User talk:Tempaire

Image:Robbie1.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Robbie1.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – riana_dzasta 01:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Tempaire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- ReyBrujo 04:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BWR2.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:BWR2.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. -- ReyBrujo 04:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kotani Yasunori (Takenori) of the Yasukuni Shrine 1933-1945

An editor has nominated Kotani Yasunori (Takenori) of the Yasukuni Shrine 1933-1945, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotani Yasunori (Takenori) of the Yasukuni Shrine 1933-1945 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. cab 03:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide Japanese names for all individuals mentioned in the article and ISBN numbers for the sources you cite? Thanks, cab 03:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kotani Kenzo

Hi, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. You wrote to me about the name of this article. We have a guideline on Wikipedia, called WP:NCP. You might be interested in reading it. It says that the article title should be the name that is most generally recognisable, and that the title should not contain qualifiers (such as "King", "Saint", "Dr."). However, at the beginning of the article, the other guideline WP:MOSBIO says we should use the full name, if available.

According to these rules, I suggest that you move the article back to the simple name for the person, which is (I assume) "Kotani Kenzo". The qualifier "...of the Yasukuni Shrine" is not necessary for disambiguation, and the biographical dates 1909-2003 are not used in our article titles. If you do not do this, the article will stand out as odd and nonconforming among other articles, and that would be disrespectful, I think, to its subject. Thanks, Sandstein 04:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moves and move requests

It was brought to my attention that you recently moved the article Kenzō Kotani very soon after it was moved as the result of a move request. Wikipedia is founded upon the idea of consensus, and the move request is a means of establishing consensus for a given title, with regard to our naming conventions. While I'm sure you meant well, and that your conviction is heartfelt, current naming conventions and consensus strongly favour the title "Kenzō Kotani" over any more descriptive title, and moves which are clearly against consensus are liable to be seen as vandalism. Changes which are likely to be opposed by significant numbers of editors should always be discussed on talk pages in advance. Please do so. --Stemonitis 14:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles or before discussions about the title have ended, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A consensus has been reached, which you must abide by. --Stemonitis 06:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mars 11 had removed a source because I had written it. I would like to know why he has removed it and on what authority?

Tempaire 04:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Basil. W. Robinson of the Victoria and Albert Museum

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Basil. W. Robinson of the Victoria and Albert Museum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Agamemnon2 17:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Basil. W. Robinson

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Basil. W. Robinson. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.hennick.ca/bw.doc in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Basil. W. Robinson with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Basil. W. Robinson with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Basil. W. Robinson saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. Aarktica 21:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Kimotsuki Kanetake worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. | Uncle Milty | talk | 10:57, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Four Feathers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tempaire. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]