User talk:Sammi Brie/Archive 39
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Sammi Brie. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 35 | ← | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | → | Archive 43 |
Hey, about that request...
I was over in Tampa, Florida today for an interview and did some "drive-by" shots of two stations: WTVT and WFTS-TV. Hopefully they are of decent enough quality. If not, I can always go back and take some more images when I am over there again. The WTVT station is located near my favorite cake shop, ever (period, exclamation point). If you ever go to Tampa, go to Wrights! Also a picture of a dog, because... Adog (Talk・Cont) 16:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
- These are great, @Adog. I haven't done WTVT yet, but the SkyTower is really photographable. Also adorable dog. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
-
A view of the WFTS-TV station from its corner. -
Road leading up to station (left) and Raymond James (foreground; center). -
Main view of WFTS-TV station from road.
-
A view of the WTVT from nearby neighborhood. -
View of WTVT from opposite road of tower, dishes, and partial station.
-
Me on my way to Tampa to ace an interview and get pics for Sammi Brie.
Books & Bytes – Issue 58
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023
- New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
- Tech tip: Filters
- Wikimania presentation
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Wendy McMahon (television executive)
On 12 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wendy McMahon (television executive), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that CBS News and Stations president Wendy McMahon helped bring local evening news back to the network's Detroit station after 20 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wendy McMahon (television executive). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wendy McMahon (television executive)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 16:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
The Center Line: Fall 2023
Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter
- Features
- —delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for WNUV
On 13 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article WNUV, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Baltimore TV station aspired to be "the Cadillac of independents"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WNUV. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, WNUV), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 12:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for KAGI
On 14 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KAGI, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the founding manager of an Oregon radio station named it after his wife's former name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KAGI. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, KAGI), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for WFYI (TV)
On 15 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article WFYI (TV), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an "army" of women were congratulated by Pat Nixon for their fundraising efforts to bring public TV to Indianapolis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WFYI (TV). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, WFYI (TV)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vaticidalprophet 00:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for KUVS-DT
On 16 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KUVS-DT, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chester Smith's California TV station ran its newscast on a "dental floss budget", as one former anchor put it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KUVS-DT. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, KUVS-DT), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
New shows
There has been some new shows here including 3 court shows by Allen Media Group that need to be created on Wikipedia. They are Equal Justice with Judge Eboni K. Williams, Justice for the People with Judge Milian, and Mathis Court with Judge Mathis and the other by Crazy Legs Television Cutlers Courts (not the same as Couples Court with the Cutlers. And a game show called Person, Place or Thing. If you decide to create these, let me know and I will try to help you. OWaunTon (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- @OWaunTon A television show can be syndicated and still not attract sufficient significant coverage to pass the GNG. The Allen court shows are a dime a dozen. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Catholic radio call swap in Massachusetts
I figured I'd bring to your attention a call swap involving the two Catholic radio stations on 88.5 FM in southeastern Massachusetts: the call signs of WPMW and WRRS were swapped on August 15. One additional complication is that a "Viking funeral" situation may be in play: the Middleborough Center facility (ex-WRRS, now WPMW) has a construction permit to upgrade its signal that will eventually result in the closure of the Bayview station (ex-WPMW, now WRRS), though no further filings to that conclusion have (yet) been made. I've reworked the text accordingly, but obviously the requisite page moves are a bit more complex here in all possible ways. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:13, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Made the swap, @Wcquidditch. If a Viking funeral happens, the correct article title will be WPMW (Bayview, Massachusetts). Thanks for coming to me for this one. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for WAND (TV)
On 20 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article WAND (TV), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that employees resigned from an Illinois TV station after ownership decided there were too many people on the payroll? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WAND (TV). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, WAND (TV)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 12:03, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for 1989 South Florida television affiliation switch
On 22 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1989 South Florida television affiliation switch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that CBS executive Laurence Tisch found out on a tennis court in the U.S. Virgin Islands that rival network NBC had bought his company's affiliate station in Miami? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1989 South Florida television affiliation switch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1989 South Florida television affiliation switch), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of KCPQ
Would you mind taking a look at this disaster, please? I'm not allowed to do any reverts, else that entire new section added today would be gone per OR. The whole thing needs a rewrite. Thanks! - Neutralhomer • Talk • 17:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Neutralhomer Just did what I could to shore it up. Probably needs more, but this will at least help the emphasis. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:32, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Awesome, thanks! :D - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for WCSH
On 25 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article WCSH, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Maine TV station was so protective of its evening newscast that it preempted nearly 40 percent of all NBC Sports programming in 1994? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WCSH. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, WCSH), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for KDNL-TV
