User talk:Sguo123

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I've finished the editing of a page in my sandbox, and published changes. The account has existed more than 4 days, and I edited my draft many times. I am ready to move. But, I cannot find a "more" or "move" option next to "search" menu. Can you let me know where I can find this option? Many thanks! Sguo123 (talk) 01:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account is not yet autoconfirmed and I've added the AFC template to your sandbox so you can submit it for review when you think it is ready. If you think it is ready right now to be moved into article space, I'm afraid you are sadly mistaken.

The first thing you need to do is disclose your connection with your subject. There are instructions regarding conflict of interest that apply to you.

The next thing you need to find are some articles about the project that are independent of you and your colleagues. These independent articles are necessary to establish notability. Add them to your draft as references, not external links.

Only then would it make sense to click on the 'Submit your draft for review' button. There are other issues in your draft, such as external links in the body, that will have to be fixed, but these first two are the most important right now. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I do not understand this statement "Your account is not yet autoconfirmed." How can I confirm this accuunt? Can you give me some instructions or add a button for me to click? Second, a related question, how can I declare no conflict of interest? Can you add a button on my sandbox, so I can click and fill up the information required to meet the criteria? Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sguo123 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Autoconfirmed status is automatic after an account is both 4 days old and has made 10 edits. You don't need to do anything extra.

I assumed from your username and the fact that you are writing about this subject that you are Sujian Guo. If not, you should consider changing your username to avoid this confusion. If you are Guo, you need to understand that writing about this project that you founded is very definitely a conflict of interest that should be disclosed according to Wikipedia's policies. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:28, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your advice. I will change the username to avoid confusion...

June 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Global Justice Index, from its old location at User:Sguo123/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Editor, thanks for your prompt review feedback. Please allow me to explain. 1) We have seen World Jutice Project which publishes "Rule of Law Index" online, which are carried in wikipedia. The global justice index is the first project in the world, which does not have presence in wikipedia. I hope you would believe it is a great valuable addition to the wikipedia. 2) This Global Justice Index is the first initiative and research project luanched by Fudan Institute for Advanced Study in Social Sciences (Fudan IAS), a non-western country, and it should enhance the diversity of profiles in wikipedia too. 3) This is an institutional effort to create a page in wikipedia, not by or for an individual. We are in a similar situation like the World Justice Project page created by the institution. If you look at the WJP page, you will see they also use their own material to publish the contents of the page: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/World_Justice_Project 4) As the director of the Fudan IAS, I can assure you that there is no copyright issue of the website material created by Fudan IAS global justice project. We created this website for the purpose of offering our research results to all readers around the world for free, thus we have never applied for the copyright, as we do not want the copyright to restrict readers to download, use or reuse our material around the world. You won't find the fact that this website is copyrighted if you search any database around the world. I hope you would reevaluate and reconsider your decision to release this page to the readers. If you have any further question, please do let me know. Thank you so much for your reconsideration. |}

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Justice Index (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from globaljustice.fudan.edu.cn/Global. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Global Justice Index may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 08:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sguo123! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 08:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]