Jump to content

User talk:Shuipzv3/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Shuipzv3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 12:39, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to QI (E series), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 12:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't realise my edit was unconstructive. I will keep that in mind. Shuipzv3 (talk) 12:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
No Problem. PLease just make sure all your edits are properly sourced. Vrenator (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Here's a few of them: [1], [2]. In addition you may find it in the articles Malaria in the section "Historical Treatments", and Julius Wagner-Jauregg under "Nobel prize" (He won the 1927 Nobel Prize for medicine for this discovery). Shuipzv3 (talk) 13:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
I added it to the article because I thought some people might be interested in how malaria cures syphilis. It's my fault though that I didn't add refs. Shuipzv3 (talk) 13:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Fine - Just make your edit and include the references.Vrenator (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Aligning templates

I want to align the "Trivia" infobox to the right, and inline with the other two infoboxes at the top. It aligns to the right, but it doesn't stay at the top. How do i align it? Shuipzv3 (talk) 04:35, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry. I should have mentioned it is on my Userpage. Shuipzv3 (talk) 04:36, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Although I know tables are an evil way to layout these days, in this case, they simply are the easiest solution. I think this makes it look as you intended. Regards SoWhy 10:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you so much for helping. Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Hermitrage

Thanks! I corrected it by additing the info to the existing entry and to use redirect. Thanks. Krzyycho (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy Speedy deletion

Please don't tag articles for speedy deletion so soon after creation, like you did with Malayalee Association Greater Houston. You tagged it under A7 only 6 minutes after it was created. You need to give the author time to finish whatever process they're using before sending them the dramatic "Your page is about to be deleted!" WP:NPP recommends at least 15 minutes after the last edit; personally, I never tag anything other than really bad stuff (like attack pages or copyvios) in less than about 2 hours. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Sorry. I will keep that in mind. Shuipzv3 (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Shuipzv3. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Anti-spam barnstar

The Anti-Spam Barnstar
I'm giving you this barnstar for rolling back a spammer's edit so quickly -- three minutes after it was added! Thank you for helping keep this spammer at bay. Wshallwshall (talk) 00:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Shuipzv3 (talk) 03:07, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
You gave me a barnstar, so I thought I would give you a cookie in return. Thanks! :) SwisterTwister talk 00:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Yummy thanks! Shuipzv3 (talk) 00:08, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


ok im using this guys question treat to comunicate with you. (cuz i can't start a new discussion)(it seems only SOME people have the right. what6 is that censorship, you're only permitting people ,who thinks like the society want us to think, comunicate with you?ù0 why did you suppress my input with abraham lincoln. it was true. but oh let me guess, you just think what everybody else think about who was abraham lincoln. ok, im in a religion that has invented a device capable of seeing the past and i have seen the true history, i have seen the illuminati, the childhood of abraham lincoln, the lizard man, the real ancester of man(a race of alien known as the covenant). in order to achieve this i had to breath some plant the priest gave me. theseplant gives a lot of things. you should go to my church if you dont trust me. It's the siberan church. im a siberan.

Talk

and i think that the siberan who knows the truth have the right to express there view on wikipedia. Wikipedia is an public encyclopedie who is made by the input of everybody, every religion, every culture. especially the siberan who knows the truth. and do you know how many satellite controls our brains. no! i know. there's 3051 of them. i knew it and you didn't knew it. so that's the proof i'm right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.230.140.53 (talk) 01:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

We don't discriminate against anyone, thats why Wikipedia is the free encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. But we do have policies regarding editing on Wikipedia, such as Verifiability and Notability. After you familiarise yourself with these policies, you are welcomed to make constructive edits. Shuipzv3 (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


why are you refering me to that. you know that i dont agree that my input was vandalism. you just know youre wrong and youre afraid of the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.230.140.53 (talk) 01:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

If you insist on publishing your conspiracy theories on Wikipedia, at least cite your sources. If you don't know how to do that, this will help: Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. By the way, your edits DO constitute as vandalism, and I have no reason to be afraid of your scare tactics. Shuipzv3 (talk) 02:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Shuipzv3! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done Shuipzv3 (talk) 22:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Regarding Carbon tax see carbon pricing

Of interest, per your edits on carbon tax: see carbon pricing. (",) Correct terms, are not influenced by "everybody does it".