On 27 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KDNL-TV, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one reviewer described a TV station in St. Louis as appearing to be "not serious about the news"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KDNL-TV. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, KDNL-TV), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on WQAD-TV
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page WQAD-TV, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:51, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
The article WLES has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KisiOlus (talk) 08:14, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- All links on the wiki are invalid, and not all valid links are noteworthy. KisiOlus (talk) 08:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is an improper way to handle this, @KisiOlus. Anyone can remove a prod notice. Once that is done, the only recourse to seek deletion of the page is to open a discussion on AfD. I am an editor with ample experience in this topic area, where to get sourcing, etc. Frankly I do not understand the deletion rationale you have provided here. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize if this topic has been opened in the wrong place, I am a new user on Wikipedia and I am trying to help it improve. KisiOlus (talk) 08:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- I appreciate that. It's 1:30am where I live, but give me a chance and I should be able to get some better sourcing around WLES soon. It won't be perfect, but it should be better. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:32, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- I apologize if this topic has been opened in the wrong place, I am a new user on Wikipedia and I am trying to help it improve. KisiOlus (talk) 08:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is an improper way to handle this, @KisiOlus. Anyone can remove a prod notice. Once that is done, the only recourse to seek deletion of the page is to open a discussion on AfD. I am an editor with ample experience in this topic area, where to get sourcing, etc. Frankly I do not understand the deletion rationale you have provided here. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:28, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Re: KPHE-LD
The infobox isn't showing up right. You got KAZS before the lead paragraph. Anyway to fix it? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 07:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Mvcg66b3r I'm trying to troubleshoot. Using two child boxes is causing some issues. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
DYK for CKMI-DT
On 1 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article CKMI-DT, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that MI-5 had trouble finding people to interview? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/CKMI-DT. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, CKMI-DT), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.
Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)
Second Set of Eyes
Could you take a look at this edit? I don't believe it was done with malice, I believe the user read the Consent Decree wrong. I re-read it and it appears Liberty University/WQLU was issued a $10,000 and had the license approved.....at least that's how I'm reading it. A second set (in this case, third) would determine who is correct. Again, I think this is a minor misreading and nothing "bad". - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the license for radio station WQLU(FM), Lynchburg, Virginia IS CANCELLED.
This is an odd consent decree, Neutralhomer. They agreed to pay $10,000 and terminate the license. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)- I did not catch that part. This is why I needed that second set of eyes. :) Thanks! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
KNIN
Thanks for catching that; I wasn't sure if KYUU was previously carrying KBOI newscasts or not in those timeslots, so I have no issue with your removal there. The confusing language of the 'facilities and services agreement' (new to me) really doesn't help either as I don't know whether to call it an SSA or LMA equivalent (the latter's unlikely as Marquee continues to control their ads and RTC negotiations). Nate • (chatter) 19:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- @MrSchimpf This is a page I'm intending for Good Article status. And that sort of detail would fail a spot check.
- The closest equivalent to this is KMSB/KTTU (TV). In the Boise arrangement, though, the employees work out of separate sites. I wouldn't even put Sinclair in the operator box. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on WFRV-TV
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page WFRV-TV, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on WFRV-TV
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page WFRV-TV, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Need Your Expertise
Would you mind taking a look at this post for me? Tried to ping, but I goofed it up. Anyway, I think it's notable under GNG, but you have far more experience in this area than I do. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of WDIG (AM)
Hello! Your submission of WDIG (AM) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 00:23, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK for KHHZ
On 12 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KHHZ, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the founder of a California radio station "didn't want to do background music"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KHHZ. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, KHHZ), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 01:58, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK for CJOK-FM
On 14 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article CJOK-FM, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a radio station in Alberta fell afoul of Canadian content guidelines because new songs by Anne Murray were not Canadian enough? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/CJOK-FM. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, CJOK-FM), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Thanks a ton for your work cleaning up Paulina Alexis. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC) |
- I haven't done nearly as much as you, Beccaynr, VQuakr, Ltbdl, DFlhb, and Nthep. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- All I did was remove a bit of copyvio. You brought broader attention to it. You deserve plenty of credit. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- Your BLPN post is what caught my attention, Sammi Brie, so thank you very much for raising the issues and for your edits to the article. Cheers, Beccaynr (talk) 00:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- I second that; cheers to all, DFlhb (talk) 02:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Early prime time
On 17 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Early prime time, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the early 1990s, several TV stations in Northern California experimented with moving prime time up an hour? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Early prime time. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Early prime time), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WLIW (TV) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
GAN Request
Hey Sammi! Can you review my GA nomination for Australian rock band AC/DC? — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 10:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
wsns-tv
Sammi Brie, i had a few questions regarding this article and the associated blurb.
