User talk:TheDoDahMan

Welcome!

Hello, TheDoDahMan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:04, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

About the war on drugs comment

You have deleted my edits List of countries by incarceration rates. However I maintain that my edit was unbiased as saying that " the war on drugs is a continuation of slavery" is an unsourced and biased claim. It is at best a personnal opinion. As can be gathered from the formulation "One may say". Same for the "euphemism for war on black people" the article could say that the war on drugs disproportionately affects black people. But the formulation and policy known as "war on drugs" has never been intended to be a euphemism for war on black people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.44.130.205 (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The material I deleted was unsourced and unreferenced. It doesnt take a reference to dismiss an unsourced claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.44.130.205 (talk) 17:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdate Clarification

Please cite the source for the claim that the birthdate for businessman, Alex Meruelo is March 27, 1954, and not 1964. Thank you. MORE... Citing Bloomberg Article 192.67.40.254 (talk) 18:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

192.67.40.254You are correct! The LA Times says he is 55. Go ahead and change it, but put please in a reference.TheDoDahMan (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Capital 958FM

Hi,I change some of the content as I would want to swop the time belts of the weekday to be above the weekend timebelts. If u can help me to make the changes. Because now is the weekend timebelts above the weekday timebelts still. By right it should be swop. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.166.73.171 (talk) 10:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, TheDoDahMan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TFD (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t talk to me please— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:248:8000:2f93:5c23:f5b9:c26d:3fab (talk) 20:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woodfibre LNG Terminal (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft currently has only one independent source. Look for more mainstream press sources, but avoid press releases by involved people or organizations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Woodfibre LNG Terminal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Woodfibre LNG Terminal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheDoDahMan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fake North American Rugby league teams

Just want to ask you why you are deleting the references posted up on the fake teams who don't even have names yet can we have speedies, prods or merge them. They don't exist yet! 2001:8003:C000:5600:2425:4BF:E4F7:D5BD (talk) 12:14, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits and Unverified Claims

Regarding your message to me about the "Circle Game" prank, let me clarify. The statement that reads "In the early 1950s, in Chicago, the middle finger was used" is not verified by any footnotes. The statement also contradicts a claim on another page titled "The OK Gesture" that states the "Circle Game" existed "Since the 1980s" (not early 1950s, as the article previously claimed). This is why I made the change you currently see, I stand in good faith that my edits are constructive. This was not a sandbox experiment, and it was not intended to disparage the article in any way. Thank you for reading.

References: Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page)."The Okay Gesture" http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/OK_gestureCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page)."List of School Pranks" http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/List_of_school_pranksCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). Fawning Girl (talk) 21:02, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheDoDahMan! You created a thread called Inserting an article section into an existing article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi TheDoDahMan! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:35, Sunday, May 26, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

CUVA

Hi The DoDahMAn, I have sent a message to yo on the CUVA sub page, reminding you to " provide "hist diff" - see Wikipedia:Complete diff and link guide (click 2 diff version (blue button) and provide the URL)". I am not sure you aware of that, so I write to yo here. Pls see below as the example of what I meant.

Vandalism 1. [1] vandalism (plus reason if possible) and I placed vandal warning level 2 on editor talk page.

Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheDoDahMan! You created a thread called Disappearing user subpage at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DoDahMan - sorry, don't know how to comment on your talk. You asked about a deletion I `made to an article, which you reinstated because you think it is vandalism. The paragraph was deleted as it is libellous. The "source" given for a libellous allegation of serious criminal activity is a personal blog written by someone with a political axe to grind. That is NOT a suitable source for an allegation of criminal activity. You need to show an actual conviction. In this instance there is no criminal conviction nor have the police pursued any such allegation against the person named. This means the comment on Wikipedia is LIBELLOUS. That is why it has been removed. Please do not reinstate. Thanks and apologies for possibly adding to your talk thread in the wrong place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.240.205 (talk) 17:28, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Mahabharat 2013 page

Hi TheDoDahMan,

I have not deleted any content. I have edited and reordered content. This was done to provide some clarity to the characters of the Mahabharat and how they are related to each other. I have ordered the names familywise. You can check on the same.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.34.155 (talk) 18:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. TheDoDahMan (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You are a true Wikipedian! Jake The Great!📞talk! 10:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hey--thanks for this edit! But keep your eyes peeled when you undo vandalism so that you undo it all, and not just the most recent edit. Thanks again! Grandpallama (talk) 13:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheDoDahMan. You have new messages at 94.197.1.111's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Not vandalism