Here is a direct link: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Carbon_tax&diff=455205281&oldid=455183459

99.181.157.189 (talk) 05:53, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Well, if you live in Australia, the legislation is commonly called the "carbon tax" by the public and media, even though you might be right and it really is "carbon pricing". Shuipzv3 (talk) 06:23, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
And there are many ways to price carbon emissions, but the method used by the Australian government in this case is a carbon tax. Shuipzv3 (talk) 06:28, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Don't revert

FC Seoul Friendly matches's statistics is wrong. I copyed another article. I am modifying. This is not vandal. Footwiks (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

I know, I'm sorry for rollbacking prematurely. Shuipzv3 (talk) 09:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit Warring at Charlie Hebdo

Hi, thanks for the notice on edit warring. For the record: I undid a user's misquote of a linked AP article, then this went back and forth a few times since the user kept reinserting the misquote. I then desisted from attempting to remedy the vandalism through further edits, and instead requested the user's blockage, which was effected by a moderator. Ni'jluuseger (talk) 11:39, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Adam Levine

Hi, sorry for issuing a warning to the IP when, in fact, you reacted quicker than me and reverted - I thought I had reverted and didn't check. Denisarona (talk) 07:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Its alright, it has happened to me plenty of times before. Shuipzv3 (talk) 07:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Ecclesiastical ring edits

Please bring issues to the talk page before you make revisions such as today's. Thank you. Djathinkimacowboy 20:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Personally, I think the article needs some attention regarding its style, such as merging some sentences into relevant paragraphs, and introducing double spacing is not solving the problem. Shuipzv3 (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Reckless Editing

Hi thank you for your post on the talk page of 220.255.2.137. Please do note that it is spelled as 'Asian Civilisations Museum' and not 'Asian Civillisations Museum'. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the spelling has been rectified, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jamiebijania (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice, sorry for my bad spelling. Shuipzv3 (talk) 08:52, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Linking dates in Year in Country series

You recently reverted edits in 2011 in the United States and 2011 in Canada relating to the linkage of dates. This issue has now become the subject of a discussion here, and your comments are welcome. Davshul (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Hope so you like Cheeseburger. Thanks for clean-up support :-) AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 07:25, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! Shuipzv3 (talk) 07:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
You 're welcome:-)
is there any way to protect Userpage from anonymous (waste)unwanted edits edits? AbhiSuryawanshi (talk) 07:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
You can ask for semi-protection from administrators here. Shuipzv3 (talk) 07:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

"Plot spoilers" Special:Contributions/Jmaxmiller11

Hello Shuipzv3.

Thanks for putting me right on this one Actually, I was only putting into acceptable format, the edit which Jmaxmiller 11(Talk) had just posted. You should read it. Special:Contributions/Jmaxmiller11

Once again, I appreciate your input.

Best wishes,

Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 09:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

No problem, best wishes to you too, and happy editing. Shuipzv3 (talk) 09:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Warnings

Hi, there's no need to leave three warnings all at once like this—you can just start with the warning level you feel is appropriate (usually a level 1 unless it's clearly in bad faith). Also, if the user has {{repeatvandal}} (the box that says "this IP has been repeatedly blocked for vandalism; further abuse may result in an extended block") at the top of their talk apge, you can report them straight to WP:AIV or to the admin who last blocked them. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, I appreciate it. Shuipzv3 (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Shuipzv3. You have new messages at Methecooldude's talk page.
Message added 11:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 11:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Margaret Thatcher

Hi, can you take a look at the last edit you made to Margaret Thatcher article. The date given in the infobox is the date of the marriage not the birth of Dennis Thatcher. Keith D (talk) 01:39, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for notifying me for my error, apologies for my haste. I have reverted my edit. Shuipzv3 (talk) 02:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks - it has come up several times on that page. Keith D (talk) 12:24, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Seismology

Why? --194.150.65.28 (talk) 06:30, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Because your edit to Seismology does not appear to be constructive. Shuipzv3 (talk) 06:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
But what if it is? --194.150.65.28 (talk) 06:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Ask yourself, is it something you want to see in an encyclopaedia? Jokes may appear harmless, but they compromise the quality of articles in Wikipedia. Shuipzv3 (talk) 06:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
But does it appear to be a joke or is it really? --194.150.65.28 (talk) 06:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
From what I can see its an attempt. Shuipzv3 (talk) 06:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Says someone with only forty userboxes on their page. Ha ha! --194.150.65.28 (talk) 06:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