- is it appropriate to say that a station broadcasts a network? i'm admittedly out of my element here, so i may just be unfamiliar with the construction used in the blurb's opening sentence. to me, the wording used in the article's opening sentence seems more natural, but i am having trouble compressing that for the blurb. the best i could come up with was replacing "broadcasting" with "and an outlet for".
- I'm not helped here by the "owned-and-operated station" part. I can't say it's an affiliate. I do think "broadcasting" is kind of important here given that a lot of non-topic users are gonna read this.
- the full name of essaness theatres appears to be "Essaness Theatres Corporation", according this illinois supreme court decision. would it be more appropriate to capitalize the 'c' in "corporation" in the blurb?
- Should have been done. Oops.
- do you know why the word "paid" is included in the description of on tv in the blurb? it doesn't seem to be used in the article, so i am not sure if it is necessary. it is also admittedly confusing me because i am familiar with pay phones and prepaid phones, while "paid phone" suggests to me that a phone is free because someone else paid for it.
- STV confuses people, I've found. Badly. The technology is unfamiliar to people I talk to when I explain the stuff I've written. I've left "pay" in.
- according to the article on on tv, the service had more than 700,000 subscribers in 1982. would it be better to add some detail to the blurb to make it more clear that the number 120,000 only takes into account the subscribers in the chicago market? perhaps adding "in Chicagoland" after "subscribers" would work, like in the article body. also, the term "Chicagoland" could be linked to the "Chicago metropolitan area" article, if you think doing so is appropriate.
- Added "local" here instead.
- i tried to confirm that wsns was chicago's "first full-time Spanish-language television station", but was unable to find anything in the cited chicago tribune source supporting this statement. did i somehow miss it? i did notice that the source stated that there were three spanish-language television stations in chicago (excluding cable network galavisión), and that the other two weren't full-time stations, but i can only conclude from this that wsns was the only spanish-language television station in chicago at the time that had a full-time schedule; i can't tell if it was the first one. to be clear, i think the statement is likely true, but i was unable to confirm that it is, solely from reviewing the cited source.i am also unsure if it only broadcast spanish-language programming at the time: the article states that wsns "has just added SIN to its full-time schedule", which suggests to me that there were other programs on its schedule which may not have been in spanish. that being said, i can see "full-time Spanish-language television station" meaning "spanish-language television station with a full-time schedule" rather than "television station with a full-time spanish-language schedule", so perhaps the statement can be true even if wsns did not have a full-time spanish-language schedule.
- 44 was full-time Spanish. It also had lost ALL of its prior programming. This was a total flip. (and yes, 26 and 60 were part-time Spanish, the latter even being a part-time license) Also adding another reference that calls WSNS "daylong Hispanic".
- the blurb states that telemundo purchased wsns in 1995, but the article lead states that the purchase happened in 1996. is this a discrepancy that should be resolved? from what i can tell, an agreement was made in late 1995, so i am guessing that the purchase actually occurred in 1996, though i haven't found a reliable source confirming this. in addition, it looks like nbc agreed to purchase telemundo in 2001, while the purchase actually happened in 2002, which is the year the blurb mentions, so for consistency, it seems better to use the year 1996 in the first case, if that was indeed the year the purchase occurred.
