User talk:Still-Jim

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Still-Jim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Um, not sure why my accoutn has been blocked. This is mine but the other one, marlin, is my dad. Thought someone hacked my wifi till I asked. That and check the history, I was not editing the same thing he was. So not sure why you think we were cross editing socks? Still-Jim (talk) 23:46, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It seems pretty clear from the SPI that you were found to be using the same IP, which your above comment doesn't dispute. And I am willing to accept, on other grounds, that there are two different people behind the respective keyboards. But the policy applies just as clearly to meatpuppeting as well as sockpuppeting, and as noted at the SPI it did seem rather suspicious that a brand new account on the same one as one that hadn't been used in two years both started editing an article at the center of a major real-life controversy, in similar ways. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.