I don't see how that has anything to do with your edit. Shuipzv3 (talk) 06:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Well, it only appears not to have anything to do with my edit. --194.150.65.28 (talk) 06:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Your point is? Shuipzv3 (talk) 06:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
My point is that it appears you're going to let me troll you indefinitely. Grow a spine. --194.150.65.28 (talk) 06:54, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Says the one who reverted my edit. Keep going, wanna get blocked? Shuipzv3 (talk) 06:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
I don't see how that has anything to do with Seismology. --194.150.65.28 (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
You already have two three warnings. Continue at this rate and you will be blocked. Shuipzv3 (talk) 07:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
For what? Talking to you? --194.150.65.28 (talk) 07:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

And blanking your page doesn't mean its gone. Shuipzv3 (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The first one was your "joke", which resulted in this very conversation, the second was because you thought its funny to revert my edit, which was clearly vandalism. Have I adequately answered your question? Shuipzv3 (talk) 07:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
No. Please tell me more. --194.150.65.9 (talk) 08:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
I think you know the reasons yourself. Shuipzv3 (talk) 08:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
On the contrary! I've completely forgotten what we were talking about! (Note: I had to go and get pizza so my IP changed. I didn't do it on purpose.) --194.150.65.9 (talk) 08:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
No, no, no, you know it. Unless you acknowledge that, I'll remain silent from now on. Shuipzv3 (talk) 08:51, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Shuipsv! I notice that I have not been the only registered/logged-in editor to be plagued by belligerent anons this January. The iritation is further compounded by the fact that it is generally pointless posting at the current IP address, because the anon will only jump up out of another somewhat similar-looking address to continue his/her campaign. All the best for 2012. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 09:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, those pesky trolls have wasted my efforts and time that may otherwise be used for something useful. Happy editing to you too! Shuipzv3 (talk) 09:44, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Tense of Fictional Works

as per WP:TENSE:

Works of fiction are generally considered to "come alive" when read. They exist in a kind of perpetual present tense, regardless of when the fictional action is supposed to take place relative to "now." Thus, generally you should write about fiction using the present tense, not the past tense.
"Homer presents, Achilles rages, Andromache laments, Priam pleads."
"Darth Vader is a fictional character from Star Wars."
"Holden Caulfield has a certain disdain for what he sees as 'phony'."
"Heathcliff, who is taken in by the wealthy Earnshaw family as a child, falls in love with their daughter, Catherine."
Friends is an American sitcom that was aired on NBC.

Reubot (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

I checked WP:TVLEAD and it confirmed what you said. Thank you for setting me straight. Shuipzv3 (talk) 00:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Jean-Marie Le Pen

I'm french citizen, how dare you question the French opinon on such a racist and fascist party as the FN. I read you're a Malaysian guy, so you should not interfere with French interior affairs. Let me remind you that "Le Pen" is the leader of an extremist french party, who plans to deny citizenship to all strangers. He his planning (and his daughter) on instauring a racist regime. This includes Malaysian people. So if you mind about racism, you better think twice before deleting such a magnificent post as mine on Le Pen's true identity. It's for the cause. The anonymous...(guy) The matrix is everywhere, you are just a programm. Try violating its rules and have a nice life :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.100.28.233 (talk) 07:22, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I do know who he is, and personally I don't agree with his politics too. But no matter what you think about him, or anybody else, we have to be maintain neutrality. Shuipzv3 (talk) 07:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Hmmm, if think wikipedia doesn't have the good definition of neutrality, but you're right, it's all about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.100.28.233 (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Date format

Hi! I saw your changes on Mila Kunis' article for some dates so I was wondering, what format is the best? I know when one type is chosen it should be the same in the whole article for consistency, but is it better to put the date in numbers like 2012-02-08 or in letters like February 8, 2012 or 8 February 2012? What's the difference? Is it specified somewhere on wiki what we should do? --Sofffie7 (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Since Mila Kunis is an American, and the Americans typically uses the format month before date, like February 9, 2012. See WP:STRONGNAT for date formats according to the countries. WP:DATERET also says we should follow the format already used on the page. Shuipzv3 (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for your answer :-) --Sofffie7 (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Autoblock

Are you sure you got the correct autoblock number? I cannot find that autoblock. (It may also have expired.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I copied and pasted the exact message the software generated for me when I got autoblocked. Since I can edit now from this school IP (it was blocked yesterday for vandalism), so I guess the block has expired. Shuipzv3 (talk) 21:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Small error, no need thanking for! ;D but you're welcome! -- MST☆R (Chat Me!) 07:09, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released

Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - okeyes@wikimedia.org.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:13, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

tb

Hello, Shuipzv3. You have new messages at Arcandam's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arcandam (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Go Back To Where You Came From, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hazara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: North Sydney Girls High School