- Changed as FCC approval was indeed granted in February 1996.
apologies for all the questions! i hope they're not too much trouble to address. dying (talk) 08:49, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Dying: Responded to everything with tweaks including to the blurb and the article. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- thanks for addressing all these issues! i admittedly hadn't considered the fact that main page readers may be more familiar with the term "broadcasting" than the term "outlet". thanks for pointing this out. also, using "pay" sounds like a good alternative. by the way, i noticed that you changed in the article body the assertion that the station was chicago's first full-time spanish language television station, but left it unchanged in the blurb and article lead. was this an oversight? dying (talk) 23:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Frankly, it pretty obviously was, and I don't want to overthink things here. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- thanks for addressing all these issues! i admittedly hadn't considered the fact that main page readers may be more familiar with the term "broadcasting" than the term "outlet". thanks for pointing this out. also, using "pay" sounds like a good alternative. by the way, i noticed that you changed in the article body the assertion that the station was chicago's first full-time spanish language television station, but left it unchanged in the blurb and article lead. was this an oversight? dying (talk) 23:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 | |
| my story today |
|---|
Thank you today for the article, introduced "When a new Chicago television station backed by local movie house operator Essaness Theatres hit the air in 1970 with little more than a rotating series of news headlines, this probably wasn't the history anyone expected. From being a third-string independent station that aired sports programming, the station became the key of one of the largest subscription TV systems in the United States in 1980. However, the station so totally devoted itself to subscription programming that it left itself very vulnerable to an FCC license challenge that bounced around for a decade and put the station on the brink of being handed to another company. After subscription TV withered away nationally, WSNS became the first full-time Spanish-language TV station in Chicago, first with the Spanish International Network/Univision and later with Telemundo, which acquired it in 1995." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Some more pics, and today's story is on a birthday, and the real DYK was already on that birthday --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:35, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Today, it's a place that inspired me, musings if you have time. My corner for memory and music has today a juxtaposition of what our local church choirs offer. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
The article WLIW (TV) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:WLIW (TV) for comments about the article, and Talk:WLIW (TV)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 16:40, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KTRV-TV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 19:20, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Love your pretty stripe Sammi! Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Pennsylvania call swap, with some extra complexity
In connection with recent format changes, the call signs of two commonly-owned AM radio stations in New Castle, Pennsylvania, WKST (AM) and WUZZ (AM), were swapped on October 18. WKST is now on the 1280 AM facility, and WUZZ is on 1200. That's complex enough for our purposes — but this one has the extra quirk that the articles, as presently written, largely follow the "intellectual units" rather than the licenses — which is of relevance here, because this is not the first time the 1200 and 1280 stations have swapped call signs, and WKST was also the pre-1999 call sign for 1280, going all the way back to 1938. This might necessitate a bit more fixing than would normally be done following a call swap… and it does not help that the infobox for the present WUZZ (AM) article makes it seem like there was somehow a 2004 call change from WKST to WJST on 1280 AM (WJST actually replaced WBZY). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK for WDIG (AM)
On 25 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article WDIG (AM), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an Alabama radio station was described by its program director as a "no-format mess"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WDIG (AM). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, WDIG (AM)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
The article KTRV-TV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KTRV-TV for comments about the article, and Talk:KTRV-TV/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 06:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KGWC-TV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KIKU you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 18:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KVIE you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 18:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The article KGWC-TV you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:KGWC-TV and Talk:KGWC-TV/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
The article KGWC-TV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KGWC-TV for comments about the article, and Talk:KGWC-TV/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 03:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
November Articles for creation backlog drive
Hello Sammi Brie:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
DYK for KTNL-TV
On 2 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KTNL-TV, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that until 1985, CBS programs on a TV station in Sitka, Alaska, were videotaped in Seattle and aired on a two-week delay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KTNL-TV. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, KTNL-TV), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Re: KTNL-TV
