User talk:Scvlla
Perverts
[edit]Yesterday, I started a section on the talk page of the article you did a page move recently, regarding the classification of Perverts. As I mentioned there, most reliable sources call it either an album or a "project", none describes it as an "EP"; we should follow what the sources say. If this does not change on the following days, I will be suggesting an RM. Also, do not add unsourced conclusions, e.g. "debuted two new songs from the EP", it is WP:OR. CatchMe (talk) 17:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- I know this is a late reply, but I'm wondering how the "reliable sources" you mentioned could be more reliable as the artists own words. She has referred to Perverts as an EP multiple times. Notably in her Instagram and Tumblr comments under the linked posts (I linked screenshots of these replies below). It's clear why some sources would see a 90-minute project and immediately refer to it as an album, but it's important to listen to what the artist has to say. There have been EPs in the past with long runtimes, e.g. "How To Leave Town" by Car Seat Headrest. I would appreciate it if you would allow me to edit the page, or if you could do it yourself, thanks!
- Instagram and Tumblr replies:
- https://ibb.co/MR47yMr
- https://ibb.co/vZnLGzM Scvlla (talk) 08:55, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit]
Hi Scvlla! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Perverts (album) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Perverts (album), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:08, 16 December 2024 (UTC)