User talk:Sepehr.Sǎsǎni

About the warning

Ok, I was told that I was too harsh with the warning. I would have retracted it, but you have already deleted it. I did not mean harm, but it is wise to read WP:OR and obey it. Tgeorgescu (talk) 00:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

@Sepehr.Sǎsǎni: I agree with the above comment. While i think a level 3 warning was a bit too harsh, i think you need to read carefully WP:OR, WP:VER and WP:RS. If you have any question, just ask. Best regards.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:41, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

hi. thank you for the guidance. no i did not offended at all. why should i. since all of my edits on en.wiki Reverted to this time, i won't edit en articles anymore. thanks again. hope the best for both of you Sepehr.Sǎsǎni (talk) 00:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC) @Wikaviani: @Tgeorgescu:

Reverts are not meant to offend you or anybody else, they just mean that you need to achieve WP:CONSENSUS for them. Many of my own edits have been reverted, especially my first ones. You're free to leave EN.WIKI of course, but if you change your mind and decide to stay, i'll be happy to help you if you need so, just let me know. Best regards.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Yup, my first edits, too, because I had no idea what Wikipedia is about, see User talk:Kazuba#RE: Leonora Piper. Tgeorgescu (talk) 01:11, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

thank you very much guys. i appriciate it very much. my english is not proper for editing en.wiki and i always spend a lot to make a simple phrase, and it will be reverted for sure. so its a waste of time. it is better for me to get back to fa.wiki. thanks again and best regards for both of you guys. Sepehr.Sǎsǎni (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:08, 10 March 2019 (UTC)بنابراین من آرزو می کنم که شما برادر موفق باشید

i appriciate it my friend. you too.🙏Sepehr.Sǎsǎni (talk) 04:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Please think a litte bit yourself

I realize from your comments above that you aren't fluent in English. As such, it's not a good idea to keep reverting people who are fluent in English without trying to find out why they keep reverting you first.

In your edits here on the F-22, you confused two things that led to your errors.

1. First, "In April 1992, the second YF-22 crashed..." meant the second YF-22 to be built, not the second one to crash.
2. Second, "The first F-22 crash occurred during takeoff at Nellis AFB on 20 December 2004" meant the first crash of a production F-22, not including the previous YF-22 crash.

I realize English can be complicated, but you do yourself a disservice by not relying on people who are fluent in English to help explain. That doesn't mean we're always right, but we usually are when it comes to comprehending what is written. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 23:03, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

IAIO Qaher-313

I noticed that you added an extremely poor quality image supposedly of a Qaher-313 prototype to the IAIO Qaher-313 article. Just because other language Wikipedias use the image does not mean the image is better than nothing. The image was added to the articles on the other languages by a single user, M.k.m2003, so your statement "as you can see the picture has no problem by all people across the world except you. which makes 'you' a different person" is incorrect. All of those articles appear to go unedited for long periods of time, with the addition of the image being the last non-bot edit in most cases. It appears that "all people across the world" missed the addition of the image and did nothing about it. - ZLEA _T\^C 12:27, 31 October 2019 //(UTC)@ZLEA:@Ahunt:

(Redacted)Sepehr.Sǎsǎni (talk) 12:38, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Please note that your recent comment above was not very civil. Wikipedia requires that contributors be civil to make collaborating to build the encyclopedia possible. In future please be more polite in your comments. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 12:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at IAIO Qaher-313 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Ahunt (talk) 12:59, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

@Ahunt: (Redacted) Sepehr.Sǎsǎni (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Please note that your comment above was not very civil. Wikipedia requires that contributors be civil to make collaborating to build the encyclopedia possible. In future please be more polite in your comments. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

(Redacted)Sepehr.Sǎsǎni (talk) 18:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

== (Redacted) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepehr.Sǎsǎni (talk • contribs)