User talk:SlovonManob

Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Trial of 6ix9ine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Materialscientist (talk) 12:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SlovonManob, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi SlovonManob! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Alex Hurteau. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 14:00, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ale Jithendra

The article Ale Jithendra has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —teb728 t c 17:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ale Jithendra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ale Jithendra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Natureium (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kodak Black, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to 6ix9ine

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 6ix9ine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Multiple editors have reverted your addition of the word "Notable" to the "Feuds" section header. A discussion has been opened on the article's talk page regarding this. As has been pointed out, the word "Notable" is subjective and prone to a given user's own conclusions. Please do not add the word "Notable" to this section heading again without a consensus for such being reached on the talk page. Thanks! Strikerforce^Talk 15:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on David Barksdale. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I’m sorry, it was in good faith. Please don’t block my verifiability. SlovonManob (talk) 01:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SlovonManob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been wrongly blocked on the grounds that my username is inappropriate, which is dumbfounding to say the least. My two middle names are Shravan and Manav and I've recently learned in the Bengali language that A's are pronounced as O's as well as V's into B's, so I thought a clever way to alter my identity would do something along those lines. I accidentally typed an L instead of an H and left out the R as it appears now too. If the Wikipedia community is so offended by my username I would like to just change it to something completely different so as to not offend anyone. Please and thank you.

Decline reason:

Technical decline as a duplicate, see reason in second unblock request below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Well, as you are amenable to renaming, please choose a new name. Copy the following block of text and replace "new username" with the new username of your choice. {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}. If you ping me, i can rename you if I'm online. Thanks -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @ Dlohcierekim can you officiate my name change please and thank you.

Dlohcierekim (talk)

Hey @ Dlohcierekim Could you rename me to my new username please and thank you.SlovonManob (talk) 01:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SlovonManob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

J. Kaushiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I would like this to be my new username. I’m 100% positive there is nothing obscene about this. If you would like me to provide an explanation so that it meets Wikipedia’s standards I’d be happy to.

Decline reason:

There is already a User:J-Kaushiki created just after this account was blocked (and now blocked for an unrelated reason), and that looks suspiciously like you. Also, please explain your connection with User:J. Papaharini (previously User:ItsSugmaDique). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/J. Papaharini, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

— Newslinger talk 23:52, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ale Jithendra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ale Jithendra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ale Jithendra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]