Sammi, you might want to look at KTNL-TV. It's being edited by someone with a conflict of interest. And with not many sources available, it's hard to prove notability. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Quick search of MeTV's website doesn't show KTNL as an affiliate. No press release or anything in regarding this has been released (which it normally is to a few sources), nothing in the local Sitka Sentinel newspaper or through KIFW radio (which are the two major news sources in Sitka. A WhoIs search for ktnl.tv came up with a Domains By Proxy listing, so there is no way of seeing who actually owns that site. While it seems like a long way to go for a fake, I've seen worse. While the address on their website does match the studios of KDMD (also owned by Ketchikan TV, LLC), this is far from confirming. The rest of the site does not work. Personally, I would revert in full until finding confirming sources, but that's just me. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:56, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Neutralhomer and @Mvcg66b3r A key piece here is that KTNL, like KTVA, was stripped for affiliation parts when GCI exited television. TVNewsCheck says KTNL was dark when Ketchikan TV bought it. Given the remoteness of this station, information on current operations is going to be utterly tough to get. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Sammi: I fully agree. I've been to Sitka, it's a beautiful area, but it's small and it. is. up there. For there to be a full-power TV station in a town of just 8,400 is next level. It's just that normally when MeTV/Weigel affiliates with a station, they release a press release via PR Newswire (or something similar) and it's mentioned in Broadcasting & Cable (or a similar publication). I'm not saying it's completely false, I just can't find anything to back the change up. I do, however, show the station is licensed and should be on the air, but that's not really enough to definitively confirm. I leave it up in your and Mvcg66b3r skilled hands, just my contribution. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 14:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- There's also a website; an issues and programs list set, which shows some local Sitka programming (and MeTV programs like Leave it to Beaver when they returned to the air in 2021); and so on. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- I'm just going on the information I have available, I'll leave you to it. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:39, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- There's also a website; an issues and programs list set, which shows some local Sitka programming (and MeTV programs like Leave it to Beaver when they returned to the air in 2021); and so on. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Sammi: I fully agree. I've been to Sitka, it's a beautiful area, but it's small and it. is. up there. For there to be a full-power TV station in a town of just 8,400 is next level. It's just that normally when MeTV/Weigel affiliates with a station, they release a press release via PR Newswire (or something similar) and it's mentioned in Broadcasting & Cable (or a similar publication). I'm not saying it's completely false, I just can't find anything to back the change up. I do, however, show the station is licensed and should be on the air, but that's not really enough to definitively confirm. I leave it up in your and Mvcg66b3r skilled hands, just my contribution. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 14:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Neutralhomer and @Mvcg66b3r A key piece here is that KTNL, like KTVA, was stripped for affiliation parts when GCI exited television. TVNewsCheck says KTNL was dark when Ketchikan TV bought it. Given the remoteness of this station, information on current operations is going to be utterly tough to get. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey Sammi, I noticed that the KTNL website has gone down. It's currently just GoDaddy boilerplate. I did some digging and it appears KTNL's information is being absorbed into the website of sister-station KACN/Anchorage. You can see the "Over Air 7.1 Sitka" listed in the "Where to find Me-TV in Alaska?" box. That might also mean a change in logo, but I'll leave that part up to you. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:46, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- What a time for it to go down. Extremely frustrating. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:12, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- I know, but there all is not lost. There is the alternate website and the YouTube video below for sourcing, so it'll work out. :) I can make the changes, if you'd like (since I'm not very schooled on new WP:TVS rules). - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
I also found this video announcing MeTV in Sitka, as well. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:50, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- KTNL's website is back up. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 13:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on KXTX-TV
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page KXTX-TV, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on KXTX-TV
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page KXTX-TV, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 November newsletter
The WikiCup is a marathon rather than a sprint and all those reaching the final round have been involved in the competition for the last ten months, improving Wikipedia vastly during the process. After all this hard work, 
BeanieFan11 has emerged as the 2023 winner and the WikiCup Champion. The finalists this year were:-
BeanieFan11 with 2582 points- Thebiguglyalien with 1615 points
- Epicgenius with 1518 points
MyCatIsAChonk with 1012 points
BennyOnTheLoose with 974 points
AirshipJungleman29 with 673 points- Sammi Brie with 520 points
Unlimitedlead with 5 points
Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the competition, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.
- Unlimitedlead wins the featured article prize, for 7 FAs in total including 3 in round 2.
- MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in total.
Lee Vilenski wins the featured topic prize, for a 6-article featured topic in round 4.- MyCatIsAChonk wins the featured picture prize, for 6 FPs in total.
- BeanieFan11 wins the good article prize, for 75 GAs in total, including 61 in the final round.
- Epicgenius wins the good topic prize, for a 41-article good topic in the final round.
LunaEatsTuna wins the GA reviewer prize, for 70 GA reviews in round 1.- MyCatIsAChonk wins the FA reviewer prize, for 66 FA reviews in the final round.
- Epicgenius wins the DYK prize, for 49 did you know articles in total.
Muboshgu wins the ITN prize, for 46 in the news articles in total.
