User talk:StormCommander

Archives

Archive 1

Leave me a message. :)

Your user page

I went ahead and moved your old user page to your new one, and moved the history of your user talk page here and archived it for you. Happy editing! --Core desat 21:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!--StormCommander 22:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Nintendo Page Redesign

A new page design is being considered for the WikiProject Nintendo page. A rough draft can be viewed here. Please add all comments and thoughts to the discussion. From the automated, Anibot 22:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

you even use wiki anymore? :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miles Blues (talk • contribs) 00:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Gary E. Johnson‎, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dori (Talk • Contribs) 01:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BJ Lawson

Proposed deletion of B.J. Lawson

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article B.J. Lawson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non notable person whose only claim to fame is that he ran for Congress and was unsuccessful. His campaign seems to have been a run of the mill affair without any real controversy. The article appears to have been written to support candidacy

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Albatross2147 (talk) 23:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, StormCommander. You have new messages at Smallman12q's talk page.
Message added 00:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Smallman12q (talk) 00:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, StormCommander. You have new messages at Talk:Peter Schiff.
Message added 14:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Smallman12q (talk) 14:01, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption at Schiff article

As you refuse to discuss your reasonings for deletion (at least, not discussed outside of a few inscrutable edit comments referring to some "belittling" of Schiff), the deletion of the cited+neutral+relevant text is disruptive and not tolerable. BigK HeX (talk) 14:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I could get a citation for anything. I could call him crazy or stupid and cite a website that has those opinions. Just because you can cite something doesn't mean it is fitting for objective/neutral Wikipedia articles. First you find a citation to call him "nonprofessional." Then when the other editors disagree with your addition of the label, you try from another angle and call him "non-mainstream." What's next? Maybe "nonsane" or "nonsmart" or "nonlikeable?" Maybe next you'll label him as "just anotta wanna dos Jews trying to hyjack our country" and cite the stormfront website. You see, just because you cite something doesn't mean it is appropriate for the article. --StormCommander (talk) 18:59, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Old Testament

This explains what vandalism is. Your definition does not appear to correspond to what other editors use. Please don't assume something that doesn't agree with your viewpoint is immediately vandalism. Feel free to discuss this on the article's talk page. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Then what is the word for editing false information into the article? It's assumed false until sourced. We can't be adding information to articles and leaving it there without citation. See Burden of evidence --StormCommander (talk) 20:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zathyus Networks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zathyus Networks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zathyus Networks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 19:57, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]