User talk:Techraj

Welcome!

Hello, Techraj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ism schism (talk) 20:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kanakangi

A tag has been placed on Kanakangi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 06:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carnatic music articles

It is nice to see lot of contribution to Carnatic music articles. I hope we can fill in the big gaps in Wikipedia related to Indian music as a whole.

I have a few comments and/or suggestions, related to some of your edits.

Words ending in "a" need not be changed to ā. The default pronounciation is the elongated a, as in Asia, Canada, Alaska, camera, data, flora, fauna, etc. Hence Rasikapriya can stay instead of Rasikapriyā.
Related to that, I noticed that links got disconnected when you made such changes too. For example, we have Rasikapriya but not Rasikapriyā article and we have Graha bedham and not Graha bédham. I request you to preview your changes before saving the page, in order to avoid these de-link actions.
Please take time to identify links and link them, especially when using Diacritical marks. There exists Alapana but no ālapanā - so we can do the wiki as "[[Alapana|ālapanā]]s" to get ālapanās.
Adding links for smaller terms like nishadham, shadjam may not be worth it - may be best to link to swara page, (for which there is likely to be a link in Structure and Lakshana anyway).
Also, Kalyana vasantham is not the normal spelling (in the highly used convention here) - it is Kalyana vasantam. T for tha sound, as in Enakku ta (give me). ṭ is used for Naṭabhairavi. Please note that individual editors have used different conventions and hence the varying spellings in lot of articles.

With respect to Kharaharapriya edits, I have couple of queries.

You mentioned This is one of the few rāgams that allows for a composition to start and end on the nishādam; usually shadjam and panchamam are the swaras chosen for this purpose. I do not believe that any ragam allows or does not allow. Composers decide based on what they are inspired on. Hence in other ragams also there are some songs that start with Ni. Also, there are songs that start with Ga, Ma, Pa and Dha too. Especially, some composers have chosen to start some of the compositions in the same akshara as pallavi. Can that line be removed from the article, as I feel it incorrect and misleading?
Another quote Kharaharapriya songs are usually meant to be sung medium or medium-fast, . . . I do not believe so. Many of Kharaharapriya songs are sung at slow tempo to bring out the karuna rasa. Would you agree?
Wikifying names before creating the articles - in my opinion having lot of red links is not looking good. We can change names to links later, after articles are created. The names of many ragams in this page are in red link (no article has yet been created for them). That is the reason on many ragam pages I prefer to leave names in italics without links, until we later add the other ragam articles. Having more than 400 ragams means it is going to take time and hence we can reduce red links in articles. Would you agree?

These are a few of my view points related to improving Indian music content at Wikipedia. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 08:21, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions, comments, and bringing some of the unnoticed errors up.

I agree that the ā sound need not be used in all situations. I will correct the Janya ragas page suitably.
Good points on adding alternate pronunciation, fewer links to the "swara" pages. I will follow these henceforth.
Spelling conventions really need to be laid out better, and I agree there. Any suggestions on whether we can use the ITRANS or the IAST systems to standardize English representations of Indian languages? I believe that IAST, although more accurate is rather more cumbersome to edit and maintain, and may also be difficult to read, for the uninitiated.
I read of the trait of Kharaharapriya to start/end on the nishadam on an article on Carnatica 1, whose author explains, "Kharaharapriya is a tristhAyI rAgam. Compositions in kharaharapriya usually begin in sa, ri, pa ,ni." If you believe that this source is inaccurate, by all means, let us correct it.
Indeed, Chakkani Rajamargamu seems to start on a slow or slow-medium note. It would be valid to include this too. I agree.
Good point about Wikifying names. The issue I have faced is that when creating article stubs, robots usually mark articles for deletion when not fully formed. Can you suggest a solution, please?

I want to let you know that I really appreciate your work on contributing to Carnatic music (in particular) on Wikipedia. I hope to learn more and contribute more to these articles on Indian music.

tech 14:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Nice to get a very quick reply. I am glad to get some more people collaborating on the Indian Music project.

For point 3 above, I have used IAST where required, if you look into the appropriate pages. In fact, even for Arohana and Avarohana on every ragam page I have used it. The way I get around cumbersome is to have a small file that has all the letters and strings in a text file that I just copy and paste from. And, since I contribute a small bit to Tamil Wikipedia also, such quick ref type prepared text helps me zip through quickly. If someone has better ideas great.

TristhAyI, to my knowledge means that the ragam sounds good in all 3 sthAyIs - i.e., mandra sthAyI, madhyama sthAyI and tara sthAyI (lower, middle and higher octaves). Regarding the point on Nishadham - it can be reworded if the information can be confirmed from another source as well. I will keep looking too. Basically I am objecting to ragam allows - it is not the ragam allowing, in my opinion. If we do not find another source that corraborates, we can drop it.

Another point about Wikipedia is weasel words (see WP:WEASEL). For example, the word Usually does not give a good feel for the % of compositions. Hence, we can drop them and reword accordingly, even if the source has such statements.

When creating articles, work in the sandbox. I also faced the same situation. You can see User:VasuVR/Carnatic music terminology that admin created by moving the Carnatic music terminology when I had just 2 terms and a lot of TODO mentioned. Look into the history of edits and you will see what they do. That also gives a clue - create the articles like, for example, User:Techraj/Sindu Bhairavi - no one will delete it. When it is decently formed, then copy it to Sindu Bhairavi.

Hope these help and let us continue to keep rolling. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 17:26, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gamaka

Hi, Please note that Gamakam/Gamak are different from what Gamaka article talks about. Disambiguation is the way. Do not merge Gamakam and Gamaka. Gamakam is a musical term while Gamaka is a genre of music in Karnataka.

~rAGU (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kweezzz was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! My76 Strat 04:47, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Techraj,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kweezzz concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kweezzz, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Kweezzz

Hello Techraj. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Kweezzz.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kweezzz}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]