User talk:RouteLeader

Welcome!

Hello, RouteLeader, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adult Diapers in France

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adult Diapers in France, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. The best way to improve the article is to demonstrate that there is a subject there to be discussed and providing sources. What you need is to show secondary sources discussing the subject. Presently it starts with a couple of vague claims about nothing really, then goes straight into what looks like a plug for one manufacturer and the quality of their products, with a link to their website. It may not have been your intention, but it reads like an advert. Also, are you sure you have enough suitable content to devote an entire article to such a narrow topic? Would an article based on the European, or even the global, market not be more achievable? You can give countries separate sections if need be. And if they prove to be length, then you can create separate articles. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:21, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

I've left a message at the section you created on Talk:Adult Diapers in France. - Purplewowies (talk) 23:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your message on my talk page, I know. I was just suggesting you should do that, since you asked for advice on what to do.

- Purplewowies (talk) 23:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TB

Hello, RouteLeader. You have new messages at WP:AN.
Message added 23:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Calm As Midnight 23:59, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Fuming

I have seen your posts concerning your experience in creating a new article. I see you have gotten advice on how to proceed with you article. My concern is the statement you have made about admins pouncing on editors because they are new. Do you have any examples where admins pounced on editors because they were new? GB fan 00:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks can easily be misinterpreted. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. - Purplewowies (talk) 00:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Purplewowies (talk) 00:41, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Personal attacks on other editors are not welcome at Wikipedia and will always result in a block such as this. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 00:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RouteLeader (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:Singularity42 hacked my account and started posting rude comments about other Wikipedians. You need to block him not me. RouteLeader (talk) 00:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nonsense. I think we're done here. Kuru (talk) 00:57, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.