User talk:Skatergirl0709

The Leningrad Symphony is rather strange, seeing as how it was not written for the Siege of Leningrad, but rather the one that "Stalin destroyed and Hitler merely finished off." It was first performed in August 1941 by people who were in very unhealthy conditions. The conductor himself could barely stand up, much less wave a baton.Skatergirl0709 (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

Hey, this isn't so much a general resource for getting questions answered, it's really a place for people to submit new articles. The "decline" here isn't that I'm declining to answer your question, it's just that this question isn't an article.

A Wikipedia sandbox -- and each editor here has one, is a place for them to take a few notes, put together a draft article before actually submitting it for inclusion, and so on. It's just a temporary space that one can work in.

I'll leave a note on your talk page to the Teahouse--consider asking questions like that there. They are a fantastic group of editors who have a lot of experience explaining Wikipedia's sometimes-confusing processes to new editors, they're a great group of folks, and a great resource if you have additional questions. Hope this helps!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Skatergirl0709/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 03:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Skatergirl0709, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe decker ^talk 03:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment they left was:

This appears to be either a test edit that has been submitted as a draft article by mistake, or a note by the creator to herself that was not meant to be a draft article. If you don't understand why this is not a draft article and why its submission as a draft article is disruptive, ask for advice at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Skatergirl0709/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Skatergirl0709/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 03:23, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment they left was:

This still appears to be a test edit, or a note from the author to herself. The author has been previously advised not to resubmit this in its current form. This repeated submission of a test edit (and which will probably always only be a note to self, not a neutral encyclopedic article) is tendentious. If you don't know what is and is not a submission or a test edit, ask for advice at the Teahouse. Further resubmission may result in a block.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Skatergirl0709/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Skatergirl0709/sandbox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. The continuing resubmission of a sandbox that is not an article draft, after repeated declines, is tendentious. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]