User talk:Tanapot2001

License tagging for File:Like I Would (The Remixes) cover.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Like I Would (The Remixes) cover.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Like I Would (The Remixes)

A tag has been placed on Like I Would (The Remixes) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unecessary. Pages for Remix EPs don't go with the manual of style

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aaron's The Best (talk) 06:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Like I Would (The Remixes) cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Like I Would (The Remixes) cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Tanapot2001, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Mind of Mine seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ... richi (hello) 20:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Drake-Too-Good-2016.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Drake-Too-Good-2016.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Drake-Controlla-2016.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Drake-Controlla-2016.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:JustinBieber-LoveYourself.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JustinBieber-LoveYourself.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Truth (Zayn song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:31, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Tanapot2001/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Tanapot2001/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JustinBieber-LoveYourself.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JustinBieber-LoveYourself.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Still Got Time

The article Still Got Time has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only an infobox. No text. Does not satisfy musical notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Still Got Time, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Ss 112 12:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Passionfruit (Drake song). Ss 112 14:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Amortias (T)(C) 20:21, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jorja Smith

Thank you for your edits on the page I started for Jorja Smith. Someone has put a deletion notice on the page, using incorrect gender pronouns and saying the artist has received no press outside her hometown. I would be grateful if you could look at the request and give a response as to whether you disagree with the deletion request or not. Thank you. Jwslubbock (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To the Max

In future, do not restore articles that have been redirected for failing WP:NSONGS unless you add something of note to the page. You restored content on To the Max mere hours later. In future, you will be reverted for doing this. At the time, it did not pass WP:NSONGS as it had not charted. Contrary to popular belief, not every song warrants an article. Ss 112 15:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Signs (Drake song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Signs (Drake song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. T147AG 09:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Drake song article edits

Please don't add an exclamation mark to bold entries in the singles template. This makes all entries show as bold text, and this is unsightly and incorrect. It should either say ! scope="row" or be left as is. Thank you. Ss 112 13:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You did the same thing at The Show (Lenka song). Don't bold entries please. It is not standard formatting. Ss 112 06:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Gyalchester.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ss 112 17:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gyalchester. Stop removing content without explanation, or you will be reported. Ss 112 07:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add the French streaming if a song made the overall singles chart there. Ss 112 17:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Tomlinson. Ss 112 04:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've been reported for disruptive editing. You have never replied to any of these warnings, and you don't seem to understand the concept of staying reverted once you have been and not restoring your changes. See WP:BOLD. Ss 112 18:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for KMT (song)

On 27 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KMT (song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Drake's song "KMT" sampled the theme "His World" from the 2006 video game Sonic the Hedgehog? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KMT (song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, KMT (song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for continued removal of material, as you did at She (Zayn song). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Kendrick Lamar discography.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Tanapot, you just came from being unblocked, and now you appear to be using an IP address in tandem with your account to pass your edits through. This is sockpuppetry and could you get blocked again. The reference "SWEHeatseeker" isn't defined on the page, and you're adding a certification column without anything in it. Ss 112 13:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Your disruptive behavior has continued despite repeated warnings and blocks. Enough. If you can avoid trying to evade your block, in six months you may post an unblock request per WP:SO and we will have a conversation. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the history of User:Tanapot2001/sandbox for nonstop IP editing. Meters (talk) 04:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of She (Zayn song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article She (Zayn song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/She (Zayn song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]