User talk:Sirsentence
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Sirsentence, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Low Country Sounds, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Low Country Sounds
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Low Country Sounds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rival Sons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buchanan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
I don't know if you noticed but before you created RCA Studio A, I had already been working on a draft at Draft:RCA Studio A. I tagged the page you created with the {{inuse}}-template. Please do not eddit it until I remove it again so I can merge both versions. Thank you! Regards SoWhy 15:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
OK. Sorry I did not notice your draft, only noticed there was absolutely no page to an extremely historical site. I will halt editing it, until you can incorporate your draft into it. Perhaps we can collaborate on its efforts once done. Thank you!Sirsentence (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- No problem. I started the draft because of your Low Country Sound article. I merged all the content now and added a number of references, so feel free to edit again. Btw, if you manage to get your first article over 1500 characters in the next 2 days, we could get both of them on the Main Page via Wikipedia:Did you know. Ping me if you are interested. Regards SoWhy 15:51, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
Wonderful. I am definitely interested. I will continue to edit Low Country Sound to meet specifications. So ping!(Hope I did that right.) Sirsentence (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Good, good. I will try to check tomorrow. Pinging works by linking to another user's page using wikilinks (
[[ ]]
). You can either write[[User:SoWhy|SoWhy]]
to ping me or use the templates {{u}} or {{re}} (i.e.{{u|SoWhy}}
or{{re|SoWhy}}
). I have added both articles and your talk page to my Watchlist but with 6000+ pages, I might not see messages without a ping.Regards SoWhy 16:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
SoWhy Went ahead and finished some more editing to Low Country Sound. According to the toolbar https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wiki.x.io/Low%20Country%20Sound, it currently has 1,534 characters thus qualifying it. Let me know. Thanks again for your outstanding help!Sirsentence (talk) 16:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- According to the DYKCheck-tool most people use for it, it has 1779 characters, so good work. However, the layout needs some work and information on the building(s) probably should be kept in their articles. I'll do a little cleaning and then check about a DYK nomination. Regards SoWhy 17:23, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry for the interference, I will tag the page with inuse again when I plan major edits. While your work is quite good, it needs some polishing to meet the requirements for neutrality and style. Regards SoWhy 17:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
SoWhy Ok, wonderful. Feel free to adjust as you see fit on the Low Country Sound article as I am still familiarizing myself with the boilerplate specifications of articles. Thank you for the links to the wiki guidelines! Also I want you to be aware, I noticed two repetitive paragraphs from your revisions and edits in RCA Studio A, I have to take care of off line biz, so I won’t have time right at moment to adjust, bu I will asap if you cannot get to it right now. Once again, many many thanks. You’re awesome! Sirsentence (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Nobody owns any article, so don't worry about editing anything. I would advise though that you place {{inuse}} on the page before you start an editing session to avoid edit conflicts. Btw, I started the nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Low Country Sound and RCA Studio A. If you have an idea how to create a catchy "hook" (question that starts with "did you know that..." and generates interest in both articles, feel free to comment there. I'll do the necessary review work later and we have to wait for someone else to review it anyway. Regards SoWhy 18:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
SoWhy Oh! I understand that. Wikipedia is strictly a collaborative public effort. Tip duly noted. I went ahead and updated those articles and also added two more “Did you know...” questions. I can probably come up with some more, but I think the Chris Stapleton one is pretty decent. Either or, feel free to ping me or let me know if we can do more for it or if you need anything. I appreciate your help you’ve given. Sincerely, Sirsentence (talk) 22:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
1) The Tennessee WikiProject may be interesting to you. (I've added the article to that).
2) There is only one source author provided, The Tennessean. Do you have sources from another author that speak of the Music Industry Coalition?