This was not vandalism, and you should not have reverted it. Sam Sailor 00:00, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam Sailor: I thought they were calling the person a witch, which is a fantasy. At the time I didn't realise it was a disambiguation. Sorry. I will apologise to the user.TheDoDahMan (talk) 21:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message

I was actually removing harassment on you by a Ultraman Hater. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@FilmandTVFan28: Thanks! It doesn't bother me. I look at it this way. If they hate me, I'm being effective and that pleases me. I'm surprised anyone today even knows about UltraMan. Used to watch him all the time when I was a kid...TheDoDahMan (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not vandalism

Hi there! I want to mention that this revision from an IP is not blatant vandalism. You should assume the IP made the edit in good faith. Although the edit was grammatically incorrect, it is not vandalism at all. Only revert if it's 100% blatant vandalism. Cheers! INeedSupport ^:3 20:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@INeedSupport: OK. I just thought they were being wise guys.TheDoDahMan (talk) 21:03, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@INeedSupport: I have apologised to the user on their talk page.TheDoDahMan (talk) 21:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine! Hopefully the IP will be alright with that. INeedSupport ^:3 22:00, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@INeedSupport: Doesn't really matter now. After i made the change (which was NOT grammatically incorrect, for your information), i did more research. I found that she and her sister are half-breeds. So no point in calling her Hellenic. You either ARE Hellenic or you're not. There's no in between. Since she is half and half, it would be insulting to call her Hellenic, let alone British. But anyway, it's left as British now, so it doesn't matter. (I have no idea how to format this reply. And google is useless on instructions) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.91.153.152 (talk) 20:34, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You rock! Jake The Great!📞talk! 13:28, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

New message from CASSIOPEIA

Hello, TheDoDahMan. You have new messages at User:CASSIOPEIA/CVUA/TheDoDahMan.
Message added 10:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You could report to AIV. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CASSIOPEIA which one?TheDoDahMan (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

anyone "if" they make an vandalized edit after warning lvl 4 (not yet so far). CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I'm watching 9 IPs right now and none of them have made a move since the most recent warnings....TheDoDahMan (talk) 12:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ares - user Okfield. one more vandalized edit to go. keep an eye. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Egyptian religion user 80.235.229.59 CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

can report this one Michael Gove user 176.126.224.58. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

oops

had left wrong msg - thanks for yours - changed mine JarrahTree 13:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woodfibre LNG Terminal (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AmericanAir88 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Very one sided article. Uses words like "should" and "controversial"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Woodfibre LNG Terminal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Woodfibre LNG Terminal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AmericanAir88^(talk) 20:42, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stephane Graff

Hello, I noticed the SPI case. If IP address disruption persists at that article, I recommend asking for semi-protection at WP:RFPP. —Paleo Neonate – 10:07, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@PaleoNeonate:, Thanks for the advice! I was actually looking into that when I got you message.TheDoDahMan (talk) 10:31, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, —Paleo Neonate – 10:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Stephane Graff; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
See my comments at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2A02:C7D:83D:4800:A516:130:8812:3C69. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stephane Graff edit warring

Hi The DoDahMan, I am disappointed that you have violated the WP:3RR rule. I had a look at the hist log of the above page, form your edit on ' 04:29, June 5, 2019‎ TheDoDahMan' to '01:49, June 6, 2019‎ TheDoDahMan' there are a total of 4 revert edits done by you. I have informed you, to bear in mind, at least in 2 different occasions do not make more than 3 non-vandalism revert edits within 24 hours on the same page for it would considered WP:3RR violation. Please start a discussion, by pinging all the involved parties and do cc admin user: Ivanvector, on Stephane Graff's talk page and also send a notification of the discussion (provide link) on all the users involved talk pages. This is important and your urgent action is required. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CASSIOPEIA I will do that but first I urge you to re-examine the history page, I can find no edits by myself at the times in question and certainly not more that 3 in a 24 hour period. I can find NO edits by me on 06 Jun 2019 .TheDoDahMan (talk) 09:34, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The DoDahMan, See below. I guess they counted the 4th as a revert.

