User talk:TheUltamateBoss3900

Hello And Welcome to my New Talk Page

WWE Crown Jewel

Any reason you're undoing MusikBot's edits removing the protection template? You do know that the page isn't protected, right? JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes,but an admin put it there for a reason.TheUltamateBoss3900 (talk) 22:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it's expired. You can't put it back if it doesn't mean anything. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, on page Milwaukee there is vandalism stating that WWE Superstar Aiden English had some type of relationship against Fellow WWE Superstar Lana Somebody's got to protect that page.

November 2018

Hello, I'm NotTheFakeJTP. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, WWE 2K19, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm out on a Holiday for 2 months,but I will find a reliabe source TheUltamateBoss3900 (talk) 18:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TheUltamateBoss3900

A tag has been placed on User:TheUltamateBoss3900 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:03, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because...If I return to Wikipedia from my Holiday I can't log on to my account, I would most likely not to have a Wikipedia account ever again --TheUltamateBoss3900 (talk) 21:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Auska's Undefeated Streak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Auska's Undefeated Streak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auska's Undefeated Streak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 23:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit fully-protected template

Hey. Just letting you know I removed {{edit fully-protected}} from Auska's Undefeated Streak again. That template is for use on talk pages to request edits be made to pages that are already fully protected. It does not actually protect an article, and is not for use on articles. Only administrators can protect pages; non-admins can go to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection to make a request there. I'd like to invite you to read Wikipedia's protection policy to learn more about when page protection is and isn't appropriate. Let me know if you have any other questions. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 00:49, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of deleted pages

Do not recreate pages that were deleted per discussion at WP:AfD, as you did with WWE SmackDown 1000. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 13:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Auska's Undefeated Streak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Auska's Undefeated Streak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen D. Folf (talk • contribs) 00:56, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Auska's Undefeated Streak

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Auska's Undefeated Streak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 22:42, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Do not recreate pages that were deleted or redirected by WP:AfD consensus. -- Scott (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Hey. I've noticed you've been running into some conflicts about your editing, and I wanted to reach out to see if you have any questions about how thinks work on Wikipedia, since it seems you might not be too familiar with our policies and guidelines, specifically notability, the deletion policy, the protection policy, and recreating material deleted after a deletion discussion. I'm pretty familiar with these guidelines and policies, and thought I would give you the opportunity to ask any questions about them you might have. Let me know if there's anything I can clarify for you. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 15:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TheUltamateBoss3900's Life (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

Not a draft article. you might put this on your userpage

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TheUltamateBoss3900's Life and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TheUltamateBoss3900's Life, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 04:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheUltamateBoss3900! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 04:01, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:TheUltamateBoss3900's Life

Draft:TheUltamateBoss3900's Life, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:TheUltamateBoss3900's Life and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:TheUltamateBoss3900's Life during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CoolSkittle (talk) 06:02, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh come on it is an article an article about me you goofball TUB3900 (talk) 12:10, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read up on relevant policies and guidelines, including WP:Your first article, WP:Notability, and WP:NOTAWEBHOST. Your continuous creation of articles and drafts against Wikipedia policies and intentions are borderline disruptive. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is Not distruptive TUB3900 (talk) 22:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tell that to the admin who blocks you if you do it again. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 19:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huh ? TUB3900 (talk) 20:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He's saying either abide by article guidelines (stop violating WP:G4, don't create drafts based on your life, follow policy) or you will be WP:Blocked. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:44, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI thread

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is TheUltamateBoss3900.

It would be in your best interest to talk to people. --Tarage (talk) 23:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Changing User Group to Administrator TUB3900 (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You want to become an administrator? Please read WP:RFA. CoolSkittle (talk) 00:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The only way to "change your user group to administrator" is to get yourself nominated to be an admin, and then go through an RfA (Request for Adminship), a very rigorous process where the community examines your qualifications and decides, individually, whether to support you or oppose you.
If you would take a bit of advice, there not an iota of a chance that you would pass an RfA at this point in your editing career. Oh, you can nominate yourself and open an RfA, but it will be closed almost immediately as either a WP:SNOW close (as in "not a snowball's chance in hell") or WP:NOTNOW. What you need to do it edit productively for some number of years (2 or 3), keep your nose clean (blocks will almost automatically prevent you from becoming an admin), learn the site's policies and norms of editing and follow them, and then, if everything goes OK, file to be an admin. First, though, you might want to read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for trolling and/or extraordinary incompetence.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 01:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too much disruption. Plus, no one is this clueless. Plus, you know about RFA becauseyour previous account created an RFA page. No, just too much. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, if I had known that, I wouldn't have given them serious advice. Just call me "patsy". Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He just blocked me for no reason so I'm quitting Wikipedia until I get an expiration date for my block 2601:189:57F:59A0:A1BD:3FDC:98EC:AC2D (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TheUltamateBoss3900 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23326 was submitted on Nov 21, 2018 03:14:53. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheUltamateBoss3900 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Even though I am a good Wikipedia user I understand about being blocked I am sorry for everything I have done. I just couldn't log on to my other account

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The B-Team (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The B-Team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The B-Team, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 04:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The B-Team has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The B-Team. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 09:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The B-Team

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The B-Team, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 14:28, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If no one wants to trust me

If none wants to trust me here it's best for you to delete me from Wikipedia I Hate myself I Quit Wikipedia I Hate Being Blocked I want an Expiration Date for my Block that means you User:Floquenbeam I want a Expiration date for my Block if not I QUIT WIKIPEDIA TUB3900 (talk) 14:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that would be for the best. ---Floquenbeam (talk) 14:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All I'm asking is for an Expiration date for my BlockTUB3900 (talk) 14:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that. If it would help, I can modify the block to expire in ~~3 years~~ one year. I expect you'll be more mature by then. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC) Actually, 1 year might be enough to mature. But if you evade the block, all bets are off. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can do that. looks like I won't be quitting after all TUB3900 (talk) 14:51, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, block has been modified to expire in one year. Good luck with school and any other non-Wikipedia related tasks. I won't belabor the point, but if this kind of disruption occurs when your block expires, or if you are found to be evading this block, you'll be re-blocked indefinitely. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- TheUltamateBoss3900 is Confirmed to TheUltamateFan01 (talk · contribs). Both are on the same exact IP as Trevor gonsalves 2 (talk · contribs), who is CU-blocked as a Confirmed sock of The abominable Wiki troll (talk · contribs). That's enough for me. I've converted this to a CU block and revoked talk page access. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks, NRP. That information would have been more useful 10 minutes ago, before I made myself look completely gullible... :) --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TheUltamateBoss3900 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23331 was submitted on Nov 21, 2018 15:10:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

TheUltamateBoss3900 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23363 was submitted on Nov 24, 2018 21:08:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:08, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheBigBoss3900, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 04:46, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]