Hello

I do not see how my contributions to the "North Sydney Girls High School" page were not constructive. In my revision, I merely corrected the logo so that it displayed the image properly rather than '130px' (broken link) before. Please undo your reversion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ConcernedHistorian1 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

You actually fixed the first image in the infobox, I'll give you that, and I have reverted my error. However, why did you put 'edittt' in another image down below? That messed up the other image. Shuipzv3 (talk) 13:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Dill

I saw your recent edit to the article on Dill. I saw that you changed "bao" to "baoz" in a link. I don't know enough to comment on whether this is correct or not, but when I looked at the edit just before yours (in Edit History), I saw that in the very next sentence the word "bao" appears. If the word is changed in one place, shouldn't it be changed in another? CorinneSD (talk) 16:18, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Oh thanks for pointing that out, I didn't pay enough attention and overlooked that. I'll fix it right away. Shuipzv3 (talk) 17:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Submarine

Hello there Shuipzv3!

Now, it seems as if you have altered an ammendment that I made to the Submarine page, wherein I summerised the character of Oliver as a 'ninny'.

You seem to have taken umbrage at this fact, and rather oddly referred to the usage of the classifier as 'biased'. I disagree. I think that it is obvious that the film makers intended Oliver to appear as a bit of a ninny: a noun which the online dictionary suggests is derived from innocent, and means naive or simpleton, which Oliver clearly is (in the nicest way possible).

It looks like that you either disagree with my assertion, or you don't understand it. Now, if it is the latter, then you should have left alone, and if it is the former, you need to watch the film!

Who on earth/the internet gave you the right to swap usueful and insightful details about at your discretion?!?!

Last month I chucked a few quid Wikipedia's way: I think I might be asking for it back if this is the type of service I recieve!!

Please explain. I'm sure that there has been some misunderstanding!

Your pal

Sugartips — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.37.144 (talk) 19:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello Sugartips. Allow me first to thank you for your donation. The reason why I reverted your edit was because it violated one of the three core policies of Wikipedia: Neutral point of view. The contents in the encyclopedia should be written from a neutral, objective stance, and your edit that "Oliver is a bit of a ninny" does not constitute neutrality. This Oliver in the film may be a ninny after all (and yes I do know the meaning), but the aim of the encyclopedia is to be objective, and not to be someone's (including yours') personal opinion. I do welcome constructive edits from you, and I urge you to familiarise yourself with some of our guidelines here such as Verifiability, No original research, and Vandalism. Happy editing. Shuipzv3 (talk) 11:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Submarine continued

Ok Shuipez3- what a lovely reply.

I don't agree with what you have said though- think about it; the boy's ninnyness is his defining characteristic, like alcoholic is Nic Cage's character's defining feature in Leaving Las Vegas, or PTS defines Robert De Niro's Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver!

But I am not one to argue- if I change it to waht it should be, you'll only change it back!

All the best pal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.37.144 (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ellen Brekken may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Norwegian]] [[jazz]] musician who plays [[double bass|upright bass]] and the [[bass guitar]]). She currently lives in [[Oslo]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:59, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

 Done Shuipzv3 (talk) 14:32, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

u ashole

wtf my edit was god and u change it screw u nman

I know all you did was fix the grammar, but that part shouldn't have been in the article in the first place. Shuipzv3 (talk) 05:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Policy discussion in progress

There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "Someone like You", a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 17:03, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shuipzv3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to the Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 1

The 3rd Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup had now arrived on Selangor! Pack your bags and your laptop, and meet some fellow Malaysia Wikipedians in the meetup!

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page or at the Facebook event page. (Delivered: 07:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC))

Invitation to the Wikipedia Selangor Meetup 2

The 4th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time on Selangor, and you are invited!

→ To collaborate between Wikipedia Malaysia User Group and Sunway Group, a large corporation in Malaysia.
→ To create Wikipedia (and other Wikimedia projects)'s articles and edit/improve articles on the spot.

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquires, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please add your name here. (Delivered: 11:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC))

Invitation to the Wikipedia Johor Meetup 2

The 5th Wikipedia Malaysia Meetup will be held for the second time in Johor. Since it is at holiday, check it out if you have time!

This meetup was initiated by Chongkian and the invitation was written and sent by NgYShung. For more information and updates, see the meetup page. If there is any enquirers, feel free to discuss at the talk page. If you wish to opt-out of any future Malaysia meetup invitation, please add your name here. (Delivered: 03:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC))

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hillary Scott (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Remains. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shuipzv3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shuipzv3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of You Need to Calm Down

Hello! Your submission of You Need to Calm Down at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 20:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shuipzv3/Archive_1&oldid=1145815125"