User talk:SONSAVASCI~enwiki

Fenerbahçe

I've responded to your message about the article at Talk:Fenerbahçe_S.K.#propaganda_and_disinformation, I'd like to hear a reply. CAN 22:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

request

arkadaşlar merhaba, şu sıralar wikideki ermeniler iyice azıtmış durumda, türkiye ve türkler hakkındaki tüm kaynakları referanslarıyla birlikte imha çabası içerisindeler. özellikle "Turkey", "Turkish People" ve "Turkic peoples " sayfaları ve bunlar ile bağlantılı sayfalar hiç olmadığı kadar tehdit altında, türkiyenin neredeyse tüm şehirlerinin sayfalarına kendi ulusal reklamlarını eklemek üzereler. bununlada yetineyip kendileriyle hiçbir alakası olmayan "tarihteki türk uygarlıkları" ile ilgili makalelere saldırma çirkinliğinide atlamıyorlar. lütfen aşşağıdaki bu ve bunun gibi wiki bağlantılarını kullanarak bu tehdite karşı koyalım. sayıları bizden çok daha az yeterki organize olalım. saygılar

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism

--hakozen 01:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Your removal of sourced information from Wikipedia can be considered as vandalism. And your actions will be reported to the Administrators notice board. Please discuss your proposed changes before deleting anymore information. --VartanM 02:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Bro, I see you've already received some contact about your recent flourish of activity. I'm not going to worry about any residual messes you've created, I just dropped in to ask you why you reverted one of my recent contributions without noting why. Did you want to contest something in the text? The picture you removed from the entry, it's truly a moving sight, is it not?

It looks a little bit like you're trying to conceal from people that there are forces in modern Turkey that embraced the murder as patriotic. By including the picture, I thought I'd done justice to the spectrum of political opinion in Turkey: a few isolated individuals, and a magnificent onslaught of decency through the streets. Do you feel otherwise? Aren't those trophy photos of government officials with the killer utterly central to the story? Cheers! DBaba 03:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you have me confused with someone else, about trying to be "funny". I was just trying to talk to you about the edits you made; to me, they appear to be attempting to obscure the truth... I'm sorry if you feel antagonized or insulted, I'm only trying to work with you... Why have you removed all mention of the glorification of the killer by Turkish authorities? Peace, DBaba 03:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry I haven't heard back from you. I just want you to know, I still want to work with you, particularly on the Armenian-Turkish Relations entry. I noticed you created a page entitled "Sneaky vandalism", and I can't help but wonder if you're accusing me of being sneaky or a vandal, somehow?

I'm telling you right now, if you see a problem in the Armenian-Turkish Relations page, I value your perspective, and I'd like to know what you object to. But unfortunately I see you removing cited information, apparently to conceal the truth rather than reveal it; if I'm wrong, please just let me know. I've certainly been wrong before! If you see a problem in the text, please just make a change, cite the corrective text, and describe your change in the edit summary.

If I can help you, in any way, I'd still like to. I really think some of your changes (outside the A-T relations changes you made, which I can't imagine a justification for) could really be contributory, and it would be a shame for Wikipedia not to be enriched by your presence... Particularly if you came to spend your time here engaging in petty vendettas, or enforcing censorship. Your friend, DBaba 14:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive Reverts

Please refrain from the unconstructive reverts. The issue was raised at this ANI post. Please feel free to explain your position for the reverts before continuing to do more.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 03:45, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called SONSAVASCI. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name SONSAVASCI~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

18:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey)

Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in setting up Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Turkey), based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). Now it's not a contest in itself, it's designed to motivate people to inspire others to improve content and build something which demonstrates the hard work going into the country which is visible. The focus is more on quality improvements but new articles are welcome too. Eventually a Turkish National Contest could be created to fuel it, like Wikipedia:Awaken the Dragon, in which contestants can choose to keep the Amazon vouchers themselves to buy their own books for more articles or put them into book fund to help editors further improve Turkish-related topics by giving them the books they want. It will begin though as purely an improvement drive. If interested, or you think anybody else might be interested, alert them and sign up on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey talk page at the bottom. Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:29, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]