Next To You

February 2020

Hello, I'm Ferret. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, DayZ (video game), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: No, thanks to you!

It's OK, the IP who added this seemed to either use a too literal translation from the Spanish source or was in a hurry, because it had some mistakes (the sentence called Priti Patel the "British Miniter of the Interior", when her English title is actually just "Home Secretary"), so it's understandable to assume that of the link. Cheers!--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10 / 10 I should've done better evaluations into this person but you clearly did that! Thanks again, hope to see you in the history/edit section again! The Introvert Next To You (talk) 23:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Current_events. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.AggiesNeverLie (talk) 21:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And all my words come back to me in shades of mediocrity

"Lmao vandalism? You realize this happens with almost every major protest? Including things such as George Floyd, voting rights, Jan. 6 riot, gun violence/rights and many, MANY more. The charges they receive will be minor (if any at all) its all about showmanship. How about instead of calling it vandalism you do some research and realize this happens at LEAST twice a year, nor does it effect the rest of the world. If they were charged with a felony it would be internationally important but its..."

you are laughing because you didn't pay any attention to the story. LAWMAKERS were arrested, not protestors, as you clearly only thought about when you laughed your head off.. Not at all conducive to a good edit, you are not even trying to understand what happened. You mocked me but you are the one who looks like a fool to everyone else who sees what you said. I have pity for you. AggiesNeverLie (talk) 22:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Um no I did pay attention. I pay VERY close attention to my nations news. HENCE why I could tell this was a DOMESTIC protest about a DOMESTIC issue. It has no reason to be international news. Lawmakers are arrested CONSTANTLY, yu get mad at me but as it looks, I have most people agreeing with me. Truth is, I laughed because you called me vandalism. I'm trying to stop the stereotype of Americans being the center of the universe. We literally have drama 24/7, trust me a couple of law makers getting misdemeanors is nothing The Introvert Next To You (talk) 04:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about you refrain from falsely bullying people with "vandalism" simply because you disagree with their point of view The Introvert Next To You (talk) 04:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Welcome!

Hi The Introvert Next To You! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 13:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]