User talk:RoquePedro

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RoquePedro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yes this is me Roqui15. Like I said this account was my old account that I never used at the same time with Roqui15. As you can see this account is more than 2 years old and I stopped edit soon after. I decided to return to this account for the purpose of editing again, but I never went to the list of largest empires. As I was unjustly blocked, I returned to this account. As it says "Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not", obviously I am not using this account for illegitimate reasons, I was using it because I was blocked unfairly. Stop it, enough of this madness, just unblock me, I remain blocked for unreal reasons. No one deserves to be blocked for something they didn't do.RoquePedro (talk) 12:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have confirmed you have used this account to evade your block on Roqui15, in violation of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. The block is legitimate, you were using this account for illegitimate reasons. You are free to contest the block on your original account but note, this block evasion will count significantly against you. Yamla (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wait a second Yamla (talk). Be pratical here, think a little a bit. My reasons are obvious.

1- I was blocked unfairly and obviously as much as I don't like what wikipedia users are doing to me, I still enjoy editing wikipedia and help in the general knowledge and I came back to this old account (which I used before Roqui15).

2- I was being completly ignored in my unblock request, that's why I came back to this account. I didn't try to "evade", I was here just to edit completly different pages. Which it seems you reverted by no reason at all.

RoquePedro (talk) 13:17, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Also I notice something strange here. The user who blocked me deleted all the edits I did last week and 2 years ago. Strange, very strange. Why would he do that? I think I know why... RoquePedro (talk) 13:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

You are blocked. You. You the person. You are not permitted to sign in with this account or any other, and continue editing. This is a direct violation of WP:EVADE. It doesn't matter if you think the block on your original account was unfair, that doesn't permit you to evade your block. Please listen to what you are being told. You are free to contest the block on your original account, but as I have already noted, the fact that you have evaded your block will significantly count against you. --Yamla (talk) 14:28, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Imagine yourself in this place. Would you like to be blocked for something you didn't do? What would you do if you had an old account? Yes you would go back to your old account in order to keep editing wikipedia. And yes it does matter if I was blocked fairly or not, because no one can do this, block me because I had multiple accounts? That's a lie! I had only one Roqui15. This cannot be like this, it simply cannot.

This is what yall wanted. You must be so happy. After a exausthed search finnaly you guys found out my 2 year old account! It's incredible what hate can do. RoquePedro (talk) 16:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

August 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 13:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)