Jump to content

User talk:Stoptheprop

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Stoptheprop! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Mikhail Gorbachev, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. If you have questions, please contact me or ask at the Arbitration Committee Clerks Noticeboard. Mellk (talk) 10:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note

[edit]

Please note that due to WP:RUSUKR, editors who are not extended confirmed are unable to make edits about the Russo-Ukrainian war, broadly construed, but it is still possible to make constructive edit requests on the talk page. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 10:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stoptheprop, please explain how specifically your edits to Talk:Russians at War and to User talk:Daniel Case were not in violation of the above restrictions. I expect you to answer this prior to editing any further in that broadly construed subject area. --Yamla (talk) 21:59, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
er, because we're allowed to make constructive edit requests on talk pages. Explain how it was a violation please. Stoptheprop (talk) 22:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not once have you made an edit request, as far as I can see. See Wikipedia:Edit requests. An edit request isn't for requesting that users be blocked. You'd be free to file a case at WP:SPI, but doing so on the talk page is not appropriate. Edits such as this and this aren't remotely an edit request. Please restrict yourself to Wikipedia:Edit requests on that talk page. --Yamla (talk) 22:12, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did file a case. The case concluded the accounts were indeed sockpuppets. Hence request on Daniel's talk page to revert the page to a version not written by sockpuppets. Stoptheprop (talk) 22:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see you did file an WP:SPI and indeed, caught socks. I sincerely appreciate your effort doing that. --Yamla (talk) 22:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thank you. Can we restore the legitimate version of the page now? Stoptheprop (talk) 22:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
this is the version I would like restored:
https://en.m.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?oldid=1247878515&title=Russians_at_War Stoptheprop (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stoptheprop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

alternative accounts are allowed to avoid harassment and I wasn't astroturfing support unlike other bad actors, rather just switching accounts when presence of trolls became clear

Decline reason:

As per below. WP:SOCK notes, "Contributing to the same page or discussion with multiple accounts: Editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests they are multiple people. Contributing to the same page with clearly linked, legitimate, alternative accounts (e.g. editing the same page with your main and public computer account or editing a page using your main account that your bot account edited) is not forbidden.". Yamla (talk) 21:00, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were editing the same talk page with both accounts. That alone is sanctionable. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That seems unfair, I wasn't trying to create an illusion unlike the others who kept writing that they agreed with themselves. Stoptheprop (talk) 20:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You clearly did exactly that. See for example, Talk:Russians_at_War#Toronto_police_said_they_made_no_safety_recommendations where you used one account to support the arguments of the other. --Yamla (talk) 21:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
that was simply a case of forgetting to switch, I fully intended to use this account to deal with the page one it became clear it was being inundated with trolls Stoptheprop (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stoptheprop&oldid=1258045376"