User talk:Stick lizard 2

May 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to BBC Choice— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boing (Turkey)

Hello Stick lizard 2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Boing (Turkey) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 16:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm LindsayH. An edit that you recently made to BBC Choice seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! cheers, Lindsay^Hello 09:18, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Warner Bros. Animation with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 09:45, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at BBC Choice, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: BBC Choice was changed by Stick lizard 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887019 on 2016-06-04T10:25:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at GameCube.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: GameCube was changed by Stick lizard 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974528 on 2016-06-04T16:46:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 17:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to CBeebies may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| replaced names = CBBC On Choice (Merged with CBBC Rebrand) (As part of [[BBC Choice]]<br>[[BBC Knowledge]]
/>[[BBC News (TV channel)|BBC News]]<br />[[BBC Parliament]]<br />[[CBBC (TV channel)|CBBC]]<br />[[BBC Choice

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:36, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Airside Retail Park has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Airside Retail Park was changed by Stick lizard 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864107 on 2016-06-06T21:24:31+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reid furniture

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reid furniture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to GameCube has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: GameCube was changed by Stick lizard 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904535 on 2016-06-09T16:48:25+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reid furniture

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reid furniture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 19:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Suggestion

Hi Stick lizard 2. You have ordered and requested several times that i and others stop editing your pages. There is a small problem with that, in that you do not own any pages here, in fact, once you press the SAVE button you are explicitly ending all claim you have to owning whatever you have written. There are a lot of things to learn, here at Wikipedia, and i'd really like to suggest you spend a little time trying to learn some of them. To that end, to help you, i'll put a welcome template on this page in a moment; it has a lot of links on it which i believe would repay your attention. If i can help you in any way, please ask, here (i watch this page) or on my talk page. If, however, you try and order me around, as you did that last time you visited my talk page, i will not be willing to help. Thanks. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 19:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Stick lizard 2! Thank you for your contributions. I am LindsayH and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 19:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pop Girl. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pop Girl was changed by Stick lizard 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91431 on 2016-06-10T20:47:22+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aardman Animations, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Aardman Animations was changed by Stick lizard 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947623 on 2016-06-11T14:30:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Xbox games compatible with Xbox 360.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: List of Xbox games compatible with Xbox 360 was changed by Stick lizard 2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908487 on 2016-06-12T16:07:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

3Kids

Unsourced.Xx236 (talk) 13:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 3Kids

The article 3Kids has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable programming block, unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:07, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 3Kids for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3Kids is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3Kids until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 14:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

Hi Stick lizard 2. I'm sorry, i really am, but i'm having to revert you again, this time at List of television stations in the United Kingdom, where you have broken the formatting of wikilinks, and again put in the addition of BBC3, which i'm pretty sure i've either removed myself or seen someone else remove after you have added it places. Please, please, take a look at some of the links in the welcome message i put on this page a few days ago, a few lines up. There is so much you could do here, but i'm afraid that you will end up getting yourself blocked (which i believe has already happened once) if you continue down the path you seem to be intent on. Experiment, for sure, in the right place. Learn how to edit. Learn how this place works. And definitely understand that we are a collaborative community, and you must do things the way we do them. I'm afraid, now, i'm going to go look at others of your contributions, and i may have to revert you there; if i do, i may well not let you know, as i don't want to be a nagging voice on this page. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 14:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silgo Retail Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Costa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grounded videos

The article Grounded videos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, potentially fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FallingGravity (talk) 04:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Grounded videos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grounded videos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grounded videos until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 19:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BBC Choice

Hello Stick lizard 2. I'm afraid i have reverted one of your edits again: When you took out the phrase "of Parliament" in BBC Choice, what you left did not make proper sense ("the other proposals gained the approval and the new channels went on air" has some meaning lost), so i have put back the needed phrase. I'm so glad you are so eager to help, but i am rather concerned that you don't really seem to know what your doing, but are merely trying different edits to see what can be done. I'm pretty sure that the sandpit play area has been pointed out to you, possibly by me earlier on this page; i urge you to make your tests there, or in your own at User:Stick lizard 2/sandbox, where you can try things out to your heart's content, and see if the grammar and flow of language is correct, and the formatting is right, without damaging the encyclopaedia. As always, feel free to ask if you need any help ~ though the demands on my talk page may not be the best way to get it! Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 08:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reid Furniture

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reid Furniture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 14:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wii Sports Resort have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 18:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clarehall Retail Park

Hello, Stick lizard 2. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Clarehall Retail Park, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. noq (talk) 12:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silgo Retail Park

The article Silgo Retail Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of meeting notability guidelines. Google searches not finding any significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 12:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Stick lizard 2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Stick lizard 2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 3Kids for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3Kids is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3Kids (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 04:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]