--Gryllida (talk) 01:19, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Gryllida Ahh thank you for that. As for additional linkage that is differential from the newspaper citation, absolutely! In fact I am about to add the others right now and put a heavy work tag on. I just wanted to ensure I got the “cream of the crop” reference first. Those source articles are rather extensive. Thanks! Anything you need, let me know!! Best, Sirsentence (talk) 01:27, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Low Country Sound Logo.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Low Country Sound Logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Carnival Music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Adam Wright
- Owen Bradley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bob Ferguson
- Rival Sons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Thomas Flowers
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Low Country Sound
[edit]On 2 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Low Country Sound, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Low Country Sound operates out of historic RCA Studio A in Nashville, Tennessee? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Low Country Sound), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
DYK for RCA Studio A
[edit]On 2 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article RCA Studio A, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Low Country Sound operates out of historic RCA Studio A in Nashville, Tennessee? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, RCA Studio A), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Rival Sons
[edit]Where to start, where to start? Let's see, first you prematurely thrown a 3RR warning on my page, when I've only made one revert today. Then, you tell me I need to take it to the talk page...when I've already done that OVER A MONTH AGO. You, my friend, are the one who has refused to engage on the talk page. I'd be mad about this if I wasn't laughing so hard about it. In any event, if you want to make a reasonable defense of your inclusions, please do so on the talk page. Mystic Technocrat (talk) 20:15, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Mystic Technocrat (talk) 17:50, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Multiple times I have tried to compromise with you and each time you rudely dismiss and delete relevant contributions backed in the citations. You originally were conducting an edit war within the article for Rival Sons and rudely demanding no more edits. You failed to read the citations before deleting to verify or discredit the already present info on associated acts. This is evident by you deleting Veruca Salt multiple times and rudely declaring my edits “100 percent wrong.” This latest attempt by you to label me in as an “edit warrior” is just abuse of the Wikipedia guidelines and you taking the revisions of your deletions personal. I don’t see how anyone can reasonably debate article changes when you fail to even read the info already available that counters your claims. This highly seems like unnecessary actions for such rash, ill informed conclusions. Sirsentence (talk) 22:17, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I would like to add a note for all whom read this incident, the editor Mystic Technocrat, whom rashly initiated this edit war discussion on me, was solely banned themselves for 3 days for edit warring by administrator Ed Johnston on this same admin/edit war discussion that they initiated on me. Perhaps it’s karma? Just wanted to let the readers know, as I don’t believe in deleting talk discussions or events and I could not find the results of it anymore. Sirsentence (talk) 11:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
[edit] Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button
located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Matthew_hk tc 20:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
My apologies. Must have made an error and sent it before doing so. Thanks. Sirsentence (talk) 21:26, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Sirsentence. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Red Dead Online
[edit]Hello, you edits on Red Dead Online have been reverted because your sources doesn't support your claim that you need a physical copy of Red Dead Redemption 2 to play online. The sources indicate that you needed a physical copy of the Ultimate Edition to play the beta early but that both owners of the digital and physical copies of RDR2 can play the beta at the public release. Please provide sources that actually support your claim, Thanks. TheDeviantPro (talk) 23:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, my source clearly states that from the point of owning Red Dead Redemption 2, you have access to online. Red Dead Redemption 2 is a physical copy. If that’s a concern, you could just remove the word “physical” from it and it would be completely fine and word for word of the source. Either or, you must own Red Dead Redemption 2 to access the online game. That is not disputed and the source clearly states that. So may I ask why you delete the entirety of the edit instead of removing the one word you have an issue with? Thanks Sirsentence (talk) 23:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Of course you need Red Dead Redemption 2 to play Online since it's the online component for RDR 2. But that was not you were claiming, you claimed that you need a physical copy which nowhere in your source states that. Your sentence is kind of redundant anyways since being the online component for Red Dead Redemption 2 its implies you need RDR 2 to play it like with any other multiplayer component for a game, but I'll just leave it. TheDeviantPro (talk) 05:14, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate your criticism and opinion, but nowhere in the wiki article Red Dead Online does it clarify that you must own RDR2 in any form, thus claim of redundancy is invalid. As far as I know, there also is not any sole online purchase of the full game (unless on PlayStation 4 Plus or Steam) that isn’t physical CD form. Some people are not aware they must first own RDR2 before they play Red Dead Online. Such as myself. So I appreciate your input and decision to settle with the information I added. Thanks. Sirsentence (talk) 06:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
December, 2018
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
CBS527Talk 01:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Talk page assistance
[edit]Hi Sirsentence. I wanted to share with you a couple of pages to help you communicate more effectively on talk pages. One is Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. The other is Wikipedia:Indentation which explains the important conventions for formatting your talk page comments so that others understand who you are are responding to. Help:Talk pages also provides some guidance. Please let me know if you need any help. - MrX 🖋 13:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Hahaha. Thank you for your concern and taking the time to post this here. I am assuming you posted this on my personal talk page because you were not pinged about our talk page discussions on Racial views of Donald Trump. This of course is my assumption, given there is no indication of what made you suspect I needed this help to communicate more effectively on talk pages, but I appreciate your good faith effort and offer to help. Happy holidays. Cheers Sirsentence (talk) 18:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Savannah Conley
[edit]Hello, Sirsentence,
Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Savannah Conley! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Thanks for your new article on Savannah Conley.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]July 2020
[edit] Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Karen Bass seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Use the talk page, Talk:Karen Bass, if you want to attempt to develop WP:CONSENSUS for your proposed addition. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Frankly it’s YOU that should be initiating a consensus discussion, as YOU are the one deleting perfectly fine (notably sourced) information and QUOTES on the persons own wiki page. They are controversial comments though, so of course you come to censor. Are not you the one that should initiate the consensus before you completely delete other people’s edits? You’re not following your own protocol and then come here trying to act like it’s my responsibility to prove the information I placed with direct notable sources within the article? You’re the one with the burden to prove how a quote is not neutral. Hypocrisy. Sirsentence (talk) 19:10, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sirsentence, no, the WP:ONUS is on the person inserting the material to estabilsh consensus for inclusion. Even though the onus is on you, I have started a discussion section. Your proposed addition violates WP:NPOV and the specific wording you have used is a complete nonstarter. Whether or not the comments about Castro should be included or not requires consensus. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)