User talk:Sgracanin

Welcome

Hello, Sgracanin, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 01:41, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danube hidden heritage (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danube hidden heritage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danube hidden heritage, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sgracanin! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danube hidden heritage (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.interreg-danube.eu/uploads/media/approved_project_output/0001/25/04ef194aa8261ad94e733e9b4307601623f8ddfa.pdf. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Danube hidden heritage may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:15, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Danube hidden heritage

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Danube hidden heritage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.interreg-danube.eu/uploads/media/approved_project_output/0001/25/04ef194aa8261ad94e733e9b4307601623f8ddfa.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danube hidden heritage (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This must have third-party references to show general usage and notability. Its own web site is not sufficient.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danube hidden heritage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danube hidden heritage, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Danube hidden heritage

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Danube hidden heritage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.interreg-danube.eu/uploads/media/approved_project_output/0001/25/1b2717b823003ea5c8443183ed9ea4696a510ffc.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 06:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Danube hidden heritage has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Danube hidden heritage. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danube hidden heritage (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm still not sure how this qualifies for an article. There are a bunch of references, but they're not directly about this topic, and a search for this subject doesn't turn up anything terribly relevant.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danube hidden heritage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Danube hidden heritage, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– bradv🍁 04:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Brad. Please understand my continuous frustration with the incompetence this article has suffered from people who just did not care enough to give this article a PROPER review and/or provide good natured suggestions on how to make this article appear and get published in accordance to the convoluted value system that is being enforced by this site's editors. Thus, my rant. Perhaps it might invite a person with intellectual capacities beyond Taylor Swift to help get this article published. Here goes: I undestand that the EU might not be relevant to you. I also understand that Cultural Heritage might not be relevant to you. I also understand that seeing the GLOBAL significance of cultural routes, preserving Hidden Heritage and the fact that for THIS project over 1.6 Mio. Euro have been used to map out Hidden Heritage sites along the Danube and these will be used by Tourism organisations all over Europe to create and refine Cultural Routes where millions of people will travel down the Danube in order to experience various Heritage sites, as listed in this article, means NOTHING to YOU. I also understand that 3 follow up projects, which will build upon this project and use this site to expand Hidden Heritage sites and cultural routes means nothing to YOU. The fact that the EU and the European Commission found this Project to be relevant means NOTHING to YOU. Also the fact that over 100 people, scientists, cultural entities and 12 countries collaborated that this project happened, it also means nothing to YOU. What is the relevance of this article? It will be used by thousands of Touristic entities, workers, travel agents, ship route planners, Interreg Programme individuals, Touristic route planners, tourists, historians and who knows how many more people find this site relevant, but they all are not YOU. You are discriminating European Hidden Heritage, you are biased against Europe and European Union and frankly should not be tasked with any reviews that have to do with anything beyond popular culture. I request that someone with at least some sense and sensitivity for Hidden Heritage, Cultural Heritage and Culture, History and Science be tasked with reviewing this article. Almost ONE YEAR I am fighting here to find someone who is capable of understanding the importance of Hidden Heritage and THERE IS NOT A SINGLE PERSON available on Wikipedia with such a capacity. Wikipedia is truly a disgrace for the Encyclopaedias of the old. At least the Encyclopaedias of old used to care about Heritage, History and scientific work. Oh, and by the way, several of the authors that were listed in references collaborated and participated on this project. Thus the relevance of their inclusion. Sgracanin (talk) 12:58, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Danube hidden heritage concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Danube hidden heritage, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Danube hidden heritage concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Danube hidden heritage, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danube hidden heritage

Hello, Sgracanin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danube hidden heritage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danube hidden heritage

Hello, Sgracanin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danube hidden heritage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:12, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danube hidden heritage

Hello, Sgracanin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danube hidden heritage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:47, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]