User talk:Romartus Imperator

May 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Uncyclopedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not remove other people's comments, especially within RfCs. Do not manipulate RfCs in your favor. KevTYD (wake up) 22:26, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the rules set out on the RfC before warning people for breaking the rules when you are doing it yourself. Romartus Imperator (talk) 22:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your comment on my edit before simply removing it. (User: JvDuijn) —Preceding undated comment added 19:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

This kitten for you. I'm happy to see you fighting vandalism on Wikipedia. You are making a difference. Best -

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 21:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Watson is a popular YouTuber and he should be on Matt Watson Wikipedia

He should be on Wikipedia Supermega fan (talk) 22:52, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:N. Romartus Imperator (talk) 23:11, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:UAA

Hey there, just as a heads up regarding Vrikshit, a lot of Indian names actually have the string "shit" in them (Dikshit is a rather infamous example that hits UAA from time to time). If the user appears to be from an Indian background you might want to give them the benefit of the doubt. bibliomaniac 1 5 00:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're caution alert you sent me was unnecessary

The caution alert you sent me was unnecessary due to the fact that it was indeed constructive. It was informative about the you are already dead meme on the internet incase an individual did not know. I am going to fix the edit I had already made. Please refrain from sending unnecessary alerts/cautions in the future. JV Vibes (talk) 11:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:66.130.253.101 has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Preceding undated comment added 19:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of small shopping centres in Montreal. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.130.253.101 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by genre

Hello, I am new to Wikipedia. I was just trying to remove irrelevant information in the Mata Sheetla Devi Temple page and I was trying to change the spelling so that it matched that of the Shitala Devi page on Wikipedia. You reverted my change and said that I am changing genres. What do you mean by that? Thanks. Minal75 (talk) 19:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Romartus Imperator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand why I have been blocked as a sockpuppet of a user, who I was previously checked against and this came back negative. I only operate this account. I have not abused multiple accounts. I am being targeted by a WP:MEAT/WP:COI campaign by members of Uncyclopedia.co and I feel that the administrator who blocked me has given into this campaign without looking at the evidence that previously proved that I am NOT a sockpuppet. I urge you to please reconsider this block as it is false and quite insulting. I have made nothing but positive contributions to Wikipedia and I intend to continue along this path.

Decline reason:

Pro-tip: using a VPN does not prevent CheckUsers from seeing that you've engaged in trolling while logged out. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.