User talk:Smason1022

Welcome!

Hello, Smason1022, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ruby Murray 11:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Betty Tompkins

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Betty Tompkins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. smileguy91^talk 03:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Betty Tompkins, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington, Oberlin and Paterson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Tompkins painting

Hi Smason1022. Thank you very much for starting the article on Betty Tompkins. I think that the image of her painting that you uploaded (File:Online-BT 1 f-painting-300x418.jpg) may not be in the public domain. You marked the image as "PD-ineligible", but I haven't seen any evidence that Tompkins released any of her works into the public domain.

If it is a copyrighted image, we may be able to still keep it in the article as fair use. The image would have to be uploaded locally on English Wikipedia and would require a non-free use rationale and maybe some additional text describing the work or the series in the article. Let me know if I can help. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 02:48, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for sending me the message regarding Betty Tompkins' painting. I wasn't quite sure how to categorize the image permission for that painting. I spoke with her today and she was perfectly satisfied having this image (on the Wiki page, itself) present in the public domain. Since it is held in the collection of a public institution, The Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris, Betty is satisfied with having the image be on the page in its current form without additional licensing. Please let me know how best to cite the image permissions, forthwith. I am still learning how to properly code here! I am also a contributor for the entry for Xaviera Simmons (another female contemporary artist), so all tips and suggestions are most welcome. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smason1022 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unless Tompkins has agreed to release all of her rights to the image (including allowing commercial use of the image without attribution), the image should not be marked as being in the public domain. If she does want that, documentation of her permission will need to be received through OTRS. Commons (where you uploaded the file) is intended for free images only and not those where the artist wants to retain certain rights. See File:Chinese Souls No. 2 (Nancy Crow).jpg for an example of an image that is not in the public domain but still meets Wikipedia's requirements for non-free images. You can see that the image has a fair use rationale for the articles where it is used. Non-free images can be uploaded on the English Wikipedia if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 08:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm BZTMPS. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Betty Tompkins with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BZTMPS ★ · (talk? contribs?) 16:46, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Smason1022. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]