User talk:Sharp Kid

Hi

Question

So I'm assuming that since you did this, that means you are Cool-Dude Tim? -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 19:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct

Yeah, Scorpion it is Cool-Dude Tim. Look on your talk page for more info I have written.

Okay, against my better judgment, I'm going to let you have a second chance since it has been over a year since you were active. You are more than welcome here if you are going to edit constructively, but if you start adding nonsense like you have in the past, then you will be blocked. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 20:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scorpion is right. You are welcome here; I'm sure you will edit constructively this time around. Good luck. Gran² 20:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there is anything you need to tell me in private, then you can e-mail me. There are no private pages on wikipedia. Go to my user page and on the left hand side in the "Toolbox" section, you should see an option titled "e-mail this user". You can also e-mail Gran this way. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 03:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try this -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 13:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jubnuk

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jubnuk, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable minor star wars character

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Baileypalblue (talk) 14:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

400th Episode listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 400th Episode. Since you had some involvement with the 400th Episode redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thegreatluigi (talk) 13:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Elaska" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Elaska. Since you had some involvement with the Elaska redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Ulaska" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ulaska. Since you had some involvement with the Ulaska redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Elaska" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Elaska should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Elaska until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ulaska" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Ulaska should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#Ulaska until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:21, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]