04:29, June 5, 2019‎ TheDoDahMan
04:57, June 5, 2019‎ TheDoDahMan
13:16, June 5, 2019‎ TheDoDahMan
01:49, June 6, 2019 TheDoDahMan

I have witnessed a number of long term active vandal fighters violated 3RR when fighting vandalism. They got a short term blocked or they user right was taken from them and most of them retired from Wikipedia even many of us did ask them to come back when their frustration and anger subside but the never did. In you case you were warned but not blocked but admin did require you to settle the issue in the article talk page. Please note that one involved editor has addressed the incident in the article talk page, just response accordingly and get a resolution and agreement to solve the issue. If you need my help then ping me. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:13, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I forgot to mentioned, you need to ping all the involved parties in the talk page, so they may know about the message you wrote on the article talk page.Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, CASSIOPEIA. I left everyone a talkback message. TheDoDahMan (talk) 11:40, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you need to "ping" them - (example for 3 users- double curly brackets, then PING, then pipe, then user name 1, then pipe, then username 2, then ping username 3, then double curly brackets). Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: I don't know where you are getting these edits from. I have checked and re-checked the history page of Stephane Graff] and I did NOT make the edit claimed. I only have 2 edits on 05 Jun 2019 (1549h,0316h) and NO edits on 06 Jun 2019. Please recheck the history and let me know what you find. Thanks in advance.TheDoDahMan (talk) 16:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) I think CASSIOPEIA is in a timezone 10 hours from UTC. If you deduct 10 hours from his times, you get these 4 edits: [2] [3] [4] [5]. I hope this helps. TwoTwoHello (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What the page stalker has is correct, 2 edits on 04 Jun and 2 edits on 05 Jun and NO edits on 06 Jun.TheDoDahMan (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TwoTwoHell Hi Thank you for clarifying and I should have provided the hist diff instead. Appreciate it.

Hi TheDoDahMan, I saw the conversation on Stephane Graff's talk page. As involved editors are sock except you and thanks to the intervention of Ivanvector, I am glad to know the case is closed. It might be a little stressful for you last few days to encounter such incident for a new editor, so take a good rest and let me know when you have done the CUVA assignment for me to review. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:03, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Hey!

Dear TheDoDahMan,

I think a misunderstanding has arisen regarding the Stephane Graff article. Attempts made to include reference to Graff's father are not intended, nor amount to, vandalism. I'm totally on your side in moderating the wiki for instances of vandalism. Graff's father, as stated in the supplied citations, is crucial to understanding Graff's privately funded exhibitions at private galleries. This is a fact of life in art criticism. It is important information when understanding the provenance of the artist's work.

Please message me if you would like to discuss this further.

Best wishes, Courbet 1866 Courbet1866 (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 15:48, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am humbled...TheDoDahMan (talk) 15:49, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WP:STiki!

Hello, TheDoDahMan, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Information about STiki, including:
- Using STiki and its hotkeys
- Comparison with other tools
Information about vandalism on Wikipedia

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 20:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Recent edit

Hello! I got a message about an edit made from my IP address (I didn't realise I wasn't logged in) to this article removing Thomas Thorne from the characters listed for BBC Ghosts. He's not an LGBT character and I was trying to remove it for being misleading. Really sorry for not leaving an explanation and I will make sure to do so in future edits. I'm still getting used to the editing process and this is the first time I've ever removed something from a page as opposed to adding to it.

Thank you and apologies again -Cyniques (talk) 10:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)Cyniques[reply]

Edit to Christopher Steele entry

My edit was deleted, which was clarifying that Orbis Business Intelligence, a firm co-founded by Steele, is a front for the Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine. This has been covered widely in The Independent, the Australian Financial Review, Vanity Fair and Business Insider. It is completely factual and unbiased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.205.90.69 (talk) 16:42, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit restored vandalism

Hi, I thought you should know, since you apparently weren't aware, that you restored vandalism in this edit. Please try to be more careful. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 06:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you! I will be more careful in futureTheDoDahMan (talk) 12:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CVUA - Your absent

Hi DoDahMan, I have sent a message to you on your CVUA page asking if you had finished the exercises and wanted me to review. However, you have not responded. Upon checking your contribution log, you last edit was on your CVUA page. Usually you would inform me if are not available to do the exercises. I hope you are well as you have abruptly stop editing . When you are back to Wikipedia and would like to continue your CVUA program, then pls ping me. All the best and take care. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Woodfibre LNG Terminal concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Woodfibre LNG Terminal, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Woodfibre LNG Terminal

Hello, TheDoDahMan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Woodfibre LNG Terminal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 07:01, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]