Jump to content

User talk:Softwarestatistik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Softwarestatistik, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Legend Stars (November 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Softwarestatistik! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Jawa Timur Park. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:11, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Legend Star moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, The Legend Star, has no sources and cannot remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Legend Star for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Legend Star is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Legend Star until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

[edit]

Discretionary sanctions for the Arab-Israeli dispute area

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 20:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You must follow these page-specific restrictions until you have 500 edits and have been here 30 days

[edit]

For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing

  1. the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and
  2. edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces with the exception of userspace ("related content")

Also,

500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.

The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:

1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.

2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required. Doug Weller talk 20:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC) 3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.[reply]

Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Doug Weller talk 20:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Legend Stars

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Softwarestatistik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Legend Stars, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Legend Stars

[edit]

Hello, Softwarestatistik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Legend Stars".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:07, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Indonesia–Palestine relations, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop WP:SPAMMMING these templates everywhere!

[edit]

Johnbod (talk) 16:09, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bible translations into Arabic into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. eviolite (talk) 01:49, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COMMUNICATE

[edit]

I noticed that you have no edits on your User talk page at all. Wikipedia's core principle of consensus requires discussion among editors on WP:TALK pages. You should collaborate with other editors by responding here on your Talk page when other editors address you here (see sections above), or at article talk pages whenever content issues arise concerning you at an article. Please go to Template talk:Christianity sidebar where I have proposed a rollback of your last sixty edits at the template, and respond. I could just go ahead and do it anyway based on WP:BRD, but I thought I'd wait a bit and give you some time to respond, first. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 08:57, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking any response from you at the template talk page, the rollback has been carried out. You can still come to the Talk page and discuss your changes. Mathglot (talk) 17:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 09:10, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Softwarestatistik! Your additions to Arab Christians have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 08:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 07:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[[1]] Norfolkbigfish (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for lack of responsiveness to warnings, no use of talk pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 08:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can be unblocked by agreeing to respond to the above ANI message and agreeing to use talk pages going forward, including of course your own. Doug Weller talk 08:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

You must either never repeat your contested edits at the templates you have been editing, or you must respond at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Christianity Side-boxes and wait for a conclusion from that discussion before continuing similar changes. Otherwise, you will be indefinitely blocked. Johnuniq (talk) 08:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Softwarestatistik: There was no response at the archived ANI discussion. After a two-week break you have resumed editing. If you are unable or unwilling to respond effectively in English you should not repeat contested edits. You will be indefinitely blocked if disruption occurs. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 23:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries redux

[edit]

@Softwarestatistik:, in the section above, I left you a detailed description of Edit summaries, how to use them, and why it's a good idea to do so. It seems you haven't yet applied this advice.

In particular, in these edits at Template:Christianity sidebar you added links to the sidebar, without giving any reason for it. Lack of collaboration and interaction has been a problem for you in the past. Please use an edit summary with every edit, explaining how they were an improvement to the article or project page.

I recently congratulated you at Template talk:Christianity sidebar for making your first ever Talk page comment. Please keep it up, and continue to engage at Talk pages to find consensus with other editors. Please also get in the habit of including an edit summary with every edit to engage your fellow editors and keep them apprised of your intentions and reasoning. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Jesus Buntu Burake, Makale.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jesus Buntu Burake, Makale.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the image, because it appears to have been copied from this webpage or elsewhere online. Please don't copy images or text from other websites. — Diannaa (talk) 17:49, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Surakarta has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 06:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DanCherek, can you have a look at Talk:Batu, East Java#Possible copyvio? Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries yet again

[edit]

Softwarestatistik, I notice that despite the notices about using edit summaries here, and here, in your last 70 edits over a day and a half, you haven't used an edit summary once. Please include an edit summary with every edit, it helps other editors know what the intent behind your change is. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability, sourcing, and original research

[edit]

Hello again, Softwarestatistik, Wikipedia's WP:Verifiability policy calls for all material at Wikipedia to be verifiable. It says:

The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution.

Simply adding your own experiences and opinions about local culture or cuisine in Indonesia as you did at a number of articles is contrary to Wikipedia's policy of WP:No original research. Unfortunately, all or nearly all of your recent edits seem to fall into that category. Consequently, I have undone your edits at the following articles:

You're welcome to re-add the material again, which you can still find in the revision history of the respective articles, just please be sure to include a citation with them when you add the material back in. Some of the edits were very large ones, and may require multiple citations to cover all the ground. Feel free to copy and paste either of these models for use as citations:

  • <ref>{{cite web |author= |title= |url= |date= |website= |access-date={{subst:TIME}} }}</ref>
  • <ref>{{cite book |author= |title= |url= |date= |page= |publisher= |isbn= |access-date={{subst:TIME}} }}</ref>

You can find many more types of citations for journals, newspapers, and so on listed at {{citation}}.

Besides this specific issue, I feel I should tell you as a friendly piece of advice, that you may be in danger of a block. There are a number of issues that you have been advised about, some several times. Your responses here have been minimal, and there doesn't seem to be any sign that you have addressed any of these issues so far. I'm not an admin, so I can't block you, but as an experienced editor here, I feel you are edging closer and closer to a block, which may come at any moment. The hour is late, but I believe it may still be in your power to stop this from happening, and the very first thing you need to do is to respond to this message as soon as possible, let me know you have read it, understand it, and plan to take certain measures to improve your editing. Please respond with your concrete plans about how you plan to address the issues raised on this page by other editors. I believe this is your best course of action now if you wish to continue editing here.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me below with a {{Reply}} message, or on my Talk page. You can also get answers from the WP:Tea house, or the WP:Help desk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Blenduk Church, Semarang.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 05:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Christians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Pbritti (talk) 15:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You have done this across multiple articles. Please use sources appropriately. ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Gereja Bethany Indonesia.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Gereja Bethany Indonesia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ngurah Rai International Airport. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 06:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparison of Indonesian and Standard Malay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cancel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tambourine. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Please note that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. A few examples showing the differences in the article would be fine, but you should post the others on Wiktionary instead. Additionally, articles containing more than 9,000 words are already considered long, while the article was sitting at a whopping 32,768 word count. You are advised to discuss this before reverting. WP:COMMUNICATION is required on a collaborative project. NM 02:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This draft lacks a proper lede sentence stating what the subject and topic are. Articles other than list articles should not consist primarily of very long lists. See Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 04:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Jonah, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In most cases we do not link country names. Please read MOS:OVERLINK. CodeTalker (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Indonesian and Malaysian Malay Vocabulary (February 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:
Same problems as before. Also too long.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:05, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a dictionary

[edit]

Please note that Wikipedia is not a dictionary. A few examples showing the differences in the article would be fine, but you should post the others on Wiktionary instead. Additionally, articles containing more than 9,000 words are already considered long, while the article was sitting at a whopping 32,768 word count. NM 03:12, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NM 04:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent copyrights infringements and for a seeming total absence of communication, which is required (warned many times and blocked previously over this).
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  El_C 04:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Softwarestatistik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry in advance, I added a new article to one of the article pages and then edited it repeatedly from the existing one. Is there a way to create a new article page? or how? Softwarestatistik (talk) 02:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Before you worry about creating new articles, you need to address the reasons for the block, copyright violations and a lack of communication. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Indonesian and Malaysian Malay Vocabulary

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Softwarestatistik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Indonesian and Malaysian Malay Vocabulary, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Indonesian and Malaysian Malay Vocabulary

[edit]

Hello, Softwarestatistik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Indonesian and Malaysian Malay Vocabulary".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Softwarestatistik&oldid=1240710392"