The WikiCup has run every year since 2007. With the 2023 contest now concluded, I will be standing down as a judge due to real life commitments, so I hope that another editor will take over running the competition. Please get in touch if you are interested. Next year's competition will hopefully begin on 1 January 2024. You are invited to sign up to participate in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors. It only remains to congratulate our worthy winners once again and thank all participants for their involvement! (If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.) Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 | |
| my story today |
|---|
- Congratulations! - Perfect timing - I just wanted to bring November thanks anyway, having updated pics to 24 Oct. I proudly remember having sung in an oratorio premiere seven years ago OTD. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt This wasn't my best round at Cup... Still have an FAC under review and didn't get all that many nibbles at my GA nominees. But I'm really proud of how I've improved as an editor in four years doing it. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WNPT you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 04:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The article KVIE you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KVIE for comments about the article, and Talk:KVIE/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 04:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WPBF you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 04:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The article WPBF you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WPBF for comments about the article, and Talk:WPBF/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KVOA you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
DYK for KGWC-TV
On 10 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KGWC-TV, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a retired man with no previous broadcasting experience was offered a job by a Wyoming TV station after winning an "Anchorman for a Day" contest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KGWC-TV. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, KGWC-TV), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The article KVOA you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:KVOA and Talk:KVOA/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The article KVOA you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KVOA for comments about the article, and Talk:KVOA/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
The article KIKU you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:KIKU and Talk:KIKU/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 20:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wanted to add something to this: In the "Sale to WRNN" section, there is a sentence that reads "The change led to considerable outcry. Kihara told Pacific Business News, "We've been getting calls and emails and texts all day." Who "Kihara" is is never said (ie: first name, position at the station). - Neutralhomer • Talk • 20:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Neutralhomer Fixed this while I was at it. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Awesome, I'd say it's ready for GA. Well sources, not issues that I can see. Well done! - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Neutralhomer Fixed this while I was at it. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup awards
- Thank you @Cwmhiraeth for running the Cup all these years. Doing it from 2020 to 2023 has definitely improved the depth and breadth of my contributions to the project, and I'm really grateful. I don't think I take any articles to FA without the encouragement of the Cup. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I think the WikiCup stimulates many editors into greater efforts and working on improving the quality of their articles. Coverage of US TV and radio stations has come on in leaps and bounds as a result of your efforts. Thanks, and long may the cup continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Such astounding work, especially with difficult articles like Milton Grant! Even if the GT doesn't pan out, you still got all the articles within to GA, which is a feat in of itself. Congrats! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I think the WikiCup stimulates many editors into greater efforts and working on improving the quality of their articles. Coverage of US TV and radio stations has come on in leaps and bounds as a result of your efforts. Thanks, and long may the cup continue. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:17, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The article KIKU you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KIKU for comments about the article, and Talk:KIKU/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 20:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
WLMT
Hey Sammi, I noticed that the WLMT article has a WPRS banner on it's talkpage. I took a quick look and don't immediately see a radio connection. Should that be removed? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:51, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Neutralhomer Yeah, I'm going to junk it. It was added in 2007 by User:MadeYourReadThis, who created many a radio stub. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Okie Dokie. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
The article WNPT you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WNPT for comments about the article, and Talk:WNPT/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 07:03, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WXLV-TV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 15:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
DYK for KTRV-TV
On 17 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article KTRV-TV, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in its first full month on the air, an Idaho TV station had the highest prime-time viewing share of any independent station in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/KTRV-TV. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, KTRV-TV), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on KTSF
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page KTSF, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:04, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
The article WXLV-TV you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:WXLV-TV and Talk:WXLV-TV/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 21:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
The article WXLV-TV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WXLV-TV for comments about the article, and Talk:WXLV-TV/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 04:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of TVX Broadcast Group
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article TVX Broadcast Group you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 04:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Promotion of WWJ-TV
Your GA nomination of TVX Broadcast Group
The article TVX Broadcast Group you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:TVX Broadcast Group and Talk:TVX Broadcast Group/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 02:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Radio-Locator
DYK for WLIW (TV)
On 21 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article WLIW (TV), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Long Island's PBS station specialized in making shows for other stations to air during their pledge drives? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WLIW (TV). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, WLIW (TV)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on WKBD-TV
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page WKBD-TV, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:32, 21 November 2023 (UTC)